Cognitive dynamics and indexicals

Mind and Language

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 369-391

  Prosser, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944578286     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00292.x     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Borg, E. 2000: Complex demonstratives. Philosophical Studies, 97, 229-49.
2. Braun, D. 1994: Structured characters and complex demonstratives. Philosophical Studies, 74, 193-219.
3. Campbell, J. 1987: Is sense transparent? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 88, 273-292.
4. Campbell, J. 1993: The role of physical objects in spatial thinking. In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy and B. Brewer (eds), Spatial Representation. Oxford: Blackwell, 65-95.
5. Campbell, J. 1994: Past, Space and Self. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press/A Bradford Book.
6. Campbell, J. 1998: Joint attention and the first person. In A. O'Hear (ed.), Current Issues in Philosophy of Mind; Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123-136.
7. Chalmers, D.J. 2002: On sense and intension. In J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 16: Language and Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 135-82.
8. Corazza, E. 2002: 'She' and 'He': Politically correct pronouns. Philosophical Studies, 111, 173-196.
9. Corlett, J. 1992: The role of vision in the planning and guidance of locomotion through the environment. In L. Proteau and D. Elliott (eds), Vision and Motor Control. Elsevier Science, 375-397.
10. Davies, M. 1982: Individuation and the semantics of demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11, 287-310.
11. Dever, J. 2001: Complex demonstratives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 271-330.
12. Elliott, D. 1987: The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 476-485.
13. Evans, G. 1982: The Varieties of Reference. Edited by J. McDowell. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14. Evans, G. 1985: Understanding demonstratives. In G. Evans, Collected Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. Originally in H. Parret and J. Bouveresse (eds) 1981: Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 280-303.
16. Fodor, J.A. 1998: Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Frege, G. 1956: The thought: A logical inquiry. Translated by A.M. and M. Quinton. Mind, 65, 289-311.
18. Hoerl, C. 1997: Cognitive dynamics: An attempt at changing your mind. In J. Dokic (ed.), European Review of Philosophy, vol. 2: Cognitive Dynamics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 141-158.
19. Kaplan, D. 1978: Dthat. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press.
20. Kaplan, D. 1989: Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Kaplan, D. 1989a: Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Kaplan, D. 1990: Words. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 64, 93-119.
23. King, J.C. 2001: Complex Demonstratives: A Quantificational Account. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press/A Bradford Book.
24. Le Poidevin, R (ed.), 1998: Questions of Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25. Lepore, E. and Ludwig, K. 2000: The semantics and pragmatics of complex demonstratives. Mind, 109, 199-240.
26. Lewis, D. 1979: Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review, 88, 513-543.
27. Loomis, J.M., Da Silva, J.A., Fujita, N., and Fukusima, S.S. 1992: Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 906-921.
28. Luntley, M. 1997: Dynamic thoughts and empty minds. In J. Dokic (ed.), European Review of Philosophy, vol. 2: Cognitive Dynamics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 77-103.
29. Luntley, M. 1998: The 'practical turn' and the convergence of traditions. Philosophical Explorations, 1, 10-27.
30. Luntley, M. 1999: Contemporary Philosophy of Thought: Truth, World, Content. Oxford: Blackwell.
31. McDowell, J. 1984: De re senses. The Philosophical Quarterly, 34, 283-294.
32. McGinn, C. 1981: The mechanism of reference. Synthese, 49, 157-86.
33. Mellor, D.H. 1998: Real Time II. London/New York: Routledge.
34. Oaklander, L.Nathan and Quentin Smith (eds) 1994: The New Theory of Time. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
35. Peacocke, C. 1981: Demonstrative thought and psychological explanation. Synthese, 49, 187-217.
36. Peacocke, C. 1992: A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/A Bradford Book.
37. Perry, J. 1977: Frege on demonstratives. The Philosophical Review, 86, 474-497.
38. Reprinted in J. Perry 1993: The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Also expanded edition 2000: Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
39. Perry, J 1979: The problem of the essential indexical. Nôus, 13, 3-21.
40. Reprinted in J. Perry 1993: The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Also expanded edition 2000: Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
41. Perry, J 1986: Thought without representation. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 60, 137-52.
42. Reprinted in J. Perry 1993: The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Also expanded edition 2000: Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
43. Perry, J. 1997: Rip van Winkle and other characters. In J. Dokic (ed.), European Review of Philosophy, vol. 2: Cognitive Dynamics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 13-39.
44. Perry, J. 1997a: Indexicals and demonstratives. In B. Hale and C. Wright (eds), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 586-612.
45. Perry, J. 2001: Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
46. Philbeck, J.W. and Loomis, J.M. 1997: Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 72-85.
47. Prosser, S. 2000: A new problem for the A-theory of time. The Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 494-98.
48. Recanati, F. 1993: Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Richard, M. 1993: Articulated terms. In J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 7, Language and Logic. Atascadero: Ridgeview, 207-30.
50. Rieser, J.J., Ashmead, D.H., Talor, C.R. and Youngquist, G.A. 1990: Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception, 19, 675-689.
51. Schiffer, S. 1981: Indexicals and the theory of reference. Synthese, 57, 43-100.
52. Shoemaker, S. 1994: Phenomenal character. Noûs, 28, 21-38.
53. Smith, Q. 1989: The multiple uses of indexicals. Synthese, 78, 167-191.
54. Smith, Q. 1990: Temporal indexicals. Erkenntnis, 32, 5-25.
55. Smith, Q. 1993: Language and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Stalnaker, R.C. 1999: Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Stalnaker, R.C. 2001: On considering a possible world as actual. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 75, 141-156.
58. Steenhuis, R.E. and Goodale, M.A. 1988: The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: does an accurate short-term memory for spatial location exist? Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 399-415.
59. Thomson, J.A. 1983: Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 427-443.