Resistant starch supplementation influences blood lipid concentrations and glucose control in overweight subjects

Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 93-99

  Park, Ock Jin ^a   Kang, Nam E ^b   Chang, Moon Jeong ^c   Kim, Woo Kyoung ^d  

^a Hannam University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul Health Junior College   (South Korea)

^c Kookmin University   (South Korea)

^d Dankook University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Blood lipid concentrations; Glucose control; Overweight subjects; Resistant starch

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; COMPLEMENT COMPONENT C3; GLUCOSE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G; INSULIN; LIPID; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; RESISTANT STARCH; STARCH; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BODY WEIGHT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; DIGESTION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HUMORAL IMMUNITY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INSULIN BLOOD LEVEL; INTESTINE; LIPID BLOOD LEVEL; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; OBESITY; PALATABILITY; RISK FACTOR;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 2442716129     PISSN: 03014800     EISSN: 18817742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3177/jnsv.50.93     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Euresta (European Flair Concerted Action on Resistant Starch). 1993. Newsletter IV. Department of Human Nutrition, Wageningen Agriculture University.
2. Wisker E. 1997. Physiological effects of resistant starch-Part 1: Definition, intake with food, and influence on glucose, insulin and lipid plasma levels. Ernnahrungs-umschau 47: 10-15.
3. de Deckere EAM, Kloots WJ, van Amelsvoort JMM. 1993. Resistant starch decreases serum total cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations and fat accretion in the rat. Br J Nutr 73: 74-76.
4. de Deckere EAM, Kloots WJ, van Amelsvoort JMM. 1995. Both raw and retrograded starch decrease serum triacylglycerol concentration and fat accretion in the rat. Br J Nutr 72: 287-298.
5. Younes H, Levrat MA, Demigne C, Remesy C. 1995. Resistant starch is more effective than cholestyramine as a lipid-lowering agent in the rat. Lipids 30: 847-853.
6. Vanhoof K, de Schrijver R. 1997. Consumption of enzyme-resistant starch and cholesterol metabolism in normo- and hypercholesterolemic rats. Nutr Res 17: 1331-1340.
7. Levrat MA, Moundras C, Younes H, Morand C, Demigne C, Remesy C. 1996. Effectiveness of resistant starch. compared to guar gum, in depressing plasma cholesterol and enhancing fecal steroid excretion. Lipids 31: 1069-1075.
8. Haralampu SG. 2000. Resistant starch-a review of the physical properties and biological impact of RS3. Carb Polymers 41: 285-292.
9. van Munster IP, Tangerman A, Nagengast FM. 1994. Effect of resistant starch on colonic fermentation, bile acid metabolism, and mucosal proliferation. Dig Dis Sci 39: 834-842.
10. Phillips J, Muir JG, Birkett A, Lu ZX, Jones GP, O'Dea K, Young GP. 1995. Effect of resistant starch on fecal bulk and fermentation-dependent events in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 62: 121-130.
11. Cheng HH, Lai MH. 2000. Fermentation of resistant rice starch produces propionate reducing serum and hepatic cholesterol in rats. J Nutr 130: 1991-1995.
12. Heijnen MA, van Amelsvoort JMM, Deurenberg P, Beynen AC. 1996. Neither raw nor retrograded resistant starch lowers fasting serum cholesterol concentrations in healthy normolipidemic subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 64: 312-318.
13. Marchini JS, Faisant N, Champ M, Ranganathan S, Azoulay C, Kergueris MF, Piloquet H, Krempf M. 1998. Effects of an acute raw resistant potato starch supplement on postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, lipidemia in healthy adults. Nutr Res 18: 1135-1145.
14. Jenkens DJ, Vuksan V, Kendall CW, Wursch P, Jeffcoat R, Waring S, Mehling CC, Vidgen E, Augustin LS, Wong E. 1998. Physiological effects of resistant starches on fecal bulk, short chain fatty acids, blood lipids and glycemic index. J Am Coll Nutr 17: 609-616.
15. Tappy L, Wursch JP, Randin JP, Felber JP, Jequier E. 1986. Metabolic effect of precooked instant preparations of bean and potato in normal and diabetic subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 43: 30-36.
16. Jenkins DJ, Jenkins AL, Wolever TM, Collier GR, Roo AV, Thompson LV. 1987. Starchy foods and fiber reduced rate of digestion and improved carbohydrate metabolism. Scand J Gastroenterol 22: 132-141.
17. van Amerlsvoort JMM, Westrate JA. 1992. Amylose-amylopectin ratio in a meal affects postprandial variables in male volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr 55: 712-718.
18. Raben A, Tagliabue A, Christensen NJ, Madsen J, Holst JJ, Astrup A. 1994. Resistant starch: the effect on post-prandial glycemia, hormonal response and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 60: 544-551.
19. Reader A, Johnson ML, Hollander P, Franz M. 1997. Response of resistant starch in a food bar vs two commercially available bars in persons with type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 46: 254A.
20. Lilheberg HGM. Akerberg AKE, Bjorck IME. 1999. Effect of the glycemic index and content of indigestible carbohydrates of cereal-based breakfast meals on glucose tolerance at lunch in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 69: 647-655.
21. Wakabayashi S, Kishimoto Y, Nanbu S, Matsuoka A. 1999. Effects of indigestible dextrin on postprandial rise in blood glucose levels in man. J Jpn Assoc Dietary Fiber Res 3: 13-19.
22. Wolf BW, Wolever TMS, Bolognesi C, Zinker BA, Garleb KA. 2001. Glycemic response to a rapidly digested starch is not affected by the addition of an indigestible dextrin in humans. Nutr Res 21: 1099-1106.
23. Chandra RK. 2002. Nutrition and the immune system from birth to old age. Eur J Clin Nutr 56: 73S-76S.
24. Lapidus L, Bengtsson C. 1988. Regional obesity as a health hazard in women-a prospective study. Acta Med Scand S723: 5-59.
25. 2 cholesterol by precipitation with dextran sulfate and magnesium chloride: establishing optimal conditions for rat plasma. Lipids 24: 532-534.
26. Friedwald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. 1972. Estimation of the concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultra-centrifugation. Clin Chem 18: 499-502.
27. Sternberg JC. 1977. A rate nephelometer for measuring specific proteins by immunoprecipitate reaction. Clin Chem 23: 1456-1464.
28. Behall KM, Scholfield DJ, Yuhaniak I, Canary J. 1989. Diets containing high amylose vs amylopectin starch: effects on metabolic variables in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 49: 337-344.
29. Noakes M, Clifton PM, Nestel PJ, LeLeu R, McLntosh G. 1996. Effect of high-amylose starch and oat bran on metabolic variable and bowel function in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Clin Nutr 64: 944-951.
30. Pomeranz Y. 1992. Research and development regarding enzyme-resistant starch (RS) in the USA: a review. Eur J Clin Nutr 46: S63-S69.
31. Bornet F. 1993. Technological treatments of cereals. Discussions on the physiological properties of starch. Carb Polymers 21: 195-203.
32. Muir JG, Lu ZX, Young GP, Cameron SD, Collier GR, O'Dea K. 1995. Resistant starch in the diet increases breath hydrogen and serum acetate in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 61: 792-799.
33. Chen WJL, Anderson JW, Jennings D. 1984. Propionate may mediate the hypocholesterolemic effects of certain soluble plant fibers in cholesterol fed rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 175: 215-218.
34. Hara H, Haga S, Aoyama Y, Kiriyama S. 1999. Short-chain fatty acids suppress cholesterol synthesis in rat liver and intestine. J Nutr 129: 942-948.
35. Bearlieu KE, McBurney MI. 1992. Changes in pig serum lipids, nutrient digestibility and sterol excretion during cecal infusion of propionate. J Nutr 122: 241-245.
36. Fernandez ML, Suheeta R, Vergara JM. 2000. Resistant starch and cholestyramine have distinct effects on hepatic cholesterol metabolism in guinea pigs fed a hypercholesterolemic diet. Nutr Res 20: 837-849.