The appropriateness of the systematic framework to develop diagnosis procedures of nuclear power plants - An experimental verification

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 53-65

  Park, Jinkyun ^a   Jung, Wondea ^a  

^a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Diagnosis performance; Diagnosis procedure; Emergency operating procedure; Nuclear power plant; Systematic framework

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; SIMULATORS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

DIAGNOSIS PERFORMANCE; DIAGNOSIS PROCEDURE; EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE; SYSTEMATIC FRAMEWORK;

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS;

EID: 24644485287     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. M.H. Morgenstern, M.J. Clausen, L.O. Foley, G.W. Levy, L.B. Myers, and W.L. Rankin Guidelines for preparing emergency procedures for nuclear power plants NUREG/CR-1977 1981 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC
2. P.E. MacDonald, V.N. Shah, L.W. Ward, and P.G. Ellison Steam generator tube failures NUREG/CR-6365 1996 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC
3. W.R. Corcoran, V.M. Callaghan, G.C. Bischoff, R.T. Pearce, and J.H. Barrow Transient management using the safety function approach P.L. Lassahn D. Majumdar G.F. Brockett Anticipated and abnormal plant transients in light water reactors vol. 2 1984 Plenum Press New York 1059 1072
4. R.C. Surman, B.S. Monty, M.E. Stella, H.V. Julian, and R.A. Newton Guidance for control room emergency operation P.L. Lassahn D. Majumdar G.F. Brockett Anticipated and abnormal plant transients in light water reactors vol. 2 1984 Plenum Press New York 1083 1097
5. International Atomic Energy Agency Developments in the preparation of operating procedures for emergency conditions of nuclear power plants IAEA-TECDOC-341, Vienna 1985
6. D.H. Williams Abnormal transient operating procedures P.L. Lassahn D. Majumdar G.F. Brockett Anticipated and abnormal plant transients in light water reactors vol. 2 1984 Plenum Press New York 1177 1186
7. T. Kontogiannis Stress and operator decision making in coping with emergencies Int J Hum Comput Interact 45 1996 75 104
8. Bongarra JP Jr, Persensky JJ. Implementing requirements for upgrading emergency operating procedures: a regulatory perspective. In: Proceedings of IEEE fourth conference on human factors and power plants; 1988. p. 208-13.
9. D.D. Woods Coping with complexity: the psychology of human behavior in complex systems L.P. Goodstein H.B. Anderson S.E. Olsen Tasks, errors, and mental models 1998 Taylor and Francis London 128 148
10. B. Vaudrey, J. Patrick, and P. Halliday Training to break the barriers of habit in diagnosing unusual faults Nucl Eng Int August 1999 15 18
11. Underwood WE. A CSA model-based nuclear power plant consultant. In: Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence. Pittsburgh, PA; 1982. p. 302-05.
12. P.V. Varde, S. Sankar, and A.K. Verma An operator support system for research reactor operations and fault diagnosis through a connectionist framework and PSA based knowledge based systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 60 1 1993 53 69
13. C. Palmer, and P.W.H. Chung Verifying signed directed graph models for process plants Comput Chem Eng Suppl 1990 S391 S394
14. Depond G, Resse L. Operating procedures for emergency situations in EdF PWR plants. In: Proceedings of IAEA international training course on accident management in nuclear power plants; 1989. p. 1-12.
15. Batistic JA. Embalse NGS: abnormal event procedures development lifecycle. In: Proceedings of a specialist meeting organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna; 1992.
16. Muller RE, Moser HJ, Roth-Seefrid H. The new modular emergency procedure concept for SIEMENS PWRs. In: Proceedings of a specialist meeting organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna; 1992.
17. Nuclear Energy Agency Critical operator actions: human reliability modeling and data issues NEA/CSNI/R(98)1 1998
18. J. Park, and W. Jung A study on the systematic framework to develop effective diagnosis procedures of nuclear power plants Reliab Eng Syst Saf 84 3 2004 319 335
19. CE Owner's Group. Combustion engineering emergency response guidance. CEN-152, Rev. 04; 1996.
20. J. Park, W. Jung, J. Kim, J. Ha, and Y. Shin The step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures - comparing with simulation data Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74 1 2001 63 74
21. J. Park, W. Jung, J. Ha, and C. Park The step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures: measure verification Reliab Eng Syst Saf 77 1 2002 45 59
22. J. Park, and W. Jung The requisite characteristics for diagnosis procedures based on the empirical findings of the operators' behavior under emergency situations Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81 2 2003 197 213
23. J. Park, and W. Jung The operators' non-compliance behavior to conduct emergency operating procedures - comparing with the complexity of the procedural steps J Korean Nucl Soc 35 5 2003 412 425
24. J. Park, W. Jung, J. Kim, and J. Ha A study on the systematic framework to develop an effective diagnosis procedure of the nuclear power plants Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, KAERI-TR-2597 2003
25. T. Cox, and S. Cox Work-related stress and control-room operations in nuclear power generation N. Stanton Human factors in nuclear safety 1996 Taylor & Francis London
26. J.W. Payne, J.R. Bettman, and E.J. Johnson Adaptive strategy selection in decision making J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 14 3 1988 534 552
27. A. Zuzek, A. Biasizzo, and F. Novak Sequential diagnosis tool Microprocessors Microsyst 24 2000 191 197
28. K.R. Pattipati, and M.G. Alexandridis Application of heuristic search and information theory to sequential fault diagnosis IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20 4 1990 872 887
29. H. Zhou, L. Qu, and A. Li Test sequencing and diagnosis in electronic systems with decision table Microelectron Reliab 36 9 1996 1167 1175
30. N. Morray Advanced displays, cultural stereotypes and organizational characteristics of a control room J. Misumi B. Wilpert R. Miller Nuclear safety: a human factors perspective 1999 Taylor and Francis New York
31. R.L. Henneman, and W.B. Rouse Measures of human problem solving performance in fault diagnosis tasks IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-14 1 1982 99 652
32. D.H. Ham, and W.C. Yoon The effects of presenting functionally abstracted information in fault diagnosis tasks Reliab Eng Syst Saf 73 2 2001 103 119
33. W.B. Johnson, and W.B. Rouse Analysis and classification of human errors IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-12 3 1982 389 393
34. R.M. Hunt, and W.B. Rouse Problem-solving skills of maintenance trainees in diagnosis faults in simulated power plants Hum Factors 23 3 1981 317 328
35. J. Park, W. Jung, J. Kim, and J. Ha Step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures - determining weighting factors Nucl Technol 143 3 2003 290 308
36. S.G. Hart, and L.E. Staveland Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research P.A. Hancock N. Meshkati Human mental workload 1988 Elsevier North-Holland 139 183
37. T.E. Nygren Psychometric properties of subjective workload measurement techniques: implications for their use in the assessment of perceived mental workload Hum Factors 33 1 1991 17 33
38. Y. Liu, and C.D. Wickens Mental workload and cognitive task automaticity: an evaluation of subjective and time estimation metrics Ergonomics 37 11 1994 1843 1854
39. S.G. Hill, H.P. Iavecchia, J.C. Byers, A.C. Bittner Jr, A.L. Zaklad, and R.E. Christ Comparison of four subjective workload rating scale Hum Factors 24 4 1992 429 439
40. K.C. Hendy, K.M. Hamilton, and L.N. Landry Measuring subjective workload: when is one scale better than many? Hum Factors 35 4 1993 579 601
41. J. Dickinson, W.D. Byblow, and L.A. Ryan Order effects and the weighting process in workload assessment Appl Ergon 24 5 1993 357 361
42. S. Miyake Multivariate workload evaluation combining physiological and subjective measures Int J Psychophysiol 40 2001 233 238
43. J.J. Bartko The interclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability Psychol Rep 19 1966 3 11
44. J.J. Bartko On various interclass correlation reliability coefficients Psychol Bull 83 1976 762 765