Federal laboratories as research partners

International Journal of Industrial Organization

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 575-592

  Leyden, Dennis Patrick ^a   Link, Albert N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

031; 032; 038; Collaborative research; Federal laboratory; Research joint venture

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033422952     PISSN: 01677187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7187(97)00050-7     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anand, B.N., Khanna, T., 1996. Intellectual Property Rights and Contract Structure. Working Paper #3, Working Paper Series H, Yale School of Management, July.
2. Bozeman, B., Crow, M., 1995. Federal Laboratories in the National Innovation System: Policy Implications of the National Comparative Research and Development Project. Georgia Institute of Technology mimeo.
3. Bozeman B., Papadakis M. Companies Interactions with Federal Laboratories: What They Do and Why They Do It. Journal of Technology Transfer. 20:1995;64-74.
4. Bozeman, B., Papadakis, M., Coker. K., 1995. Industry Perspectives on Commercial Interactions with Federal Laboratories. Final Report to the National Science Foundation.
5. Brod, A., Link, A.N., 1996. Trends in Collaborative Research Activity: An Interpretation of the Evidence. Mimeographed.
6. Brodley J.F. Antitrust Law and Innovation Cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 4:1990;91-112.
7. Cohen L. When Can Government Subsidize Research Joint Ventures? Politics, Economics, and Limits to Technology Policy. American Economic Review. 84:1994;159-163.
8. Cohen, W.M., Leventhal, D.A., 1990. In: Smith, V.K., Link, A.N. (Eds.), The Implications of Spillovers for R and D Investment and Welfare: A New Perspective in Advances in Applied Micro-Economics. JAI Press, Greenwich, CO.
9. Cohen W.M., Leventhal D.A. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R and D. The Economic Journal. 99:1989;569-596.
10. Colombo M.G., Garrone P. Technological Cooperative Agreements and Firm's R and D Intensity: A Note on Causality Relations. Research Policy. 25:1996;923-932.
11. Combs K.L. The Role of Information Sharing in Cooperative Research and Development. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 11:1993;535-551.
12. Council on Competitiveness, 1996. Endless Frontier, Limited Resources: U.S. R and D Policy for Competitiveness. Council on Competitiveness, Washington D.C.
13. Cuzzens, S.E., 1995. Assessment of Fundamental Science Programs in the Context of the Government Performance and Results Act GPRA. Critical Technologies Institute, Rand.
14. d'Aspremont C., Jacquemin A. Cooperative and Noncooperative R and D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review. 78:1988;1133-1137.
15. DeBondt, R., 1995. Spillovers and Innovative Activities, Presidential Address. Meetings of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics, September.
16. Finan, W.F., Link, A.N., 1994. Evaluation of the Value of the Semiconductor Research Corporation to Its Members. SRC Technical Report T94-177.
17. Henriques I. Cooperative and Noncooperative R and D in Duopoly with Spillovers: Comment. American Economic Review. 80:1990;638-640.
18. Jorde T.M., Teece D.J. Innovation and Cooperation: Implications for Competition and Antitrust. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 4:1990;75-96.
19. Kamien M., Muller E., Zang I. Research Joint Ventures and R and D Cartels. American Economic Review. 82:1992;1293-1306.
20. Katz M. An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development, Rand Journal of Economics. 17:1986;527-543.
21. Leyden, D.P., Link, A.N., 1992. Government's Role in Innovation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
22. Link, A.N., 1996a. Evaluating Public Sector Research and Development. Praeger Publishers, Westport, CO.
23. Link A.N. Research Joint Ventures: Patterns from Federal Register Filings. Review of Industrial Organization. 11:1996;617-628.
24. Link, A.N., Bauer, L.B., 1989. Cooperative Research in U.S. Manufacturing. D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.
25. Link A.N., Teece D.J., Finan W.F. Estimating the Benefits from Collaboration: The Case of SEMATECH. Review of Industrial Organization. 11:1996;737-751.
26. Mowery, D.C. (Ed.), 1988. International Collaborative Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing. Ballinger, Cambridge.
27. Mowery, D.C., 1989. Collaborative Research in High-Temperature Superconductivity. In: Link, A.N., Tassey, G. (Eds.), Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry-University-Government Relationship. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Mowery, D.C., Teece, D.J., 1996. Strategic Alliances and Industrial Research. In: Rosenbloom, R.S., Spencer, W.J. (Eds.), Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research and the End of an Era. Boston, Harvard University Press.
29. Ordover J., Willig R.D. Antitrust for High Technology Industries: Assessing Research Joint Ventures and Mergers. Journal of Law and Economics. 28:1985;311-333.
30. Pisano G.P. The R and D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:1990;153-176.
31. Roessner D.J., Wise A. Public Policy and Emerging Sources of Technology and Technical Information Available to Industry. Policy Studies Journal. 22:1994;349-358.
32. Scott J.T. Diversification versus Co-Operation in R and D Investments. Managerial and Decision Economics. 9:1988;173-186.
33. Scott, J.T., 1989. Historical and Economic Perspectives of the National Cooperative Research Act. In: Link, A.N., Tassey, G. (Eds.), Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry-University-Government Relationship. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Scott J.T. Environmental Research Joint Ventures Among Manufacturers. Review of Industrial Organization. 11:1996;655-679.
35. Shapiro C., Willig R.D. On the Antitrust Treatment of Production Joint Ventures. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 4:1990;113-130.
36. Simpson R.D., Vonortas N. Cournot Equilibrium with Imperfectly Appropriable R and D. Journal of Industrial Economics. 42:1994;79-92.
37. Stephan P. The Economics of Science. Journal of Economic Literature. 34:1996;1199-1262.
38. Suzumura K. Cooperative and Noncooperative R and D in an Oligopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review. 82:1992;1307-1320.
39. Tassey, G., 1992. Technology Infrastructure and Competitive Position. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
40. Tassey, G., 1995. Technology and Economic Growth: Implications for Federal Policy. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Planning Report 95-3.
41. Tripsas M., Schrader S., Sobrero M. Discouraging Opportunistic Behavior in Collaborative R and D: A New Role for Government. Research Policy. 24:1995;367-389.
42. U.S. Congress, House Science and Technology Committee, 1983. Japanese Technological Advances and Possible U.S. Responses Using Research Joint Ventures. Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Investigation and Oversight and the Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology. Washington, DC, June 29-30.
43. Vonortas N. Inter-firm Cooperation with Imperfectly Appropriable Research. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 12:1994;413-435.
44. Vonortas, N., 1998. Research Joint Ventures in the United States. Research Policy, forthcoming.
45. Yi S.-S. The Welfare Effects of Cooperative R and D in Oligopoly with Spillovers. Review of Industrial Organization. 11:1996;681-698.