Depth in English grammar

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 131-151

  Sampson, Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010165143     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226796006317     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aho, A. V., Hopcroft, J. E. & Ullman, J. D. (1974). The design and analysis of computer algorithms. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Black, E., Garside, R. G. & Leech, G. N. (eds.) (1993). Statistically-driven computer grammars of English: the IBM}Lancaster approach. (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 8.) Amsterdam: Rodopi.
3. Booth, T. L. & Thompson, R. A. (1973). Applying probability measures to abstract languages. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-22. 442-450.
4. Church, K. W. (1982). On memory limitations in natural language processing. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
5. De Roeck, A., Johnson, R., King, M., Rosner, M., Sampson, G. R. & Varile, N. (1982). A myth about centre-embedding. Lingua 58. 327-340.
6. Ellega/ rd, A. (1978). The syntactic structure of English texts : a computer-based study of four kinds of text in the Brown University Corpus. (Gothenburg Studies in English 43.) Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
7. Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G. & Garrett, M. F. (eds.) (1974). The psychology of language: an introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. London: McGraw-Hill.
8. Hofland, K. & Johansson, S. (1982). Word frequencies in British and American English. Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.
9. Jakobson, R. (ed.) (1961). Structure of language and its mathematical aspects. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics 12. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
10. Knuth, D. E. (1973). The art of computer programming: vol., sorting and searching. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11. Lees, R. B. (1961). Comments on Hockett's paper. In Jakobson (1961). 266-267.
12. Lyons, J. (1991). Chomsky. (3rd edn.) London: Fontana.
13. Miller, G. A. & Chomsky, A. N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R. & Galanter, E. (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 2. London: Wiley.
14. Reich, P. A. (1969). The finiteness of natural language. Language 45. 831-843. (Reprinted in Householder (1972). 258-272.)
15. Sampson, G. R. (1995). English for the computer: the SUSANNE Corpus and analytic scheme. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Sampson, G. R. (1996). From central embedding to corpus linguistics. In Thomas, J. & Short, M. H. (eds.) Using corpora for linguistic research. London: Longman. 14-26.
17. Sampson, G. R., Haigh, R. & Atwell, E. S. (1989). Natural language analysis by stochastic optimization: a progress report on Project APRIL. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1. 271-287.
18. Stabler, E. P., Jr (1991). Avoid the pedestrian's paradox. In Berwick, R. C., Abney, S. P. & Tenny, C. (eds.) Principle-based parsing : computation and psycholinguistics. London: Kluwer. 199-237.
19. Stabler, E. P. (1994). The finite connectivity of linguistic structure. In Clifton, C., Jr, Frazier, L. & Rayner, K. (eds.) Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 303-336.
20. Steedman, M. J. (1989). Grammar, interpretation, and processing from the lexicon. In Marslen-Wilson, W. (ed.) Lexical representation and process. London: MIT Press. 463-504.
21. Tesnie’ re, L. (1965). EleUments de syntaxe structurale (2nd edn.). Paris: Klincksieck.
22. Yngve, V. H. (1960). A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104. 444-466.
23. Yngve, V. H. (1961). The depth hypothesis. In Jakobson (1961). 130-138. (Reprinted in Householder (1972). 115-123.)