How rational are we?

Psychologist

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 76-79

  Hardman, David ^a   Harries, Clare ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24644475302     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Ayton, P. & Wright, G. (1994). Subjective probability:What should we believe? In G.Wright & P.Ayton (Eds.) Subjective probability. Chichester:Wiley.
2. Baron, J. (1994a). Nonconsequentialist decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 1-41
3. Baron, J. (1994b). Thinking and deciding (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baron, J. (1998). Judgment misguided: Intuition and error in public decision making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Baron,J. & Brown, R.V.(1991). Why Americans can't think straight. In J. Baron & R.V. Brown (Eds.) Teaching decision making to adolescents. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Baron, J. & Jurney,J. (1993). Norms against voting for coerced reform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 347-355.
7. Borges, B., Goldstein, D.G., Ortmann, A. & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). Can ignorance beat the stock market? In G. Gigerenzer, P.M.Todd and the ABC Research Group (Eds.) Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp.59-72). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science Vol. I no. 10. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Clemen, R.T. (1999). Does decision analysis work? A research agenda. Draft manuscript. Duke University, North Carolina.
10. Connolly,T.,Arkes, H.R. & Hammond, K.R. (Eds.) (2000). Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Cooksey, R.W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1-73.
13. Doherty, M.E. & Kurz, E.M. (1996). Social Judgement Theory. Tninking and Reasoning, 2(2/3), 109-140.
14. Evans, J.StB. T., Handley, S.J., Perham, N., Over, D.E. & Thompson, V.A. (2000). Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems. Cognition, 77(3), 197-213.
15. Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D.G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669.
16. Gigerenzer, G. & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704.
17. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M. and the ABC Research Group (Eds.) (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart New York; Oxford University Press.
18. Hammond, K.R. & Stewart, T.R. (Eds.) (2001). The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Harries, C. & Harvey, N. (2000). Are absolute frequencies, relative frequencies, or both effective in reducing cognitive biases? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 431-444.
20. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
21. Kahneman, D. & Lovallo, D. (1993).Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17-31.
22. Kahneman, D. Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Klayman, J. & Brown, K. (1993). Debias the environment instead of the judge - An alternative approach to reducing error in diagnostic (and other) judgment. Cognition. 49, 97-122.
24. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: Hew people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Lopes, LL (1991). The rhetoric of irrationality. Theory & Psychology, 1(1), 65-82.
26. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. & Johnson, E.J. (1993). The adoptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Schneider, S.L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1040-1057.
28. Shafir, E., Simonson, I. &Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
29. Simon, H.A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.
30. Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York Wiley.
31. Tversky, A (1972). Elimination by aspects:A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
32. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: Conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
33. Wang, X.T. (1996). Framing effects: dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 145-157.