Meeting industry and regulatory needs for alternative test methods to the draize rabbit eye irritation test

Alternative Toxicological Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 77-88

  Ward, Sherry L ^a  

^a U S ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH AND MATERIEL COMMAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644479938     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Bagley, D.M., Waters, D., and Kong, B.M. (1994) Development of a 10-day chorioallantoic membrane assay as an alternative to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test, Fund. Chem. Toxicol, 32, 1155-1160.
2. Balls, M. (1997) The three Rs concept of alternatives to animal experimentation, in Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics, van Zutphen, L.F.M. and Balls, M., Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 27-41.
3. Balls, M., Blaauboer, B.J., Fentem, J.H., Bruner, I., Combes, R.D., Ekwall, B., Fielder, R.J., Guillouzo, A., Lewis, R.W., Lovell, D.P, Reinhardt, C.A., Repetto, G., Sladowski, D., Spielmann, H., and Zucco, F. (1995) Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of the ECVAM Workshop 5, Alt. Lab. Anim., 23, 129-147.
4. Beckley, J.H. (1965) Comparative eye testing: man versus animal, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 7, 93-101.
5. Beckley, J.H., Russell, T.J., and Rubin, L.F. (1969) Use of the rhesus monkey for predicting human response to eye irritants, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 15, 1-9.
6. Blazka, M.E., Casterton, PL., Dressler, W.E., Edelhauser, H.F., Kruszewski, F.H., McCulley, J.P, Nussenblatt, R.B., Osborne, R., Rothenstein, A., Stitzel, K.A., Thomas, K., and Ward, S.L. (2003) Proposed new classification scheme for chemical injury to the human eye, in preparation.
7. Chambers, W. (2000) Regulatory perspective—Meeting regulatory agency needs for Draize alternatives, Alternative Toxicological Methods for the New Millennium Program Guide, U.S. Army (DoD), Bethesda, MD, 33.
8. Clothier, R., Orme, A., Walker, T.L., Ward, S.L., Kruszewski, F.H., DiPasquale, L.C., and Broadhead, C.L. (2000) A comparison of three cytotoxicity assays using the corneal HCE-T model, Alt. Lab. Anim., 28, 293-302.
9. DiPasquale, L.C. and Hayes, A.W. (2001) Acute toxicity and eye irritancy, in Principles and Methods of Toxicology, 4th ed., Hayes, A.W., Ed., Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, 853-916.
10. Draize, J.H., Woodard, G., and Calvery, H.O. (1944) Method for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther, 82, 377-389.
11. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1996) Health effects test guidelines, 870.2400 Acute eye irritation, url: www.epa.gov.
12. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (1998) Animal use in testing FDA-regulated products, url: http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov.
13. Friedenwald, J.S., Hughes, W.F., and Herrmann, H. (1944) Acid-base tolerance of the cornea, Arch. Ophthalmol. 31, 279-283.
14. Gautheron, P, Dukic, M., Alix, D., and Sina, J.F. (1992) Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: an in vitro assay of ocular irritancy, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 18, 442-449.
15. Gershbein, L.L. and McDonald, J.E. (1977) Evaluation of the corneal irritancy of test shampoos and detergents in various animal species, Food Cosmet. Toxicol., 15, 131-134.
16. Green, W.R., Sullivan, J.B., Hehir, R.M., Scharpf, L.G., and Dickinson, A.W. (1978) A Systematic Comparison of Chemically Induced Eye Injury in the Albino Rabbit and Rhesus Monkey, The Soap and Detergent Association, New York.
17. ICCVAM (Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods) (1999) Evaluation of the Validation Status of Toxicological Methods: General Guidelines for Submissions to ICCVAM (NIH Publication 99-4496), url: http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/guidelines/subguide.htm.
18. ICCVAM-NICEATM (2002) Test methods under review, url: http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/review. htm.
19. ILSI AAT (International Life Sciences Institute Technical Committee on Alternatives to Animal Testing) (1996) Replacing the Draize eye irritation test: scientific background and research needs, J. Toxicol. Cutaneous Ocular Toxicol., 15, 211-234.
20. Kahn, C.R. and Walker, T.L. (1993) Human corneal epithelial cell lines with extended lifespan: transepithelial permeability across membranes formed in vitro, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 34, 1010.
21. Klausner, M., Sheasgreen, J., Breyfogle, B., Sennott, H., Liebsch, M., Kubilus, J. (1999) The EpiOcular prediction model: a reproducible in vitro means of assessing ocular irritancy potential, Alt. Lab. Anim., 27, 299.
22. Kruszewski, F.H., Walker, T.L., and DiPasquale, L.C. (1997) Evaluation of a human corneal epithelial cell line as an in vitro model for assessing ocular irritation, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 36, 130-140.
23. Lovell, D.P (1996) Principal component analysis of Draize eye irritation tissue scores from 72 samples of 55 chemicals in the ECETOC data bank, Toxicol. In Vitro, 10, 609-618.
24. NIEHS (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences) (1997) Validation and regulatory acceptance of toxicological test methods: a report of the ad hoc Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (NIH publication 97-3981). NIEHS: Research Triangle Park, NC, url: http://ntp-server.mehs. nih.gov/htdocs/ICCVAM/ICCVAM.html or http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/guide-lines/validate.pdf.
25. Nussenblatt, R., Bron, A., Chambers, W., McCulley, J., Pericoi, M., Ubels, J., and Edelhauser, H. (1998) Ophthalmologic perspectives on eye irritation testing, J. Toxicol. Cutaneous Ocular Toxicol., 17, 103-109.
26. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1996) Final report of the OECD Workshop on harmonization of validation and acceptance criteria for alternative toxicological test methods (ENV/MC/CHEM/TG(96)9), OECD, Paris.
27. Purchase, I.F., Botham, PA., Bruner, L.H., Flint, O.P, Frazier, J.M., and Stokes, W.S. (1998) Workshop overview: scientific and regulatory challenges for the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animals in toxicity testing, Toxicol. Sci, 43, 86-101.
28. Russell, W.M.S., and Burch, R.L. (1959, reprinted 1992) The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Herts, U.K.
29. Spielmann, H. (1997) Ocular irritation, in In Vitro Methods in Pharmaceutical Research, Academic Press, New York, 265-287.
30. Stern, M., Klausner, M., Alvarado, R., Renskers, K., and Dickens, M. (1998) Evaluation of the EpiOcular™ tissue model as an alternative to the Draize eye irritation test, Toxicol In Vitro, 12, 455-461.
31. Utterback, J.M. (1994) Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press: Boston.
32. Walker, A.P (1985) A more realistic animal technique for predicting human eye response, Food Chem. Toxicol., 23, 175-178.
33. Ward, S.L., Walker, T.L., and Dimitrijevich, S.D. (1997) Evaluation of chemically-induced toxicity using an in vitro model of human corneal epithelium, Toxicol. in Vitro, 11, 121-139.
34. Ward, S.L. et al. (2000) Pre-Study Plan for the Validation of the HCE-T TEP Assay. Submission to the ICCVAM Ocular Toxicity Working Group (OTWG).
35. Ward, S.L., Gacula, M., Jr., Cao, C., DiPasquale, L., Edelhauser, H., Kruszewski, F., Valdes, J., Walker, T., and Hayes, A.W. (2003) Prevalidation study results for the human corneal epithelial fluorescein transepithelial permeability assay for eye irritation, the HCE-T TEP assay, J. Toxicol. Cutaneous Ocular Toxicol., submitted.
36. Weil, C.S. and Scala, R.A. (1971) Study of intra- and inter-laboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation test, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 19, 276-360.
37. Wilhelmus, K.R. (2001) The Draize eye test, Surv. Ophthalmol., 45, 493-515.
38. Williams, PD. (1994) Alternatives to ocular testing in vivo: scientific and regulatory considerations, Toxicol. Methods, 4, 24-25.