Genetic relationship of ornamental peach determined using AFLP markers

HortScience

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1782-1786

  Hu, Dongyan ^a   Zhang, Zuoshuang ^a   Zhang, Donglin ^b   Zhang, Qixiang ^c   Li, Jianhua ^d  

^a Beijing Botanical Garden   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^c BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breeding; Conservation; Cultivar; DNA; Identification

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; CULTIVATION; DNA; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PLANTS (BOTANY);

GENETIC RELATIONSHIP; ORNAMENTAL PEACH;

FRUITS;

BREEDING; CONSERVATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; IDENTIFICATION; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PLANTS; PRUNUS; VARIETIES;

PRUNUS; PRUNUS DAVIDIANA; PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 24944473913     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.40.6.1782     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aranzana, M.J., M.C. Vicente, and P. Arus. 2001. Comparison of fruit and leaf DNA extracts for AFLP and SSR analysis in Peach (Prunus persica). Acta Hort. 546:297-300.
2. Aranzana, M.J., J. Carbo, and P. Arus. 2003. Using amplified fragrant-length polymorphisms (AFLPs) to identify peach cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128:672-677.
3. Chen, J., R.J. Henny, D.J. Norman, P.S. Devanand, and C.C.T. Chao. 2004. Analysis of genetic relatedness of Dieffenbachia cultivars using AFLP markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129:81-87.
4. Debener, T. 2002. Molecular markers as a tool for analysis of genetic relatedness and selection on ornamentals, p. 329-345. In: A. Vainstein (ed.). Breeding for ornamentals: classical and molecular approaches. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, U.K.
5. Devanand, P.S., J. Chen, R.J. Henny, and C.C.T. Chao. 2004. Assessment of genetic relationships among Philodendron cultivars using AFLP markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 129:690-697.
6. Dirlewanger, E., S. Duha, M.A. Viruel, and R. Saunier. 1998. Identification of peach varieties using molecular markers. Acta Hort. 465:69-78.
7. Dirr, M.A. 1998. Manual of woody landscape plants: their identification, ornamental characteristics, culture, propagation and uses. 5th ed. Stipes Publishing, Champaign, Ill.
8. Everett, T.H. 1967. New illustrated encyclopedia of gardening. N.Y. Bot. Garden Press, New York.
9. Goulao, L., L. Monte-Corvo, and C.M. Oliver. 2001. Phenetic characterization of cultivars of plum (Prunus sp.) by high multiplex ratio markers: Aplified fragment length polymorphism and inter-simple sequence repeats. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126:72-77.
10. Hu, D. and X. Zhang. 2001. Breeding of early ornamental peach cultivars (In Chinese). J. Beijing For. Univ. 23:39-40.
11. Hu, D., Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and Q. Zhang. 2003. The Germplasm preservation of ornamental peach cultivars. Acta Hort. 620:395-402.
12. Jacobson, A.L. 1996. North American landscape trees. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, Calif.
13. Krussmann, G. 1986. Manual of cultivated broadleaved trees and shrubs. Timber Press, Portland, Ore.
14. Manubens, A., S. Lobos, Y. Jadue, M. Toro, R. Messina, M. Liadser, and D. Seelenfreund. 1999. DNA isolation and AFLP fingerprinting of nectarine and peach varieties (Prunus persica). Plant Mol. Biol. Rpt. 17:255-267.
15. Ming, J. and Q. Zhang. 2003. Identification of Meiflower cultivars using AFLP fingerprint (in Chinese). J. Beijing For. Univ. 25(Spec.):46-48.
16. Moore, J.N., R.C. Rom, S.A. Brown, and G.L. Klingaman. 1993. 'Bonfire' dwarf peach, 'Leprechaun' dwarf nectarine, 'Crimson Cascade' and 'Pink Cascade' weeping peaches. HortScience 28:854.
17. Pejic, I., P. Ajmone-Marsan, M. Morgante, V. Kozumplick, P. Castiglion, G. Taramino, and M. Motto. 1998. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, SSRs, and AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:1248-1255.
18. Pooler, M.R. 2003. Molecular genetic diversity among 12 clones of Lagerstroemia fauriei revealed by AFLP and RAPD markers. HortScience 38:256-259.
19. Powell, W., M. Morgante, C. Andre, M. Hanafey, J. Vogel, S. Tingey, and A. Rafalski. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP, and SSR markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breed. 2:225-238.
20. Russell, J.R., J.D. Fuller, M. Macaulay, B.J. Hatz, A. Jahoor, W. Powell, and R. Waugh. 1997. Direct comparison of level of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs, and RAPDs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:714-722.
21. Shimada, T., T. Yamamoto, H. Yaegaki, M. Yamaguchi, M. Yoshida, and T. Hayashi. 1998. Application of AFLP to molecular genetic analysis in peach. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68(1):67-69.
22. Struss, D., M. Boritzki, K. Glozer, and S.M. Southwick. 2001. Detection of genetic diversity among populations of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) by AFLPs. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 76:362-367.
23. Struss, D., R. Ahmad, S.M. Southwick, and M. Boritzki. 2003. Analysis of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using SSR and AFLP markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128: 904-909.
24. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
25. Tavaud, M., A. Zanetto, F. Santi, and E. Dirlewanger. 2001. Structuration of genetic diversity in cultivated and wild cherry varieties using molecular markers. Acta Hort. 546:263-269.
26. Tomkins, J.P., T.C. Wood, A. Westman, and R.A. Wing, 2001. Evaluation of genetic variation in the daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) using AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:489-496.
27. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
28. Werner, D.J., S.M. Worthington, and L.K. Snelling. 2000a. Peach tree named 'Corinthian Mauve'. U.S. Patent PP11576.
29. Werner, D.J., S.M. Worthington, and L.K. Snelling. 2000b. Peach tree named 'Corinthian Rose'. U.S. Patent PP11504.
30. Werner, D.J., S.M. Worthington, and L.K. Snelling. 2000c. Peach tree named 'Corinthian White'. U.S. Patent PP11493.
31. Werner, D.J., S.M. Worthington, and L.K. Snelling. 2001. Peach tree named 'Corinthian Pink'. U.S. Patent PP11902.
32. Yamazaki, K., M. Okabe, and E. Takahashi. 1987. New broomy flowering peach cultivars 'Terutebeni', 'Terutemomo', and 'Teruteshiro' (in Japanese). Bul. Kanagawa Hort. Expt. Sta. 34:54-56.
33. Yoshida, M. and K. Seike. 1974. 'Red Dwarf', the new red-dwarf peach (in Japanese). Bul. Fruit Tree Res. Sta. A(1):25-32.
34. Yoshida, M., K. Yamane, Y. Ijiro, N. Fujishige, M. Yamaguchi, and E. Takahashi. 2000. Studies on ornamental peach cultivars. Bul. College Agr. Utsunomiya Univ. 17(3):1-14.
35. Zhang, C. 1998. Studies on evolution relationships between ornamental peach cultivars (in Chinese). MS thesis. Beijing For. Univ.
36. Zhang, D., M.A. Dirr, and R.A. Price. 2000. Discrimination and genetic diversity of Cephalotaxus accessions using AFLP markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125:404-412.
37. Zhang, X., Y. Wang, and G. Wang. 1997. Observation and comparisons on the pollen morphology of peach-blossom cultivars germplasm resources (in Chinese). J. Beijing For. Univ. 19(2):57-62.
38. Zhou, C. and S. Dai. 2002. Analysis on Dendrathema using AFLP (in Chinese). J. Beijing For. Univ. 10:71-75.
39. Zhou, L., F. Kappel, C. Hampson, P.A. Wiersma, and G. Bakkeren. 2002. Genetic analysis and discrimination of sweet cherry cultivars and selections using amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprints. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127:786-792.