Wind pollination, sexual dimorphism, and changes in floral traits of Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1492-1502

  Golonka, Annette M ^a,b   Sakai, Ann K ^a   Weller, Stephen G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Caryophyllaceae; Dioecy; Gynodioecy; Hawaiian Islands; Schiedea; Sex allocation; Sexual dimorphism; Wind pollination

Indexed keywords

ANEMOPHILY; FLORAL TRAIT; SEX ALLOCATION; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; TRADE-OFF;

CARYOPHYLLACEAE; SCHIEDEA;

EID: 23944476549     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.9.1492     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ASHMAN, T. L. 1999. Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 648-661.
2. ASHMAN, T. L. 2003. Constraints on the evolution of males and sexual dimorphism: field estimates of genetic architecture of reproductive traits in three populations of gynodioecious Fragaria virginiana. Evolution 57: 2012-2025.
3. ASHMAN, T. L., AND C. DIEFENDERFER. 2001. Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. American Naturalist 157: 334-347.
4. BELL, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 224: 223-265.
5. BERTIN, R. I. 1989. Pollination biology. In W. G. Abrahamson [ed.], Plant-animal interactions, 23-86. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
6. CAMPBELL, D. R. 2000. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 227-232.
7. CASE, A., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2004. Floral biology of gender monomorphism and dimorphism in Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae) in western Australia. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 289-301.
8. CHARLESWORTH, B., AND D. CHARLESWORTH. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
9. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1999. Theories of the evolution of dioecy. In M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph [eds.], Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants, 33-60. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
10. COSTICH, D. E., AND T. R. MEAGHER. 2001. Impacts of floral gender and whole-plant gender on floral evolution in Echballium elaterium (Cucurbitaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 74: 475-487.
11. CULLEY, T. M., S. G. WELLER, AND A. K. SAKAI. 2002. The evolution of wind pollination in angiosperms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 361-369, plus corrigendum.
12. DAFNI, A. 1992. Pollination ecology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
13. DELPH, L. F., AND S. B. CARROLL. 2001. Factors affecting relative seed fitness and female frequency in a gynodioecious species, Silene acaulis, Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: 487-505.
14. DELPH, L. F., L. F. GALLOWAY, AND M. L. STANTON. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in flower size. American Naturalist 148: 299-320.
15. DELPH, L. F., J. L. GEHRING, F. M. FREY, A. M. ARNTZ, AND M. LEVRI. 2004. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58: 1936-1946.
16. DELPH, L. F., F. N. KNAPCZYK, AND D. R. TAYLOR. 2002. Among-population variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traits of Silene latifolia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 1011-1020.
17. ECKHART, V. M. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph [eds.], Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants, 123-148. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
18. FAEGRI, K., AND L. VAN DER PIJL. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, New York, New York, USA.
19. FREEMAN, D. C., J. L. DOUST, A. EL-KEBLAWY, K. J. MIGLIA, AND E. D. MCARTHUR. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Botanical Review 63: 66-92.
20. GEBER, M. A., T. E. DAWSON, AND L. F. DELPH [EDS.] 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Germany.
21. KEARNS, C. A., AND D. W. INOUYE. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University of Colorado Press, Niwot, Colorado, USA.
22. LANDE, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
23. LLOYD, D. G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325-339.
24. LLOYD, D. G. 1979. Evolution towards dioecy in heterostylous populations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 131: 71-80.
25. LLOYD, D. G., AND C. J. WEBB. 1977. Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43: 177-216.
26. MAZER, S. J., AND U.-M. HULTGARD. 1993. Variation and covariation among floral traits within and among four species of northern European Primula (Primulaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 474-485.
27. MEAGHER, T. R. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). I. Genetic variation. Evolution 46: 445-457.
28. MEAGHER, T. R. 1994. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae) II. Response to sex-specific selection. Evolution 48: 939-951.
29. MILLER, J. S., AND D. L. VENABLE. 2003. Floral morphometrics and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Lycium (Solanaceae). Evolution 57: 74-86.
30. NEPOKROEFF, M., W. L. WAGNER, P. S. SOLTIS, S. G. WELLER, D. E. SOLTIS, A. K. SAKAI, AND E. A. ZIMMER. 2005. Phylogeny of Schiedea. In W. L. Wagner, S. G. Weller, and A. K. Sakai. Monograph of Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae-Alsinoideae), 13-20. Systematic Botany Monographs 72: 1-169.
31. NIKLAS, K. J. 1985. The aerodynamics of wind pollination. Botanical Review 51: 328-386.
32. PARACHNOWITSCH, A. L., AND E. ELLE. 2004. Variation in sex allocation and male-female trade-offs in six populations of Collinsia parviflora (Scrophulariaceae s.l.). American Journal of Botany 91: 1200-1207.
33. RAMULA, S., AND P. MUTIKAINEN. 2003. Sex allocation of females and hermaphrodites in the gynodioecious Geranium sylvaticum. Annals of Botany 92: 207-213.
34. RANKIN, A. E., S. G. WELLER, AND A. K. SAKAI. 2002. Mating system instability in Schiedea menziesii (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 56: 1574-1585.
35. REEVE, J. P., AND D. J. FAIRBAIRN. 2001. Predicting the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 244-254.
36. RENNER, S. S., AND R. E. RICKLEFS. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
37. SAKAI, A. K., K. KAROLY, AND S. G. WELLER. 1989. Inbreeding depression in Schiedea globosa and S. salicaria (Caryophyllaceae), subdioecious and gynodioecious Hawaiian species. American Journal of Botany 76: 437-444.
38. SAKAI, A. K., S. G. WELLER, M.-L. CHEN, S.-Y. CHOU, AND C. TASANONT. 1997a. Evolution of gynodioecy and maintenance of females: the role of inbreeding depression, outcrossing rates, and resource allocation in Schiedea adamantis (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 51: 724-736.
39. SAKAI, A. K., S. G. WELLER, W. L. WAGNER, P. S. SOLTIS, AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1997b. Phylogenetic perspectives on the evolution of dioecy: adaptive radiation in the endemic Hawaiian genera Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae). In T. Givnish and K. Sytsma [eds.], Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation, 455-474. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
40. SAS INSTITUTE. 2001. SAS version 8.02. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
41. SCHULTZ, S. T. 2003. Sexual dimorphism in gynodioecious Sidalcea hirtipes (Malvaceae). II. Floral traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 175-180.
42. SHYKOFF, J. A., S.-O. KOLOKOTRONIS, C. L. COLLIN, AND M. LOPEZ-VILLAVICENCIO. 2003. Effects of male sterility on reproductive traits in gynodioecious plants: a meta-analysis. Oecologia 135: 1-9.
43. SOLTIS, P. E., D. E. SOLTIS, S. G. WELLER, A. K. SAKAI, AND W. L. WAGNER. 1996. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Hawaiian endemics Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae). Systematic Botany 21: 365-379.
44. STEVEN, J. C., AND D. M. WALLER. 2004. Reproductive alternatives to insect pollination in four species of Thalictrum (Ranunculaceae). Plant Species Biology 19: 73-80.
45. THOMSON, J. D., AND J. BRUNET. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 11-16.
46. VAUGHTON, G., AND M. RAMSEY. 2002. Evidence of gynodioecy and sex ratio variation in Wurmbea biglandulosa (Colchicaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 232: 167-179.
47. WAGNER, W. L., S. G. WELLER, AND A. K. SAKAI. 1995, Phytogeny and biogeography in Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae). In W. L. Wagner and V. A. Funk [eds.], Hawaiian biogeography: evolution on a hot spot archipelago, 221-258. Smithsonian Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
48. WAGNER, W. L., S. G. WELLER, AND A. K. SAKAI. 2005. Monograph of Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae-Alsinoideae). Systematic Botany Monographs 72: 1-169.
49. WELLER, S. G., AND A. K. SAKAI. 1990. The evolution of dicliny in Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae), an endemic Hawaiian genus. Plant Species Biology 5: 83-95.
50. WELLER, S. G., AND A. K. SAKAI. 1991. The genetic basis of male sterility in Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae), an endemic Hawaiian genus. Heredity 67: 265-273.
51. WELLER, S. G., AND A. K. SAKAI. 2005. Selfing and resource allocation in Schiedea salicaria (Caryophyllaceae), a gynodioecious species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 301-308.
52. WELLER, S. G., A. K. SAKAI, A. E. RANKIN, A. GOLONKA, B. KUTCHER, AND K. E. ASHBY. 1998. Dioecy and the evolution of pollination systems in Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae) in the Hawaiian Islands. American Journal of Botany 85: 1377-1388.
53. WELLER, S. G., W. L. WAGNER, AND A. K. SAKAI. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae): implications for the evolution of breeding systems. Systematic Botany 20: 315-337.