On sense and intension

Nous

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2002, Pages 135-182

  Chalmers, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751192042     PISSN: 00294624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.6     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Braun, D. 1996. Demonstratives and their linguistic meanings. Nous 30: 145-73.
2. Burge, T. 1979. Sinning against Frege. Philosophical Review 58: 398-432.
3. Carnap, R. 1947. Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press.
4. Chalmers, D.J. 2002a. Does conceivability entail possibility? In (T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne, eds) Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. [consc.net/papers/conceivability.html]
5. Chalmers, D.J. 2002b. The components of content. In (D. Chalmers, ed) Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press. [consc.net/papers/content.html]
6. Chalmers, D.J. forthcoming a. The foundations of two-dimensional semantics. [consc.net/papers/foundations.html]
7. Chalmers, D.J. forthcoming b. The nature of epistemic space, [consc.net/papers/espace.html]
8. Chalmers, D.J. forthcoming c. The tyranny of the subjunctive. [consc.net/papers/tryanny.html]
9. Donnellan, K. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75: 281-304.
10. Dummett, M. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. Duckworth.
11. Evans, G. 1973. The causal theory of names. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume) 47: 187-208.
12. Frege, G. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Translated in (P. Geach & M. Black, eds.) Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 1952.
13. Fumerton, R. 1989. Russelling causal theories of reference. In (C. Savage and C. Anderson, eds.) Rereading Russell. University of Minnesota Press.
14. Jackson, F. 1998. Reference and description revisited. Philosophical Perspectives 12: 201-18.
15. Kaplan, D. 1989. Demonstratives. In (J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Kripke, S.A. 1977. Speaker's reference and semantic reference. In (P. French, ed.) Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. University of Minnesota Press.
17. Kripke, S.A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Lewis, D. 1979. Attitudes de dicto and de se. Philosophical Review 88: 513-43.
19. Lewis, D. 1986. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221-36.
20. Mill, J.S. 1843. A System of Logic. London: Longmans.
21. Perry, J. 1977. Frege on demonstratives. Philosophical Review 86: 476-97.
22. Perry, J. 1979. The problem of the essential indexical. Nous 13: 3-21.
23. Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of 'meaning'. In (K. Gunderson, ed.) Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24. Recanati, F. 1993. Direct Reference. Blackwell.
25. Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
26. Soames, S. 1998. The modal argument: Wide scope and rigidified descriptions. Nous 32: 1-22.
27. Sosa, D. 2001. Rigidity in the scope of Russell's theory. Nous 35: 1-38.
28. Stalnaker, R. 1978. Assertion. In (P. Cole, ed.) Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics, Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press
29. Stanley, J. 1997. Names and rigid designation. In (C. Wright and R. Hale, eds) Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell.