Regression, self-disclosure, and the teach or treat dilemma: Implications of a relational approach for social work supervision

Clinical Social Work Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 431-449

  Ganzer, Carol ^a   Ornstein, Eric D ^b  

^a University of Illinois at Chicago ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Regression; Relational supervision; Self disclosure; Teach or treat dilemma

Indexed keywords

EID: 24344474478     PISSN: 00911674     EISSN: 15733343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10615-004-0541-4     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allphin, C. (1987). Perplexing or distressing episodes in supervision: How they can help in the teaching and learning of psychotherapy. Clinical Social Work Journal, 15, 236-245.
2. Berman, E. (1997). Psychoanalytic supervision as the crossroads of a relational matrix. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee (pp. 161-186). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
3. Borden, W. (2000). The relational paradigm in contemporary psychoanalysis: Toward a psychodynamically informed social work perspective. Social Service Review, 74, 352-379.
4. Bromberg, P. M. (1998), Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma & dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
5. Caligor, L., Bromberg, P. M., & Meltzer, J. D. (1984). Clinical perspective on the supervision of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Plenum Press.
6. Casement, P. J. (1997). Towards autonomy: Some thoughts on psychoanalytic supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee (pp. 263-282). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
7. Coltart, N. (1997). And now for something completely different: Postgraduate supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee (pp. 135-155). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
8. Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. (1958). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York: International University Press.
9. Epstein, L. (1997). Collusive selective inattention to the negative impact of the supervisory interaction. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 285-311). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
10. Fosshage, J. L. (1997). Toward a model of psychoanalytic supervision from a self-psychological/intersubjective perspective. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 189-210). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
11. Prawley-O'Dea, M. G. (1997). Supervision amidst abuse: The supervisee's perspective. In M, H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 315-335). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
12. Prawley-O'Dea, M. G., & Sarnat, J. E. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach. New York: Guilford Press.
13. Gabbard. G., & Lester, E. (1996). Boundaries and boundary violations in psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
14. Ganzer, C., & Ornstein, E. D. (1999). Beyond parallel process: Relational perspectives on field instruction. Clinical Social Work Journal, 27, 231-246.
15. Ganzer, C., & Ornstein, E. D. (2002). A sea of trouble: A relational approach to the culturally sensitive treatment of a severely disturbed client. Clinical Social Work Journal, 20, 127-144,
16. Gutheil, T., & Gabbard, G. (1993). The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: Theoretical and risk management dimensions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 188-196.
17. Hirsch, I. (1997). Supervision amidst abuse: The supervisor's perspective. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 339-357). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
18. Huffman, I. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process: A dialectical-constructivist view. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
19. Kahn, E. (1979). The parallel process in social work treatment and supervision. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 60, 520-528.
20. Lane, R. C. (1990). Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
21. Large, D. (1963). Four processes of field instruction in casework: The field instructor's contribution to instructor-student interaction in second-year field work. Social Service Review, 37, 263-273.
22. Maroda, K, (2002, September 21). Legitimate gratification in the analytic setting. Presentation to a meeting of the Chicago Association for Psychoanalytic Psychology, Chicago, IL.
23. Marshall, R. J. (1997). The interactional triad in supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed,), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 77-101). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
24. Misha, F., & Rasmussen, B. (2001). The learning relationship: Working through disjunction in the classroom. Clinical Social Work Journal, 29, 317-406,
25. Nichols, M, & Schwartz, R. (with Sluzki, C.). (1991). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
26. Ornstein, E. D., & Ganzer, C. (1997) Mitchell's relational conflict model: An analysis of its usefulness in clinical social work. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 391-405.
27. Ornstein, E. D., & Ganzer, C. (2000). Strengthening the strengths perspective: An integrative relational approach. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 7, 57-78.
28. Ringel, S. (2001). In the shadow of death: Relational paradigms in clinical supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 29, 171-180.
29. Rock, M. H. (Ed.). (1997). Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
30. Rosbrow, T. (1997). From parallel process to developmental process: A developmental/plan formulation approach to supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 213-236). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
31. Searles, H. F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experience. Psychiatry, 15. 135-146.
32. Searles, H. F. (1965). Problems of psycho-analytic supervision. In Collected papers on schizophrenia and related subjects (pp. 584-604), New York: International Universities Press.
33. (First published in J. H. Wasserman (Ed.), Science and psychoanalysis, Vol. 5. 1962, New York: Grune & Stratton)
34. Shonfeld-Ringel, S. (2001). A re-conceptualization of the working alliance in cross-cultural practice with non-Western clients: Integrating relational perspectives and multicultural theories. Clinical Social Work Journal, 29, 53-64.
35. Williams, A. B. (1997). On parallel process in social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 425-435.
36. Wolstein, B. (1997). A proposal to enlarge the individual model of psychoanalytic supervision In M. H, Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 239-257). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.