The effects of accountability on bias in physician decision making: Going from bad to worse

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 173-178

  Schwartz, Janet ^a,c   Chapman, Gretchen ^a   Brewer, Noel ^a   Bergus, George ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442506755     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206479     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. GOLDSTEIN, W. M., & EINHORN, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 94, 236-254.
2. HUBER, J., PAYNE, J. W., & PUTO, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90-98.
3. LERNER, J. S., & TETLOCK, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
4. REDELMEIER, D. A., & SHAFIR, E. (1995). Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 302-305.
5. SCHWARTZ, J. A., & CHAPMAN, G. B. (1999). Are more options always better? The attraction effect in physicians' decisions about medications. Medical Decision Making, 19, 315-323.
6. SHAFIR, E., SIMONSON, I., & TVERSKY, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
7. SIMONSON, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174.
8. SIMONSON, I., & NYE, P. (1992). The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 51, 416-446.
9. SLOVIC, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364-371.
10. TVERSKY, A., & SHAFIR, E. (1992) Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3, 358-361.