The "gradient effect" in federal laboratory-industry technology transfer partnerships

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 235-252

  Saavedra, Pablo ^a   Bozeman, Barry ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 2442656311     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00063.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adams, J., Chiang, E., & Jensen, J. (2003). The influence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1003-1020.
2. Aram, J., Lynn, L., & Reddy, N. M. (1992). Institutional relationships and technology commercialization: limitations of market-based policy. Research Policy, 21(5), 409-421.
3. Berman, E. (1994). Technology transfer and federal laboratories. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 338-348.
4. Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 20, 627-655.
5. Bozeman, B., & Papadakis, M. (1995). Company interactions with federal laboratories: What they do and why they do it. Journal of Technology Transfer, 20, 3-4, 64-74.
6. Bozeman, B., Papadakis, M., & Coker, K. (1995). Industry perspectives on commercial interactions with federal R&D laboratories: Does the cooperative technology paradigm really work? Final Report to the National Science Foundation, Research on Science and Technology Program. Atlanta, GA: School of Public Policy.
7. Bozeman, B., & Wittmer, D. (2001). Technical roles and success of US federal laboratory-industry partnerships. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 69-178.
8. Brown, M. A. (1997). Performance metrics for a technology commercialization program. International Journal of Technology Management, 13(3): 229-244.
9. Crow, M., & Bozeman, B. (1998). Limited by design: R&D laboratories in the U.S. national innovation system. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Daghfous, A., & White, G. R. (1994). Information and innovation: A comprehensive representation. Research Policy, 23(3), 267-293.
11. Devine, M., James, T., & Adams, T. (1987). Government supported industry-university research centers: Issues for successful technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 12, 27-37.
12. Dill, D. (1990). University/industry research collaborations: An analysis of inter-organizational relationships. R&D Management, 20(2),123.
13. Eisenhardt, K., & Schoonhoven, C. (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504-529.
14. Feller, I., & Roessner, D. (1995). What does industry expect from university partnerships: Congress wants to see bottom-line results from industry/government programs, but that is not what the participating companies are seeking. Issues in Science and Technology, 12(1), 80-84.
15. Gillespie, G. (1988). Federal laboratories: Economic development and intellectual property constraints. Journal of Technology Transfer, 13(1), 20-26.
16. Ham, R., & Mowery D. (1998). Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration: Case studies at the US Weapons laboratory. Research Policy, 26, 661-675.
17. Herrman, J. (1983). Redefining the federal government's role in technology transfer. Research Management, 26(1): 21-24.
18. Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2001). Intellectual property protection mechanisms and research partnerships. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms in Research Partnerships, Center for International Science and Technology Policy, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
19. Jaffe, A., Fogarty, M., & Banks, B. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 183-205.
20. Jaffe, A. B. (2000). The US patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. Research Policy, 29, 531-557.
21. Kassicieh, S. K., Radosevich, H. R., & Senker, J. (1996). From lab to market-commercialization of public-sector technology. Research Policy, 25(3), 482-484.
22. Lawther, W. (2000). Privatizing toll roads: A public-private partnership. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000.
23. Leyden, D., & Link, A. N. (1999). Federal laboratories as research partners. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(4), 575-592.
24. Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.
25. Link, A. (1996). Evaluating public sector research and development. New York: Praeger.
26. Mowery, D. (1998). Collaborative R&D: How effective is it? Issues in Science and Technology, 15(1): 37-44.
27. National Competitiveness Technology Transfer Act of 1989, P.L. 101-189, enacted November 29, 1989.
28. National Cooperative Research Act of 1984, P.L. 4301-4305, enacted October 11, 1984.
29. Niosi, J. (1995). Flexible Innovation. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
30. Niosi, J., & Bergeron, M. (1992). Technical alliances in the Canadian electronics industry: An empirical analysis. Technovation, 12(5), 309.
31. Patent and Trademark Laws Amendment of 1980. (Bayh-Dole Act) PL96-517, enacted December 12, 1980.
32. Payne, G. (1999). Making common ground: Public private partnerships in land for housing. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
33. Perchorowicz, J. T, Dakin, K. J., & Lindsey, J. (1991). Technology transfer-Financing and commercializing the high tech product or service from research to roll out. Journal of Technology Transfer, 16(3), 62.
34. Piper, W. S., & Naghshpour, S. (1996). Government technology transfer: The effective use of both push and pull marketing strategies. International Journal of Technology Management, 12(1): 85-94.
35. Pisano, G. (1991). The governance of innovation: vertical integration and collaborative agreements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 20, 237-249.
36. Roessner, J. D. (1993). What companies want from the federal lab. Issues in Science and Technology, 10(1), 37-42.
37. Roessner, J. D., & Bean, A. (1991). How industry interacts with federal laboratories. Research Technology Management, 34(4), 22.
38. Roessner, J. D., & Bean, A. (1994). Patterns of Industry Interaction with Federal Laboratories. Journal of Technology Transfer (December): 59-77.
39. Rogers, J., & Bozeman, B. (1997). Basic research and the success of federal lab-industry partnerships. Journal of Technology Transfer, 22(3), 37-48.
40. Rosenau, P (2000). Public-private partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Smilor, R., & Gibson, D. (1991). Accelerating technology transfer in R&D consortia Research Technology Management, 34(1), 44-48.
42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Child Care Bureau. (1998). A guide to successful public-private partnerships for child care. Washington, DC
43. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1989). Technology transfer: Implementation status of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
44. Whiting, M. (1999). Innovative public-private partnerships: Public safety initiatives New York: The Conference Board.
45. Zelman, W. (1996). The changing health care marketplace: Private ventures, public interests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.