The step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures - Comparing with simulation data

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 63-74

  Park, Jinkyun ^a   Jung, Wondea ^a   Kim, Jaewhan ^a   Ha, Jaejoo ^a   Shin, Yunghwa ^b  

^a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

^b Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Complexity factors; Emergency operating procedures; Entropy; Measure validations; Nuclear power plants; Step complexity quantification; Step performance time

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; ENTROPY; ERROR ANALYSIS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

STEP COMPLEXITY MEASURES;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035479743     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00063-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aviation human factors: A framework for the new millennium
2. Trends in major industrial accidents in Germany
3. Task analysis for industrial work process from aspects of human reliability and system safety
4. Development and evaluation of the maintenance error decision aid (MEDA) process
5. Optimising procedures in manufacturing systems
6. APRECIH: A human unreliability analysis method - Application to railway system
7. Human factors engineering program review model
8. Research strategies for human performance
9. Guidelines for the preparation of emergency operating procedures
10. Evaluation of emergency operating procedures for nuclear power plants
11. Checklist for evaluating emergency operating procedure used in nuclear power plants
12. Development of a checklist for evaluating emergency operating procedures used in nuclear power plants
13. Emergency response guidance
14. Development of the step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures using entropy concepts
15. Cockpit checklists: Concepts, design and use
16. Guidelines for computerized presentation of emergency operating procedures
17. Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales
18. Psychometric properties of subjective workload measurement techniques: Implications for their use in the assessment of perceived mental workload