Probabilistic discovery of overlapping cellular processes and their regulation

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, RECOMB

Volumn 8, Issue , 2004, Pages 167-176

  Battle, Alexis ^a   Segal, Eran ^a   Koller, Daphne ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellular Processes; Gene Regulation; Probabilistic Relational Models

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA REDUCTION; DNA; GENES; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY;

CELLULAR PROCESSES; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REGULATION; PROBABILISTIC RELATIONAL MODELS;

CELLS;

EID: 2442593870     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/974614.974637     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. O. Alter, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein. Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 (18), pp. 10101-10106, 2000.
2. M. et al. Ashburner. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics, 25:25-29, 2000.
3. A. Bjorck. Numerical methods for least squares problems. Siam, 1996.
4. L. Breiman, J.H. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone. Classification and Regression Trees. Wardsworth International Group, 1984.
5. Y. Cheng and G.M. Church. Biclustering of expression data. In ISMB'00, 2000.
6. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 39:1-39. 1977.
7. M. B. Eisen. P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. PNAS, 95(25):14863-8, 1998.
8. L. Frenz, A. Johnson, and L. Johnston. Rmel, which controls cln2 expression in saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a nuclear protein that is cell cycle regulated. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 266(3):374, 2001.
9. N. Friedman. The Bayesian structural EM algorithm. In Proc. UAI, 1998.
10. N. Friedman, I. Nachman, and D. Peer. Learning of Bayesian network structure from massive datasets: The "sparse candidate" algorithm. Submitted, 1999.
11. A. P. Gasch, M. Huang, S. Metzner, S. J. Elledge, D. Botstein, and P. O. Brown. Genomic expression responses to dna damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast atr homolog meclp. Molecular Biology Cell, 12, 2001.
12. A.P. Gasch, P.T. Spellman, C.M. Kao, O.Carmel-Harel, M.B. Eisen, G.Storz, D.Botstein, and P.O. Brown. Genomic expression program in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Bio. Cell, 11:4241-4257, 2000.
13. D. Geiger and D. Heckerman. Parameter priors for directed acyclic graphical models and the characterization of several probability distributions. Annals of Stastics, 30(5):1412-40, 2002.
14. T. R. Hughes, M. J. Marton, A. R. Jones, C. J. Roberts, R. Stoughton, C. D. Armour, H. A. Bennett, E. Coffey, H. Dai, Y. D. He, M. J. Kidd, A. M. King, M. R. Meyer, D. Slade, P. Y. Lum, S. B. Stepaniants, D. D. Shoemaker, D. Gachotte, K. Chakraburtty, J. Simon, M. Bard, and S. H. Friend. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell, 102(1):109-26, 2000.
15. J Ihmels, G Friedlander, S Bergmann, O Sarig, Y Ziv, and N Barkai. Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network. Nat Genet., 31:370-7, 2002.
16. D. Koller and A. Pfeffer. Probabilistic frame-based systems. In Proc. AAAI, 1998.
17. T. Kunoh, Y. Kaneko, and S. Harashima. Positive regulation of transcription of homeoprotein-encoding yhp1 by the two-component regulator sln1 in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 278(2):344-348, 2000.
18. T. Kunoh, Y. Kaneko, and S. Harashima. Yhp1 encodes a new homeoprotein that binds to the ime1 promoter in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 16(5):439-449, 2000.
19. L. Lazzeroni and A. Owen. Plaid models for gene expression data. Technical report. Stanford, 1999.
20. T.I. Lee and et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science, 298:824-7, 2002.
21. U. Lerner and R. Parr. Inference in hybrid networks: Theoretical limits and practical algorithms. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2001.
22. J. Mead, A. R. Bruning, M. K. Gill. A. M. Steinera, T. B. Acton, and A. K. Vershon. Interactions of the mcm1 mads box protein with cofactors that regulate mating in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol., 22:4607-4621, 2002.
23. J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
24. D. Pe'er, A. Regev, G. Elidan, and N. Friedman. Inferring subnetworks from perturbed expression profiles. In ISMB'01, 2001.
25. E. Segal, Y. Barash, I. Simon, N. Friedman, and D. Koller. From sequence to expression: A probabilistic framework. In Proc. RECOMB, 2002.
26. E. Segal, A. Battle, , and D. Koller. Decomposing gene expression into cellular components. In Proc. PSB, 2003.
27. E. Segal, D. Pe'er, A. Regev, D. Koller, and N. Friedman. Learning module networks. In Proc. UAI, 2003.
28. E. Segal, M. Shapira, A. Regev, D. Pe'er, D. Botstein, D. Koller, and N. Friedman. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nature Genetics, 2003.
29. E. Segal, B. Taskar, A. Gasch, N. Friedman, and D. Koller. Rich probabilistic models for gene expression. Bioinformatics, 17(Suppl 1):S243-52, 2001.
30. P. T. Spellman, G. Sherlock, M. Q. Zhang, V. R. Iyer, K. Anders, M. B. Eisen, P. O. Brown, D. Botstein, and B. Futcher. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell, 9(12):3273-97, 1998.
31. A. Tanay, R. Sharan, and R. Shamir. Discovering statistically significant biclusters in gene expression data. In Proc. ISMB, 2002. Bioinformatics 18, Supplement 1.
32. E. Wingender and et al.. The TRANSFAC system on gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Research, 29:281-283, 2001.