Using response-time constraints to control for differential speededness in computerized adaptive testing

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 195-210

  Van Der Linden, Wim J ^a   Scrams, David J ^b   Schnipke, Deborah L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033245649     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/01466219922031329     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
2. Hetter, R. D., & Sympson, J. B. (1997). Item exposure control in CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 141-144). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Lord, F.M. ( 1975). The ability scale in item characteristic curve theory. Psychometrika, 40, 205-217.
4. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Luce, D. R. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Roskam, E. E. (1997). Models for speed and time-limit tests. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 187-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R. (Eds.) (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Schnipke, D. L., & Scrams, D. J. (1997). Representing response-time information in item banks (LSAC Computerized Testing Report No. 97-09). Newtown PA: Law School Admission Council.
10. Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L. (in press). A lognormal response time model. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
11. Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., Bloxom, B. M., & Hetter, R. D. (1997). Psychometric procedures for administering CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 131-140). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Segall, D. O., Moreno, K. E., & Better, D. H. (1997). Item pool development and evaluation. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 117-130). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C. (1998). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 57-76.
14. Swanson, D. B., Featherman, C., Case, S. M., Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J. (1997, April). Relation of response latency to test design, examinee proficiency, and item difficulty in computer-based test administration. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago IL.
15. Sympson, J. M., & Hetter, R. D. (1985, October). Controlling exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the 27th annual conference of the Military Testing Association, San Diego CA.
16. Thissen, D. (1983). Timed testing: An approach using item response testing. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 179-203). New York: Academic Press.
17. Thomasson, G. L. (1995, June). New item exposure control algorithms for computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Minneapolis MN.
18. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, G. F. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. van der Linden, W. J. (1998a). Optimal assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195-211.
20. van der Linden, W. J. (1998b). Bayesian item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 63, 201-216.
21. van der Linden, W. J., & Reese, L. M. (1998). An optimal model for constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-270.
22. Verhelst, N. D., Verstralen, H. H. F. M., & Jansen, M. G. H. (1997). A logistic model for time-limit tests. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 169-186). New York: Springer.