Genetics in Society/Society in Genetics

Science as Culture

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 421-428

  Hedgecoe, Adam ^a   Tutton, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442560625     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950543022000028910     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Appleyard, B., 1999. Brave New Worlds:Genetics and Human Experience, Harper-Collins.
2. Condit, C.M., 1995. 'Contributions of the rhetorical perspective to then social placement of medical genetics'. Communication Studies, 46:118–129.
3. Condit, C.M., 1999a. The Meaning of the Gene:Public Debates about Human Heredity, Madison:University of Wisconsin.
4. Condit, C.M., 1999b. 'How the public understands genetics:non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the "blueprint" metaphor'. Public Understanding of Science, 8:169–180.
5. Condit, C.M., Ofulue, N., and Sheedy, K., 1998. 'Determinism and mass media portrayals of genetics'. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62:979–984.
6. Conrad, P., and Gabe, J., 1999. 'Sociological perspectives on the new genetics'. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(5):505–516.
7. Conrad, P., and Weinberg, D., 1996. 'Has the gene for alcoholism been discovered three times since 1980? A news media analysis'. Perspectives on Social Problems, 8:3–24.
8. Cookson, C., and Griffith, V., 2001. 'An argument about human complexity'. Financial Times, 12 June:15
9. DeVries, R., and Conrad, P., 1998. “'Why bioethics needs sociology'”. In Bioethics and Society:Constructing the Ethical Enterprise, Edited by:DeVries, R., and Subedi, J., 233–257. New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
10. Finkler, K., 2000. Experiencing the New Genetics:Family and Kinship on the Medical Frontier, Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
11. Fitzgerald, J., 1998. 'Geneticizing disability:the Human Genome Project and the commodification of self. Issues in Law and Medicine, 14(2):147–163.
12. Franklin, S., 1988. 'Life Story:the gene as fetish object on TV. Science as Culture, 3:92–101.
13. Ho, M.W., 2001. 'The Human Genome Map, the death of genetic determinism and beyond'. ISIS Report, 14 February www.i-sis.org/
14. Hoedemaekers, R., and Ten Have, H., 1998. 'Geneticization:the Cyprus paradigm'. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 23(2):274–287.
15. Hubbard, R., and WaId, E., 1992. Exploding the Gene Myth, Boston:Beacon Press.
16. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2001. 'Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome'. Nature, 409(6822) 15 February:860–921.
17. Kerr, A., 2000. '(Re)constructing genetic disease:the clinical continuum between cystic fibrosis and male infertility'. Social Studies of Science, 30(6):847–894.
18. Lippman, A., 1992. 'Led (astray) by genetic maps:the cartography of the human genome and health care'. Social Science Medicine, 35(12):1469–1476.
19. Lippman, A., 1998. “'The politics of health:geneticization versus health promotion'”. In The Politics of Women's Health:Exploring Agency and Autonomy, Edited by:Sherwin, Sue. 64–82. Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
20. Marteau, T., and Richards, M., 1996. The Troubled Helix:Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
21. Medical Research Council (MRC). April 2001. Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research, April, London:MRC.
22. Midgley, M., 1979. 'Gene juggling'. Philosophy, 54:439–458.
23. Midgley, M., 1983. 'Selfish genes and social Darwinism'. Philosophy, 58:365–377.
24. Nelkin, D., and Lindee, S., 1995. The DNA Mystique:The Gene as a Cultural Icon, New York:Freeman.
25. Opitz, J.M., 2000. “'Afterword:the geneticization of Western civilization:blessing or bane?'”. In Controlling Our Destinies:Historical, Philosophical, Ethical, and Theological Perspectives on the Human Genome Project, Edited by:Sloan, Phillip R., 429–450. Notre Dame, IN:University of Notre Dame Press.
26. Rapp, R., 1990. “'Constructing amniocentesis:medical and maternal voices'”. In Uncertain Terms:Negotiating Gender in America, Edited by:Ginsburg, F., and Tsing, A.L., 28–42. Boston:Beacon.
27. Rapp, R., 1993. 'Sociocultural differences in the impact of amniocentesis--an anthropological research report'. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 8(Supp. 1):90–96.
28. Rapp, R., 1998. 'Refusing prenatal diagnosis:the meanings of bioscience in a multicultural world'. Science, Technology and Human Values, 23(1):45–70.
29. Rapp, R., 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus:The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America, New York and London:Routledge.
30. Rock, M., 1997. 'Genetic norms, eugenic logic and UNESCO's International Bioethics Committee'. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 7(4):108–110.
31. Rose, S., Lewontin, R.C., and Kamin, L., 1984. Not in Our Genes:Biology, Ideology and Human Nature, London:Penguin.
32. Sherwin, S., and Simpson, C., 1999. “'Ethical questions in the pursuit of genetic information:geneticization and BRCAl'”. In Genetic Information:Acquisition, Access and Control, Edited by:Thompson, Alison, and Chadwick, Ruth. 121–128. New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishing.
33. Stockdale, A., 1999. 'Waiting for the cure:mapping the social relations of human gene therapy research'. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(5):579–596.
34. Strohman, R., 2001. 'Human Genome Project in crisis:where is the programme for life?'. The California Monthly, 111(5) http://209.232.194.53/Alumni/ Cal_Monthly/April_2001/main.asp