Convergence in the leaf shape of vines: A test of the Carolina flora using phylogenetic comparative methods

Southeastern Naturalist

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 277-288

  Goodwillie, Carol ^a   May, Melynda K ^a   West, Jennifer W ^a   McKeon, Christian S ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 24344469730     PISSN: 15287092     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1656/1528-7092(2004)003[0277:CITLSO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arbuthnott, J. 1710. An argument for divine providence taken from the constant regularity in the births of both sexes. Philosophical Transactions 27:724-735.
2. Backlund, M., B. Oxelman, and B. Bremer. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on ndhF and rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae. American Journal Botany 87:1029-1043.
3. Caddick, L.R., P. Wilkin, P.J. Rudall, T.A.J. Hedderson, and M.W. Chase. 2002. Yams reclassified: A recircumscription of Dioscoreaceae and Dioscoreales. Taxon 51:103-114.
4. Chase, M.W., D.W. Stevenson, P. Wilkin, and P.J. Rudall. 1995. Monocot systematics: A combined analysis. Pp. 685-730, In P.J. Rudall, P.J. Cribb, D.F. Cutler, and C.J. Humphries (Eds.). Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, UK. 750 pp.
5. Civeyrel, L., A. Le Thomas, K. Ferguson, and M.W. Chase. 1998. Critical reexamination of palynological characters used to delimit Asclepiadaceae in comparison to the molecular phylogeny obtained from plastid matK sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9:517-527.
6. Crawley, M.J., P.H. Harvey, and A. Purvis. 1997. Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles. Pp. 36-53, In J. Silvertown, M. Franco, and J.L. Harper (Eds.). Plant Life Histories: Ecology, Phylogeny and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 313 pp.
7. DahlgreN, R., and K. Bremer. 1985. Major clades of the angiosperms. Cladistics 1:349-368.
8. Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., C E.R. De Sant'ana, and L.M. Bini. 1998. An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52:1247-1262.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
10. Fishbein, M.C., C. Hibsch-Jetter, D.E. Soltis, and L. Hufford. 2001. Phylogeny of Saxifragales (Angiosperms: Eudicots): Analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. Systematic Biology 50:817-847.
11. Givnish, T.J. 1986. Economics of support. Pp 413-420, In T.J. Givnish (Ed.). On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. 717pp.
12. Givnish, T.J. 1987. Comparative studies of leaf form: Assessing the relative roles of selective pressures and phylogenetic constraints. New Phytologist 106 (Suppl.):131-160.
13. Givnish, T.J., and G.J. Vermeij. 1976. Sizes and shapes of liane leaves. American Naturalist 100:743-778.
14. Loconte H., and J.R. Estes. 1989. Phylogenetic systematics of Berberidaceae and Ranunculales (Magnoliidae). Systematic Botany 14:565-579.
15. Martins, E.P., and T.F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: A general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. American Naturalist 149:646-667.
16. Martins, E.P., and T.F. Hansen. 2000. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:296-299.
17. Miller, A.J., D.A. Young, and J. Wen. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) based on ITS sequence data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162:1401-1407.
18. Olmstead, R.G., B.Bremer, K.M. Scott, and J.D. Palmer. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on the rbcL sequence. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80:700-722.
19. Parkhurst, D.F., and O.L. Loucks. 1972. Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. Journal of Ecology 60:505-537.
20. Qiu, Y.-L., J. Lee, F. Bernasconi-Quadroni, D.E. Soltis, P.S. Soltis, M. Zanis, E. A. Zimmer, Z. Chen, V. Savolainen, and M W. Chase. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: Analysis of five genes from three genomes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161(Suppl.):S3-S27.
21. Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
22. Richards, P.W. 1964. The Tropical Rainforest. Cambridge University Press, London, UK. 450 pp.
23. Richardson, J.E., M.F. Fay, Q.C.B. Cronk, D. Bowman, and M.W. Chase. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 87:1309-1324.
24. Ro, K.E., C.S. Keener, and B.A. McPheron. 1997. Molecular phylogenetic study of the Ranunculaceae: Utility of the nuclear 26S ribosomal DNA in inferring intrafamilial relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8:117-127.
25. Rodman, J.E. 1984. A taxonomic analysis and revised classification of Centrospermae. Systematic Botany 9:297-323.
26. Rodman, J.E. 1991. A taxonomic analysis of glucosinolate-producing plants. Part 2: Cladistics. Systematic Botany 16:619-629.
27. Schmidt, G.J., and E.E. Schilling. 2000. Phylogeny and biogeography of Eupatorium (Asteraceae: Eupatorieae) based on nuclear ITS sequence data. American Journal of Botany 87:716-726.
28. Sennblad, B., M.E. Endress, and B. Bremer. 1998. Morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic fraternity: The tribe Wrightieae (Apocynaceae) revisited. American Journal of Botany 85:1143-1158.
29. Simmons, M.P., V. Savolainen, C.C. Clevinger, R.H. Archer, and J.I. Davis. 2001. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from the phytochrome B, rbcL, atpB, 26S nuclear ribosomal DNA and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19:353-366.
30. Song, B.H., X.Q. Wang, F.Z. Li, and D.Y. Hong. 2001. Further evidence for paraphyly in the Celtidaceae from the chloroplast gene matK. Plant Systematics and Evolution 228:107-115.
31. Spangler, R.E. and R.G. Olmstead. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of Bignoniaceae based on the cpDNA gene sequences rbcL and ndhF. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86:33-46.
32. Swensen, S.M., B.C. Mullin, and M.W. Chase. 1994. Phylogenetic affinities of Datiscaceae based on an analysis of nuclear sequences from the plastid rbcL gene. Systematic Botany 19:157-168.
33. Wagstaff, S.J., and M.I. Dawson. 2000. Classification, origin and patterns of diversification of Corynocarpus (Corynocarpaceae) inferred from DNA sequence. Systematic Botany 25:134-149.
34. Wen, J., G.M. Plunkett, A.D. Mitchell, and S.J. Wagstaff. 2001. The evolution of Araliaceae: A phylogenetic analysis based on ITS sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Systematic Botany 26:144-167.
35. Westoby, M., M.R. Leishman, and J.M. Lord. 1995. On misinterpreting the "phylogenetic correction." Journal of Ecology 83:531-534.
36. nd Edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 718 pp.