Conceptualization in the pigeon: What do we know?

International Journal of Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 73-94

  Khallad, Yacoub ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442419063     PISSN: 00207594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207590344000349     Document Type: Review

References (130)

1. Astley, S. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1992). Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons: All negative stimuli are not created equal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 193-207.
2. Astley, S. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1996). Mediating associations, essentialism, and non-similarity based categorization. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 111-133). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
3. Astley, S. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1998). Novelty and functional equivalence in superordinate categorization by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behaviour, 26, 25-138.
4. Astley, S. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1999). Super-ordinate category formation in pigeons: Association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 415-432.
5. Balsam, P. D. (1988). Selection, representation, and equivalence of controlling stimuli. In R. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R.D. Luce (Eds.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 111-166). New York: Wiley.
6. Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
7. Bhatt, R. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (1989). Secondary generalization and categorization in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 213-224.
8. Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F., & Knauss, K. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 219-234.
9. Blough, D. S. (1989). Odd-item search in pigeons: Display size and transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 14-22.
10. Carr, D., Wilkinson, K. M., & Blackman, D. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101-114.
11. Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognition, 9, 65-68.
12. Cerella, J. (1979). Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 68-77.
13. Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeon's analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognition, 12, 1-6.
14. Cerella, J. (1982). Mechanisms of concept formation in the pigeon. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Gooodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 241-260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Cook, R. G. (2001a). Birds, brains, and bits. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved June 25, 2003 from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/cook/
16. Cook, R. G. (2001b). Hierarchical stimulus processing in pigeons. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved June 25, 2003 from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/cook/
17. Cook, R. G. (2002). The structure of pigeon multiple-class same-different learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 345-364.
18. Cook, R. G., Katz, J. S., & Cavoto, B. R. (1997). Same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 417-433.
19. Curio, E. (1976). The ethology of predation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. D'Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P., Loukas, E., & Tomie, A. (1985). Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons. (Columba livia). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 35-47.
21. Delius, J. D. (1992a). Comparative cognition of identity. In P. Bartelson, P. Eelen, & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), International perspectives on psychological science: Vol. 1. Leading themes (pp. 25-40). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
22. Delius, J. D. (1992b). Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 20, 301-311.
23. Delius, J. D., Emmerton, J., Horster, W., Jager, R., & Ostheim, J. (1999). Picture-object recognition in pigeons. Current Psychology of Cognition, 18, 621-656.
24. Delius, J. D., & Habers, G. (1978). Symmetry: Can pigeons conceptualize it? Behavioral Biology, 22, 336-342.
25. Delius, J. D., Jitsumori, M., & Siemann, M. (2000). Stimulus equivalence through discrimination reversals. In C. Heyes & L. Huber (Eds.), Evolution of cognition (pp. 103-122). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Delius, J. D., & Nowak, B. (1982). Visual symmetry recognition by pigeons. Psychological Research, 44, 199-212.
27. Delius, J. D., Siemann, M., Emmerton, J., & Xia, L. (2001). Cognitions of birds as products of evolved brains. In G. Roth & M. F. Wulliman (Eds.), Brain evolution and cognition (pp. 451-490). New York: Wiley.
28. Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
29. Dittrich, W. H., & Lea, S. E. G. (1993). Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 115-129.
30. Dittrich, W. H., Lea, S. E. G., Barrett, J., & Gurr, P. R. (1998). Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: Visual concept discrimination and biological motion. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 281-299.
31. Dube, W. V., McDonald, S. J., & McIlvane, W. J. (1991). A note on the relationship between equivalence classes and functional stimulus classes. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 7-11.
32. Dube, W. V., McIlvane, W. J., Callahan, T. D., & Stoddard, L. T. (1993). The search for stimulus equivalence in nonverbal organisms. The Psychological Record, 43, 761-778.
33. Dugdale, N., & Lowe, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 115-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
34. Edwards, C. A., & Honig, W. K. (1987). Memorization and "feature selection" in the acquisition of natural concepts in pigeons. Learning and Motivation, 18, 235-260.
35. Emmerton, J. (1998). Numerosity differences and effects of stimulus density on pigeons' discrimination performance. Animal Learning and Behavior, 26, 243-256.
36. Emmerton, J. (2001). Birds' judgments of number and quantity. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved June 26, 2003 from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/emmerton/
37. Emmerton, J., & Delius, J. D. (1993). Beyond sensation: Visual cognition in pigeons. In H. P. Zeigler & H. J. Bischof (Eds.), Vision, brain, and behavior (pp. 377-390). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Emmerton, J., Lohmann, A., & Niemann, J. (1997). Pigeon's serial ordering of numerosity with visual arrays. Animal Learning and Behavior, 25, 234-244.
39. Galvao, O., Calcagno, S., & Sidman, M. (1992). Testing for emergent performances in extinction. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 10, 18-20.
40. Greene, S. L. (1983). Feature memorization in pigeon concept formation. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behaviour: Discrimination processes, Vol. 4 (pp. 209-229). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
41. Hayes, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385-392.
42. Herbranson, W. T., Fremouw, T., & Shimp, C. P. (2002). Categorizing a moving target in terms of its speed, direction, or both. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 249-270.
43. Herrnstein, R. J. (1979). Acquisition, generalization, and discrimination reversal of a natural concept. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes, 5, 16-129.
44. Herrnstein, R. J. (1984). Objects, categories, and discriminative stimuli. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 233-261). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
45. Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Riddles of natural categorization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 308, 129-144.
46. Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach. Cognition, 37, 133-166.
47. Herrnstein, R. J., & de Villiers, P. A. (1980). Fish as a natural concept for people and pigeons. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 14 (pp. 59-95). New York: Academic Press.
48. Herrnstein, R. J., & Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concepts in the pigeon. Science, 146, 549-551.
49. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., & Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285-302.
50. Herrnstein, R. J., Vaughan, W., Mumford, D. B., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Teaching pigeons an abstract relational rule: Insideness. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 56-64.
51. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
52. Huber, L. (1995). On the biology of perceptual categorization. Evolution and Cognition, 1, 121-138.
53. Huber, L. (1999). Generic perception: Open-ended categorization of natural classes. Current Psychology of Cognition, 18, 845-887.
54. Huber, L. (2001). Visual categorization in pigeons. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved June 28, 2003 from wwwv.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/ Huber/
55. Huber, L., Aust, U., Michelbach, G., Olzant, S., Loidolt, M., & Nowotny, R. (1999). Limits on symmetry conceptualization in pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 351-379.
56. Huber, L., & Lenz, R. (1993). A test of the linear feature model of polymorphous concept discrimination with pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 1-18.
57. Huber, L., & Lenz, R. (1996). Categorization of prototypical stimulus classes by pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 111-133.
58. Husband, S., & Shimizu, T. (2001). Evolution of the avian visual system. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved June 25, 2003 from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/husband/
59. Jitsumori, M. (1996). A prototype effect and categorization of artificial polymorphous stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 405-419.
60. Jitsumori, M., Siemann, M., Lehr, M., & Delius, J. D. (2002). A new approach to the formation of equivalence classes in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 397-408.
61. Kastak, C. R., Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131-158.
62. Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
63. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1996). Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 465-475.
64. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1998). Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 34-46.
65. Kuno, H., Kitadate, T., & Iwamoto, T. (1994). Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 399-408.
66. Lazar, R. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381-392.
67. Lea, S. E. G. (1984). In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In H. L. Roitblat & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 263-276). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
68. Lea, S. E. G., & Dittrich, W. H. (1999). What do birds see in moving video images? Current Psychology of Cognition, 18, 765-803.
69. Lea, S. E. G., Lohmann, A., & Ryan, C. M. E. (1993). Discriminations of five-dimensional stimuli by pigeons: Limitations of feature analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 19-42.
70. Lea, S. E. G., & Ryan, C. M. E. (1983). Feature analysis of pigeons' acquisition of discrimination between letters. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behaviour: Vol. 4. Discrimination processes, (pp. 239-253). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
71. Lea, S. E. G., & Ryan, C. M. E. (1990). Unnatural concepts and the theory of concept discrimination in birds. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. Chosen, & D. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 8. Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation (pp. 165-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
72. Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2000). Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample locations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 141-161.
73. Lipkens, R., Kop, P. F. M., & Matthjis, W. (1988). A test for symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395-409.
74. Lombardi, C. M., Fachinelli, C. C., & Delius, J. D. (1984). Oddity of visual patterns conceptualized by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 12, 2-6.
75. Lubow, R. E. (1974). Higher-order concept formation in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 475-483.
76. Macphail, E. M., & Reilly, S. (1989). Rapid acquisition of novelty versus familiarity concept by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 242-252.
77. Mazur, J. E. (1990). Learning and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, Vol. 21. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
78. Mazur, J. E. (1990). Learning and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, Vol. 21. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
79. Morgan, M. J., Fitch, M., Holman, J., & Lea, S. E. G. (1976). Pigeons learn the concept of an "A." Perception, 5, 57-66.
80. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
81. Porter, D., & Nueringer, A. (1984). Music discriminations by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 138-148.
82. Rosch, E. (1975). Universals and cultural specifics in human categorization. In R.W. Brislin, S. Bochner, & W. J. Lonner (Eds.), Cross-cultural perspectives on learning. New York: Sage.
83. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp.27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
84. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
85. Ryan, C. M. E., & Lea, S. E. G. (1994). Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds. Behavioural Processes, 33, 155-176.
86. Santiago, H. C., & Wright, A. A. (1984). Pigeon memory: Same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 498-512.
87. Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
88. Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1998). Functional equivalence in a California sea lion: Relevance to animal social and communicative interactions. Animal Behavior, 55, 1087-1095.
89. Schusterman, R. J., Kastak, D., & Reichmuth, C. J. (1997). What's in a name? Equivalence by any other name would smell as sweet. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 252-258.
90. Sidman, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93-114). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
91. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
92. Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 127-146.
93. Sidman, M., Cresson, O. Jr, & Wilson-Morris, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 261-273.
94. Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
95. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
96. Sidman, M., Wynne, C. K., Maguire, R. W., & Barnes, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261-274.
97. Siegel, R. K., & Honig, W. K. (1970). Pigeon concept formation: Successive and simultaneous acquisition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 385-390.
98. Skinner, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. Journal of General Psychology, 12, 40-65.
99. Sutton, J. E., & Roberts, W. A. (2002). Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 333-343.
100. Terrace, H. S. (1984). Animal cognition. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 7-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
101. Thompson, R. K. R. (1995). Natural and relational concepts in animals. In H. L. Roitblat & J. A. Meyer (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognitive science (pp. 175-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
102. Tonneau, F. (2001). Equivalence relations: A critical analysis. European Journal of Behaviour Analysis, 2, 1-33.
103. Troje, N. F., Huber, L., Loidolt, M., Aust, U., & Fieder, M. (1999). Categorical learning in pigeons: The role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli. Vision Research, 39, 353-366.
104. Urcuioli, P. J. (1996). Acquired equivalence and mediated generalization in pigeon's matching to sample. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 55-70). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
105. Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., & DeMarse, T. (1995). Transfer to derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 158-178.
106. Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., Jackson-Smith, P., & Steirn, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: Retention, inter-trial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264-273.
107. Vaughan, W. Jr (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36-42.
108. Vaughan, W. Jr, & Greene, S. L. (1983). Acquisition of absolute discriminations in pigeons. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 4. Discrimination processes (pp. 231-238). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
109. Vaughan, W. Jr, & Greene, S. L. (1984). Pigeon visual memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 256-271.
110. Von Fersen, L., & Delius, J. D. (1989). Long-term retention of many visual patterns by pigeons. Ethology, 82, 141-155.
111. Von Fersen, L., & Lea, S. E. G. (1990). Categorization by pigeons using five polymorphous features. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 69-84.
112. Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Comparative cognition: Beginning the second century of studying animal intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 211-228.
113. Wasserman, E. A., & DeVolder, C. L. (1993). Similarity- and nonsimilarity-based conceptualization in children and pigeons. The Psychological Record, 43, 779-793.
114. Wasserman, E. A., DeVolder, C. L., & Coppage, D. J. (1992). Nonsimilarity-based conceptualization by pigeons via secondary or mediated generalization. Psychological Science, 3, 374-379.
115. Wasserman, E. A., Hugart, J. A., & Kirkpatrick-Steger, K. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 248-252.
116. Wasserman, E. A., Kiedinger, R. E., & Bhatt, R. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 235-246.
117. Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Seger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341.
118. Wasserman, E. A., Young, M. E., & Nolan, B. C. (2000). Display variability and spatial organization as contributors to the pigeon's discrimination of complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 133-143.
119. Wasserman, E. A., Young, M. E., & Peissig, J. J. (2002). Brief presentations are sufficient for pigeons to discriminate displays of same and different stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 347-357.
120. Watanabe, S., & Ito, Y. (1991). Discrimination of individuals in pigeons. Bird Behavior, 9, 20-29.
121. Watanabe, S., Lea, S. E. G., & Dittrich, W. H. (1993). What can we learn from experiments on pigeon concept discrimination? In H. P. Zeigler & H. J. Bischof (Eds.), Vision, brain, and behavior in birds (pp. 351-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
122. Watanabe, S., Sakamoto, J., & Wakita, M. (1995). Pigeon's discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 165-174.
123. Wright, A. A., Cook, R. G., Rivera, J. J., Sands, S. F., & Delius, J. D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior, 23, 207-217.
124. Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (1997). Entropy detection by pigeons: Response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 157-170.
125. Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (2001). Stimulus control in complex arrays. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved June 27, 2003 from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/young/
126. Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Garner, K. L. (1997). Effects of number of items on the pigeon's discrimination of same from different visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 491-501.
127. Zentall, T. R., Galizio, M., & Critchfield, T. M. (2002). Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: An introduction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 237-248.
128. Zentall, T. R., Steirn, J. N., Sherburn, L. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (1991). Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional and simple discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 194-201.
129. Xia, L., Emmerton, J., Siemann, M., & Delius, J. D. (2001). Pigeons learn to link numerosities with symbols. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 83-91.
130. Xia, L., Siemann, M., & Delius, J. D. (2000). Matching of numerical symbols with number of responses by pigeons. Animal Cognition, 3, 35-43.