Ophthalmologic perspectives on eye irritation testing

Journal of Toxicology - Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 17, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 103-109

  Nussenblatt, Robert B ^a   Bron, Anthony ^b   Chambers, Wiley ^c   McCulley, James P ^d   Pericoi, Marc ^e   Ubels, John L ^f   Edelhauser, Henry F ^g   Porter, Lea ^h  

^a NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e PERITESCO   (France)

^f CALVIN COLLEGE   (United States)

^g EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h ILSI HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; EYE IRRITATION; EYE TOXICITY; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; REVIEW; TISSUE CULTURE; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 0031689017     PISSN: 07313829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/15569529809049311     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Test for eye irritants, Federal Hazardous Substances Act, Title 21, C.F.R., Fed. Reg. 13009-191.12, 1964.
2. J. H. Draize, G. Woodard, and H. O. Calvery, Method for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82: 377-389, 1944.
3. J. S. Friedenwald, W. F. Hughes, and H. Herrmann, Acid-base tolerance of the cornea, Arch. Ophthalmol. 31: 279-283, 1944.
4. European Commission, Council Directive 93/95/EEC, Sixth Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC, Luxembourg, 1993.
5. European Commission, Commission Directive 97/18/EEC, Luxembourg, 1997.
6. J. A. Bradlaw and N. L. Wilcox, Workshop on eye irritation testing: Practical applications of non-whole animal alternatives, Food Chem. Tox. 35: 1-11, 1997.
7. M. Balls, P. A. Botham, L. H. Bruner, and H. Spielmann, The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test, Toxicol. In Vitro 9: 871-929, 1996.
8. P. G. Brantom, L. H. Bruner, O. de Silva, J. Dupuis, L. K. Earl, D. P. Lovell, and W. J. W. Pape, The COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the rabbit eye irritation test (abstract), ATLA 24 (Spec. Issue.): 87, 1996.
9. W. M. Grant and J. S. Schuman, Toxicology of the Eye, 4th ed., Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1993.
10. J. H. Beckley, Comparative eye testing: Man vs. animal, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 7: 93-101, 1965.
11. J. H. Beckley, T. J. Russell, and L. F. Rubin, Use of the rhesus monkey for predicting human response to eye irritants, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 15: 1-9, 1969.
12. F. E. Freeberg, G. A. Nixon, P. J. Reer, J. E. Weaver, R. D. Bruce, J. F. Griffith, and L. W. Sanders III, Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult, Fundam. Appl, Toxicol. 7: 626-634, 1986.
13. P. L. Casterton, L. F. Potts, and B. D. Klein, A novel approach to assessing eye irritation using the bovine corneal opacity and permeability test, J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocul. Toxicol. 15: 147-163, 1996.
14. P. Gautherton, M. Dukic, D. Alix, and J. F. Sina, Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: An in vitro assay of ocular irritancy, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 18: 442-449, 1992.
15. E. V. Buehler and E. A. Newmann, A comparison of eye irritation in monkeys and rabbits, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 6: 701-710, 1964.
16. L. L. Gershbein and J. E. McDonald, Evaluation of the corneal irritancy of test shampoos and detergents in various animal species, Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 15: 131-134, 1977.
17. W. R. Green, J. B. Sullivan, R. M. Hehir, L. G. Scharpf, and A. W. Dickinson, A systematic comparison of chemically induced eye injury in the albino rabbit and rhesus monkey, New York, Soap & Detergent Association, 1978.