Right-branching in English derivational morphology

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 279-307

  Berg, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144455793     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674303001114     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adams, V. (1973). An introduction to modern English word formation. London: Longman
2. Adams, V. (2001). Complex words in English. Harlow: Longman
3. Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
4. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
5. Aronoff, M. & S. N. Sridhar (1983). Morphological levels in English and Kannada or atarizing Reagan. In Richardson, J. F., M. Marks & A. Chukerman (eds.), Papers from the parasession on the interplay of phonology, morphology and syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 3-16
6. Baayen, H. (1991). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 4: 109-49
7. Baayen, R. H. & A. Renouf (1996). Chronicling the Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72: 69-96
8. Bauer, B. L. M. (1995). The emergence and development of SVO patterning in Latin and French. New York: Oxford University Press
9. Bauer, L. (1988). Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
10. Bierwisch, M. (1987). A structural paradox in lexical knowledge. In Meer, E. van der & J. Hoffmann (eds.), Knowledge aided information processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 141-72
11. Bolinger, D. & D. A. Sears (1981). Aspects of language. 3rd edition. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich
12. Booij, G. E. (1988). The relation between inheritance and argument linking: deverbal nouns in Dutch. In Everaert, M., A. Evers, R. Huybregts & M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and modularity. Dordrecht: Foris. 57-73
13. Booij, G. E. (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Clarendon Press
14. Booij, G. E. & J. Rubach (1984). Morphological and prosodic domains in Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 1: 1-27
15. Burnage, G. (1990). CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: Center for Lexical Information
16. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1992). Current morphology. London: Routledge
17. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The origins of complex language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
18. Chomsky, N. & M. Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row
19. Coates, R. (1999). Word structure. London: Routledge
20. Cutler, A. (1980). Productivity in word formation. Papers from the regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 16: 45-51
21. Cutler, A. & D. M. Carter (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language 2: 133-42
22. Dressier, W. U. (1987). Word formation (WF) as part of natural morphology. In Dressier, W. U. (ed.), Leitmotifs in natural morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 99-126
23. Dryer, M. S. (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81-138
24. Falk, Y. N. (1991). Bracketing paradoxes without brackets. Lingua 84: 25-42
25. Frauenfelder, U. & R. Schreuder (1991). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: the role of productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 4: 165-83
26. Frazier, L. & K. Rayner (1988). Parameterizing the language processing system: left vs. right-branching within and across languages. In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining language universals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 247-79
27. Hall, C. J. (1988). Integrating diachronic and processing principles in explaining the suffixing preference. In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining language universals. Oxford: Blackwell. 321-49
28. Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold
29. Jensen, J. T. (1990). Morphology. Word structure in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
30. Kang, B. (1993). Unhappier is really a 'bracketing paradox'. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 788-94
31. Kastovsky, D. (1995). Wortbildung. In Ahrens, R., W.-D. Bald & W. Hüllen (eds.), Handbuch Englisch als Fremdsprache. Berlin: Schmidt. 104-9
32. Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. London: Macmillan
33. Krott, A., R. Schreuder & R. H. Baayen (1999). Complex words in complex words. Linguistics 37: 905-26
34. Laeufer, C. (1995). Morphology and syllabification domains. Lingua 97: 101-21
35. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In Saporta, S. (ed.), Psycholinguistics. A book of readings. New York: Rinehart and Winston, 1961. 180-98
36. Levelt, W. J. M., A. Roelofs & A. S. Meyer (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1-75
37. Libben, G. (1993). Are morphological structures computed during word recognition? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22: 535-44
38. Lieber, R. (1981). On the organization of the lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club
39. Lieber, R. (1992). Compounding in English. Rivista di Linguistica 4: 79-96
40. Lieber, R. & J. Mugdan (2000). Internal structure of words. In Booij, G. et al. (eds.), Morphology, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 404-16
41. Lust, B. (1983). On the notion 'principal branching direction': a parameter of universal grammar. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition. Tokyo: Monbusho. 137-51
42. Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word formation. Munich: Beck
43. Marslen-Wilson, W., L. K. Tyler, R. Waksler & L. Older (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101: 3-33
44. Mazuka, R. (1998). The development of language processing strategies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
45. Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Foris
46. Muysken, P. (1986). Approaches to affix order. Linguistics 24: 629-43
47. Packard, J. L. (2000). The morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
48. Pesetzky, D. (1985). Morphology and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 193-246
49. Plag, I. (1999). Morphological productivity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
50. Raffelsiefen, R. (1992). A nonconfigurational approach to morphology. In Aronoff, M. (ed.), Morphology now. New York: State University of New York Press. 133-62
51. Rubach, J. & G. E. Booij (1990). Edge of constituent effects in Polish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 427-63
52. Sampson, G. (1997). Depth in English grammar. Journal of Linguistics 33: 131-51
53. Scalise, S. (1986). Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris
54. Scalise, S. (1988). Inflection and derivation. Linguistics 26: 561-81
55. Schane, S. A. (1979). The rhythmic nature of English word accentuation. Language 55: 559-602
56. Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
57. Siegel, D. (1979). Topics in English morphology. New York: Garland
58. Spencer, A. (1988). Bracketing paradoxes and the English lexicon. Language 64: 663-82
59. Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell
60. Spencer, A. (1996). Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell
61. Sproat, R. (1988). Bracketing paradoxes, cliticization and other topics: the mapping between syntactic and phonological structure. In Everaert, M., A. Evers, R. Huybregts & M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and modularity. Dordrecht: Foris. 339-60
62. Sproat, R. (1992). Unhappier is not a 'bracketing paradox'. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 347-52
63. Strauss, S. L. (1982). On 'relatedness paradoxes' and related paradoxes. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 694-700
64. Stump, G. T. (1991). A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67: 675-725
65. Szymanek, B. (1998). Introduction to morphological analysis. Warsaw: Wydavonictwo Naukowe PWN
66. Tietze, G. D. A. (1974). Einführung in die Wortbildung des heutigen Englisch. Tübingen: Niemeyer
67. Warren, B. (1978). Semantic patterns of noun-noun compounds. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis
68. Wells, J. C. (1990). Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow: Longman
69. Wells, R. S. (1947). Immediate constituents. Language 23: 81-117
70. Williams, E. (1981). On the notions 'lexically related' and 'head of a word'. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245-74
71. Yngve, V. H. (1960). A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104: 444-66