The Notch targets Esr1 and Esr10 are differentially regulated in Xenopus neural precursors

Development

Volumn 132, Issue 16, 2005, Pages 3619-3630

  Lamar, Elise ^a   Kintner, Chris ^a  

^a SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

bHLH; E(spl) hairy; Esr; HES; Neurogenesis; Notch; Xenopus

Indexed keywords

HELIX LOOP HELIX PROTEIN; NOTCH RECEPTOR; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR ESR1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR ESR10; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; E BOX ELEMENT; EMBRYO; ENHANCER REGION; GEL MOBILITY SHIFT ASSAY; GENE DELETION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; HETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; TRANSGENICS; XENOPUS;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; ENHANCER ELEMENTS (GENETICS); GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENES, REPORTER; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; NEURONS; PHYLOGENY; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); RECEPTORS, NOTCH; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

ANURA; VERTEBRATA; XENOPUS (GENUS);

EID: 24944558054     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.01937     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Amaya, E. and Kroll, K. L. (1999). A method for generating transgenic frog embryos. Methods Mol. Biol. 97, 393-414.
2. Bailey, A. and Posakony, J. W. (1995). Suppressor of Hairless directly activates transcription of Enhancer of split Complex genes in response to Notch receptor activity. Genes Dev. 9, 2609-2622.
3. Barolo, S. and Posakony, J. W. (2002). Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes Dev. 16, 1167-1181.
4. Cau, E., Casarosa, S. and Guillemot, F. (2002). Mash1 and Ngn1 control distinct steps of determination and differentiation in the olfactory sensory neuron lineage. Development 129, 1871-1880.
5. Cave, J. W., Loh, F., Surpris, J. W., Xia, L. and Candy, M. A. (2005). A DNA transcription code for cell-specific gene activation by notch signaling. Curr. Biol. 15, 94-104.
6. Chitnis, A., Henrique, D., Lewis, J., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Kintner, C. (1995). Primary neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos regulated by a homologue of the Drosophila neurogenic gene Delta. Nature 375, 761-766.
7. Cooper, M. T. D., Tyler, D. M., Furriols, M., Chaldiadaki, A., Delidakis, C. and Bray, S. (2000). Spatially restricted factors cooperate with Notch in the regulation of Enhancer of split genes. Dev. Biol. 221, 390-403.
8. Davis, R. L. and Turner, D. L. (2001). Vertebrate hairy and Enhancer of split related proteins: transcriptional repressors regulating cellular differentiation and embryonic patterning. Oncogene 20, 8342-8357.
9. Davis, R., Turner, D., Evans, L. and Kirschner, M. (2001). Molecular targets of vertebrate segmentation: two mechanisms control segmental expression of Xenopus hairy2 during somite formation. Dev. Cell 1, 553-565.
10. Deblandre, G. A., Wettstein, D. A., Koyano-Nakagawa, N. and Kintner, C. (1999). A two-step mechanism generates the spacing pattern of the ciliated cells in the skin of Xenopus embryos. Development 126, 4715-4728.
11. Fior, R. and Henrique, D. (2005). A novel hes5/hes6 circuitry of negative regulation controls Notch activity during neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 281, 318-333.
12. Fisher, A. and Caudy, M. (1998). The function of hairy-related bHLH proteins in cell fate decisions. BioEssays 20, 298-306.
13. Fryer, C. J., Lamar, E., Turbachova, I., Kintner, C. and Jones, K. A. (2002). Mastermind mediates chromatin-specific transcription and turnover of the Notch Enhancer complex. Genes Dev. 16, 1397-1411.
14. Furriols, M. and Bray, S. (2001). A model Notch response element detects Suppressor of Hairless-dependent molecular switch. Curr. Biol. 11, 60-64.
15. Gajewski, M. and Voolstra, C. (2002). Comparative analysis of somitogenesis related genes of the hairy/Enhancer of split class in Fugu and zebrafish. BMC Genomics 3, 21.
16. Gawantka, V., Pollet, N., Delius, H., Vingron, M., Pfister, R., Nitsch, R., Blumenstock, C. and Niehrs, C. (1998). Gene expression screening in Xenopus identifies molecular pathways, predicts gene function and provides a global view of embryonic patterning. Mech. Dev. 77, 95-141.
17. Glavic, A., Silva, F., Aybar, M. J., Bastidas, F. and Mayor, R. (2003). Interplay between Notch signaling and the homeoprotein Xiro1 is required for neural crest induction in Xenopus embryos. Development 131, 347-359.
18. Harland, R. (1991). In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. In Methods in Cell Biology, Vol. 36 (ed. B. K. Kay and H. B. Peng), pp. 685-695. San Diego. CA: Academic Press.
19. Hatakeyama, J., Bessho, Y., Katoh, K., Ookawara, S., Fujioka, M., Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (2004). Hes genes regulate size, shape and histogenesis of the nervous system by control of the timing of neural stem cell differentiation. Development 131, 5539-5550.
20. Heitzler, P. and Simpson, P. (1991). The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell 64, 1083-1092.
21. Heitzler, P., Bourouis, M., Ruel, C., Carteret, C. and Simpson, P. (1996). Genes of the Enhancer of split and achaete-scute complexes are required for a regulatory loop between Notch and Delta during lateral signalling in Drosophila. Development 122, 161-171.
22. Hutcheson, D. A., Hanson, M., Moore, K. B., Le, T., Brown, N. and Vetter, M. L. (2005). bHLH-dependent and -independent modes of Ath5 gene regulation during retinal development. Development 132, 829-839.
23. Ishibashi, M., Ang, S.-L., Shiota, K., Nakanishi, S., Kageyama, R. and Guillemot, F. (1995). Targeted disruption of mammalian hairy and Enhancer of split homolog-1 (HES-1) leads to up-regulation of neural helix-loop-helix factors, premature neurogenesis, and severe neural tube defects. Genes Dev. 9, 3136-3148.
24. Jarriault, S., Brou, C., Logeat, F., Schroeter, E. H., Kopan, R. and Israel, A. (1995). Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature 377, 355-358.
25. Jen, W. C., Wettstein, D., Turner, D., Chitnis, A. and Kintner, C. (1997). The Notch ligand, X-Delta-2, mediates segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Development 124, 1169-1178.
26. Jouve, C., Palmeirim, I., Henrique, D., Beckers, J., Gossler, A., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Pourquie, O. (2000). Notch signalling is required for cyclic expression of the hairy-like gene HES1 in the presomitic mesoderm. Development 127, 1421-1429.
27. Kan, L., Israsena, N., Zhang, Z., Hu, M., Zhao, L. R., Jalali, A., Sahni, V. and Kessler, J. A. (2004). Sox1 acts through multiple independent pathways to promote neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 269, 580-594.
28. Karp, X. and Greenwald, I. (2003). Post transcriptional regulation of the E/Daughterless ortholog HLH-2, negative feedback, and birth order bias during AC/VU decision in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 17, 3100-3111.
29. Kintner, C. (2003). Notch signaling in vertebrate development. In Handbook of Cell Signaling, pp. 813-826. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
30. Knust, E., Schrons, H., Grawe, F. and Campos-Ortega, J. A. (1992). Seven genes of the Enhancer of split complex of Drosophila melanogaster encode helix-loop-helix proteins. Genetics 132, 505-518.
31. Kooh, P., Fehon, R. G. and Muskavitch, M. (1993). Implication of dynamic patterns of Delta and Notch expression for cellular interactions during Drosophila development. Development 117, 493-507.
32. Koyano-Nakagawa, N., Wettstein, D. and Kintner, C. (1999). Activation of Xenopus genes required for lateral inhibition and neuronal differentiation during primary neurogenesis. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 14, 327-339.
33. Koyano-Nakagawa, N., Kim, J., Anderson, D. and Kintner, C. (2000). Hes6 acts in a positive feedback loop with the neurogenins to promote neuronal differentiation. Development 127, 4203-4216.
34. Kramatschek, B. and Campos-Ortega, J. A. (1994). Neuroectodermal transcription of the Drosophila neurogenic genes E(spl) and HLH-m5 is regulated by proneural genes. Development 120, 815-826.
35. Kunisch, M., Haenlin, M. and Campos-Ortega, J. A. (1994). Lateral inhibition mediated by the Drosophila neurogenic gene delta is enhanced by proneural proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10139-10143.
36. Lamar, E. and Kintner, C. (2003). Transcriptional activity of Notch and CSL proteins. In Handbook of Cell Signaling, pp. 149-159. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
37. Lamar, E., Deblandre, G., Wettstein, D., Gawantka, V., Pollet, N., Niehrs, C. and Kintner, C. (2001). Nrarp is a novel ikntracellular component of the Notch signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 15, 1885-1899.
38. Lee, S.-K. and Pfaff, S. L. (2003). Synchronization of neurogenesis and motor neuron specification by direct coupling of bHLH and homeodomain transcription factors. Neuron 38, 731-745.
39. Li, Y., Fenger, U., Niehrs, C. and Pollet, N. (2003). Cyclic expression of esr9 gene in Xenopus presomitic mesoderm. Differentiation 71, 83-89.
40. Ling, P., Hsieh, J., Ruf, D., Rawlins, D. and Hayward, S. D. (1994). EBNA-2 upregulation of Epstein-Barr virus latency promoters and the cellular CD23 promoter utilizes a common targeting intermediate, CBF1. J. Virol. 68, 5375-5383.
41. Ma, Q., Kintner, C. and Anderson, D. J. (1996). Identification of neurogenin, a vertebrate neuronal determination gene. Cell 87, 43-52.
42. Moreno, T. A. and Kintner, C. (2004). Regulation of segmental patterning by retinoic acid signaling during Xenopus somitogenesis. Dev. Cell 6, 205-218.
43. Mui, S. H., Kim, J. W., Lemke, G. and Bertuzzi, S. (2005). Vax genes ventralize the eye. Genes Dev. 19, 1249-1259.
44. Nellesen, D. T., Lai, E. C. and Posakony, J. W. (1999). Discrete Enhancer elements mediate selective responsiveness of Enhancer of split complex genes to common transcriptional activators. Dev. Biol. 213, 33-53.
45. Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber, J. (1967). Normal Table of Xenopus laevis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
46. Ohsako, S., Hyer, J., Panganiban, G., Oliver, I. and Caudy, M. (1994). Hairy function as a DNA-binding helix-loop-helix repressor of Drosophila sensory organ formation. Genes Dev. 8, 2743-2755.
47. Ohtsuka, T., Ishibashi, M., Gradwohl, G., Nakanishi, S., Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (1999). Hes1 and Hes5 as notch effectors in mammalian neuronal differentiation. EMBO J. 18, 2196-2207.
48. Papalopulu, N. and Kintner, C. (1996). A posteriorising factor, retinoic acid, reveals that anteroposterior patterning controls the timing of neuronal differentiation in Xenopus neurectoderm. Development 122, 3409-3418.
49. Petcherski, A. and Kimble, J. (2000). LAG-3 is a putative transcriptional activator in the C. elegans Notch pathway. Nature 405, 364-368.
50. Powell, L. M., Zur Lage, P. I., Prentice, D. R., Senthinathan, B. and Jarman, A. P. (2004). The proneural proteins Atonal and Scute regulate neural target genes through different E-box binding sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9517-9526.
51. Reeves, N. and Posakony, J. W. (2005). Genetic programs activated by proneural proteins in the developing Drosophila PNS. Dev. Cell 8, 413-425.
52. Sasai, Y., Kageyama, R., Tagawa, Y., Shigemoto, R. and Nakanishi, S. (1992). Two mammalian helix-loop-helix factors structurally related to Drosophila hairy and Enhancer of split. Genes Dev. 6, 2620-2634.
53. Seydoux, G. and Greenwald, I. (1989). Cell autonomy of lin-12 function in a cell fate decision in C. elegans. Cell 57, 1237-1245.
54. Sparrow, D., Latinkic, B. and Mohun, T. (2000). A simplified method of generating transgenic Xenopus. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, E12.
55. Stancheva, I., Collins, A. L., Van den Veyver, I. B., Zoghbi, H. and Meehan, R. R. (2003). A mutant form of MeCP2 protein associated with human Rett syndrome cannot be displaced from methylated DNA by notch in Xenopus embryos. Mol. Cell 12, 425-435.
56. Takebayashi, K., Sasai, Y., Sakai, Y., Watanabe, T., Nakanishi, S. and Kageyama, R. (1994). Structure, chromosomal locus, and promoter analysis of the gene encoding the mouse helix-loop-helix factor HES-1. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5150-5156.
57. Takke, C., Dornseifer, P., V Weizacker, E. and Campos-Ortega, J. A. (1999). her4, a zebrafish homologue of the Drosophila neurogenic gene E(spl), is a target of NOTCH signalling. Development 126, 1811-1821.
58. Tsuji, S., Cho, K. W. and Hashimoto, C. (2003). Expression pattern of a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Xhairy2b during Xenopus laevis development. Dev. Genes Evol. 213, 407-411.
59. Tun, T., Hamaguchi, Y., Matsunami, N., Furukawa, T., Honjo, T. and Kawaichi, M. (1994). Recognition sequence of a highly conserved DNA binding protein RBP-Jk. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 965-971.
60. Turner, D. L. and Weintraub, H. (1994). Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate. Genes Dev. 8, 1434-1447.
61. Van Doren, M., Ellis, H. M. and Posakony, J. W. (1991). The Drosophila extramacrochaetae protein antagonizes sequence-specific DNA binding by daughterless/achaete-scute protein complexes. Development 113, 245-255.
62. Van Doren, M., Powell, P., Pasternak, D., Singson, A. and Posakony, J. W. (1992). Spatial regulation of proneural gene activity: Auto- and cross-activation of achaete is antagonized by extramacrochaetae. Genes Dev. 6, 2592-2605.
63. Wettstein, D., Turner, D. and Kintner, C. (1997). The Xenopus homolog of Drosophila Suppressor of Hairless mediates Notch signaling during primary neurogenesis. Development 124, 3693-3702.
64. Yutzey, K. E. and Konieczny, S. F. (1992). Different E-box regulatory sequences are functionally distinct when placed within the context of the troponin I enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5105-5113.