Optimizing purebred selection for crossbred performance using QTL with different degrees of dominance

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 297-324

  Dekkers, Jack C M ^a   Chakraborty, Reena ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crossbreeding; Marker assisted selection; Quantitative trait loci; Selection

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

SELECTIVE BREEDING;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; DOMINANT GENE; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; INBREEDING; MALE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENES, DOMINANT; GENETICS, POPULATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INBREEDING; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA;

EID: 2442435895     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2004003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bijma P., van Arendonk J. A.M., Maximizing genetic gain for the sire line of a crossbreeding scheme utilizing both purebred and crossbred information, Anim. Sci. 66 (1998) 529-542.
2. Bulmer M.G., The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980.
3. Chakraborty R., Moreau L., Dekkers J.C.M., A method to optimize selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci, Genet. Sel. Evol. 34 (2002) 145-170.
4. Dekkers J.C.M., Breeding values for identified quantitative trait loci under selection, Genet. Sel. Evol. 31 (1999) 421-436.
5. Dekkers J.C.M., van Arendonk J.A.M., Optimizing selection for quantitative traits with information on an identified locus in outbred populations, Genet. Res. 71 (1998) 257-275.
6. Dekkers J.C.M., Chakraborty R., Potential gain from optimizing multi-generation selection on an identified quantitative trait locus, J. Anim. Sci. 79 (2001) 2975-2990.
7. Dekkers J.C.M., Chakraborty R., Moreau L., Optimal selection on two quantitative trait loci with linkage, Genet. Sel. Evol. 34 (2001) 171-192.
8. De Koning D.J., Rattink A.P., Harlizius B., Groenen M.A.M., Brascamp E.W., van Arendonk J.A.M., Detection and characterization of quantitative trait loci for growth and reproduction traits in pigs, Livest. Prod. Sci. 72 (2001) 185-198.
9. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C., Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Longman, Harlow, UK, 1996.
10. Gibson J.P., Short-term gain at the expense of long-term response with selection of identified loci, in: Proc. 5th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., University of Guelph, Guelph, 21 (1994) pp. 201-204.
11. Kinghorn B.P., Meszaros S.A., Vagg R.D., Dynamical tactical decision systems for animal breeding, in: Proc. 7th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France, 2002, Communication No. 23-07.
12. Larzul C., Manfredi E., Elsen J.M., Potential gain from including major gene information in breeding value estimation, Genet. Sel. Evol. 29 (1997) 161-184.
13. Li Y., van der Werf J.H.J., Kinghorn B.P., Mate selection in parental lines to exploit known dominant QTL in crosses, in: Proc. 7th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France, 2002, Communication No. 23-09.
14. Lynch M., Walsh B., Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA, 1998.
15. Malek M., Dekkers J.C.M., Lee H.K., Baas T.J., Rothschild M.F., A molecular genome scan analysis to identify chromosomal regions influencing economic traits in the pig. I. Growth and body composition, Mamm. Genome 12 (2001) 637-645.
16. Manfredi E., Barbieri M., Fournet F., Elsen J.M., A dynamic deterministic model to evaluate breeding strategies under mixed inheritance, Genet. Sel. Evol. 30 (1998) 127-148.
17. Merks J.W.M., de Vries A.W., New sources of information in pig breeding, in: Proc. 7th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France, 2002, Communication No. 03-01.
18. Merks J.W.M., Hanenberg E.H.A.T., Optimal selection strategy for crossbred performance in commercial pig breeding programmes, in: Proc. 6th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Armidale, Australia, 23 (1998) pp. 575-579.
19. Pong-Wong R., Woolliams J.A., Response to mass selection when an identified major gene is segregating, Genet. Sel. Evol. 30 (1998) 313-337.
20. Uimari P., Gibson J.P., Combined crossbred and purebred selection vs. pureline selection for a sex limited trait in poultry, in: Proc. 6th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Armidale, Australia, 25 (1998) pp. 455-458.
21. Wei M., van der Steen H.A.M., Comparison of reciprocal recurrent selection with pure-line selection systems in animal breeding (a review), Anim. Breed. Abstr. 59 (1991) 281-298.
22. Wei M., van der Werf J.H.J., Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information, Anim. Prod. 59 (1994) 401-413.