Using amplified fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLPs) to identify peach cultivars

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 128, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 672-677

  Aranzana, Maria José ^a,b   Carbó, Joaquim ^a   Arús, Pere ^a  

^a IRTA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

AFLPs; Genetic variability; Molecular markers; Nectarine; Peach; SSRs

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; PRUNUS; PRUNUS PERSICA; PRUNUS PERSICA NUCIPERSICA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS PHAGE 187;

EID: 0042123735     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.128.5.0672     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aranzana, M.J., J. Garcia-Mas, J. Carbó, and P. Arús. 2002. Development and variability analysis of microsatellite markers in peach. Plant Breeding 121:87-92.
2. Aranzana, M.J., J. Carbó, and P. Arús. 2003. Microsatellite variability in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch.]: Cultivar identification, marker mutation, pedigree inferences and population structure. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:1341-1352.
3. Arulsekar, S., D.E. Parffitt, and D.E. Kester. 1986. Comparison of isozyme variability in peach and almond cultivars. J. Hered. 77:272-274.
4. Byrne, D.H. 1990. Isozyme variability in four diploid stone fruits compared with other woody perennial plants. J. Hered. 81:68-71.
5. Cervera, M.T., J.A. Cabezas, J.C. Sancha, F. Martínez-de-Toda, and J.M. Martínez-Zapater. 1998. Application of AFLPs to the characterization of grapevine Vitis vinifera L. genetic resources. A case study with accessions from Rioja (Spain). Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:51-59.
6. de Riek, J., E. Calsyn, I. Everaert, E. Van Bockstaele, and M. De Loose. 2001. AFLP based alternatives for the assessment of distictness, uniformity and stability of sugar beet varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:1254-1265.
7. Dirlewanger, E., S. Duha, M.A. Viruel, and R. Saunier. 1998. Identification of peach varieties using molecular markers. Acta Hort. 465:69-78.
8. Jaccard, P. 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bul. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 44:223-270.
9. Kumar, S., K. Tamura, and M. Nei. 1993. MEGA: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software, version 1.0. Pa. State Univ., Univ. Park, Pa.
10. Lu, Z.X., B. Sosinski, G.L. Reighard, W.V. Baird, and A.G. Abbott. 1998. Construction of a genetic linkage map and identification of AFLP markers for resistance to root-knot nematodes in peach rootstocks. Genome 41:199-207.
11. Messeguer, R., P. Arús, and M. Carrera. 1987. Identification of peach cultivars with pollen isozymes. Scientia Hort. 31:107-117.
12. Okie, W.R., D.W. Ramming, and R. Scorza. 1985. Peach, nectarine and other stone fruit breeding by the USDA in the last two decades. HortScience 20:633-641.
13. Okie, W.R. 1998. Handbook of peach and nectarine varieties. Agr. Res. Serv., Byron, Ga.
14. Pejic, I., P. Ajmone-Marsan, M. Morgante, V. Kozumplick, P. Castiglioni, G. Taramino, and M. Motto. 1998. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:1248-1255.
15. Powell, W., M. Morgante, C. Andre, M. Hanafey, J. Vogel, S. Tingey, and A. Rafalski. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breeding 2:225-238.
16. Quarta, R., M.T. Dettori, I. Verde, U. Marchesi, and A. Palombi. 2000. Characterization and evaluation of genetic diversity in peach germplasm using RAPD and RFLP. Acta Hort. 546:489-496.
17. Rohlf ,F.J., 1994. NTSYS-pc. version 2.1. Exeter Software, Setauket, N.Y.
18. Russell, J.R., J.D. Fuller, M. Macaulay, B.J. Hatz, A. Jahoor, W. Powell, and R. Waugh. 1997. Direct comparison of levels of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs and RAPDs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:714-722.
19. Santos, J., J.M. Aramburu, and I. Batlle, 2001. La recuperació del préssec 'Canonogí'. Catalunya Rural i Agrària 82:19-21.
20. Scorza, R. and W.R. Okie 1990. Peaches (Prunus), p. 175-231. In: J.R. lington and J.N. Moore (eds.). Genetic resources of temperate fruits and nut crops. Intl. Soc. Hort. Sci., The Netherlands.
21. Testolin, R., T. Marrazzo, G. Cipriani, R. Quarta, I. Verde, M.T. Dettori, M. Pancaldi, and S. Sansavini. 2000. Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome 43:512-520.
22. Vinatzer, B., M. Pancaldi, and S. Sansavini. 1999. Potenzialità e limiti del "fingerprinting" nell'identificazione varietale del pesco. Frutticoltura 4:97-101.
23. Viruel, M.A., R. Messeguer, M.C. de Vicente, J. García-Mas, P. Puigdomènech, F. Vargas, and P. Arús. 1995. A linkage map with RFLP and isozyme markers for almond. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:964-971.
24. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl. Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
25. Warburton, M.L. and F.A. Bliss. 1996. Genetic diversity in peach (Prunus persica L. Batch) revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers and compared to inbreeding coefficients. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:1012-1019.
26. Werner, D.J. and W.R. Okie. 1998. A history and description of the Prunus persica plant introduction collection. HortScience 33:787-793.
27. Zhang, L.H., P. Ozias-Akins, G. Kochert, S. Kresovich, R. Dean, and W. Hanna. 1999. Differentiation of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) genotypes by AFLP analyses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:895-902.