A dynamic deterministic model to evaluate breeding strategies under mixed inheritance;Un modele deterministe et dynamique pour comparer des strategies de selection en heredite mixte

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 127-148

  Manfredi, Eduardo ^a   Barbieri, Maria ^a   Fournet, Florence ^a   Elsen, Jean Michel ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Dynamic selection; Genetic marker; Major gene; Model

Indexed keywords

CAPTIVE BREEDING; CONSERVATION; GENETICS; MODELLING;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOTYPE; MALE; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

EID: 0031779809     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19980203     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barbieri M.E., Polymorphisme de la caséine αs1. Effets des génotypes sur des performances zootechniques et utilisation en sélection caprine, Ph.D. thesis, Institut national agronomique, Paris-Grignon, 1995.
2. de Koning G.J., Weller J.I., Efficiency of direct selection on quantitative trait loci for a two-trait breeding objective, Theor. Appl. Genet. 88 (1994) 669-677.
3. Elsen J.M., Mocquot J.C., Recherches pour une rationalisation technique des schémas de sélection des bovins et des ovins, Bull. Tech. Département. Génét. Anim., Inra. Paris, 1974.
4. Elsen J.M., Prediction of annual genetic gain and improvement lag between populations, Genet. Sel Evol. 25 (1993) 75-82.
5. Gibson J.P., Short term gain at the expense of long-term response with selection of identified loci, Proceedings of the 5th World Congress Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., 7-12 August, Guelph, vol. 21, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 1994, pp. 201-204.
6. Gomez-Raya L., Gibson J.P., Within-family selection at an otherwise unselected locus in dairy cattle, Genome 36 (1993) 433-439.
7. Hill W.G., Prediction and evaluation of response to selection with overlapping generations, Anim. Prod. 18 (1974) 117-140.
8. Kashi Y., Hallerman E., Soller M., Marker-assisted selection of candidate bulls for progeny testing programmes, Anim. Prod. 51 (1990) 63-74.
9. Larzul C., Manfredi E., Elsen J.M., Potential gain from including major gene information in breeding value estimation, Genet. Sel. Evol. 29 (1997) 161-184.
10. Manfredi E., Ricordeau G., Mahé M.F., Leroux C., Elsen J.M., Martin P., Grosclaude F., Importance of the αs1-casein polymorphism in dairy goat genetics, 46th EAAP Meeting, session IV, 48, 4-7 September, Prague, Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, 1995.
11. Meuwissen T.H.E., Van Arendonk J.A.M., Potential improvements in rate of genetic gain from marker-assisted-selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes, J. Dairy. Sci. 75 (1992) 1651-1659.
12. Meuwissen T.H.E., Goddard M.E., The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes, Genet. Sel. Evol. 28 (1996) 161-176.
13. Ruane J., Colleau J.J., Marker-assisted selection for a sex-limited character in a nucleus breeding population, J. Dairy Sci. 79 (1996) 1666-1678.
14. Verrier E., Colleau J.J., Foulley J.L., Marker assisted selection for increasing the sum of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance, 46th EAAP Meeting, session III, 37, 4-7 September, Prague, 1995.
15. Woolliams J.A., Pong-Wong R., Short versus long-term responses in breeding schemes, 46th EAAP Meeting, session III, 35, 4-7 September, Prague, 1995.