Discordant patterns of morphological variation in genetically divergent populations of ornate shrews (Sorex ornatus)

Journal of Mammalogy

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 886-896

  Maldonado, Jesús E ^a,b   Hertel, Fritz ^a,c   Vilà, Carles ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Cranium; Genetic differentiation; Morphometrics; Skull; Sorex vagrans; Subspecies

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; MORPHOMETRY; PHYLOGENY; SKULL; TAXONOMY;

BAJA CALIFORNIA [(PNN) MEXICO]; CALIFORNIA; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

SOREX MONTICOLUS; SOREX ORNATUS; SOREX VAGRANS; SORICIDAE;

EID: 23844519329     PISSN: 00222372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2004)085<0886:DPOMVI>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BARRATT, E. M., ET AL. 1997. DNA answers the call of pipistrelle bat species. Nature 387:138-139.
2. BARROWCLOUGH, G. F. 1982. Geographic variation predictiveness and subspecies. Auk 99:601-603.
3. BROWN, R. J., AND R. L RUDD. 1981. Chromosomal comparison within the Sorex ornatus - S. vagrans complex. Wassman Journal of Biology 39:30-35.
4. CARRAWAY, L. N. 1990. A morphologic and morphometric analysis of the "Sorex vagrans species complex" in the Pacific Coast region. Special Publications, The Museum, Texas Tech University 32:1-78
5. CARRAWAY, L. N. 1995. A key to recent Soricidae of western United States and Canada based primarily on dentaries. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 175:1-49.
6. CASTEIG, F. J., AND M. C. ESCALA. 1988. Morfometría de Sorex coronatus Millet, 1828 (Insectivora, Mammalia) en Navarra. Miscelánia Zoológica 12:309-317.
7. COLLINS, P. W., AND S. B. GEORGE. 1990. Systematics and taxonomy of island and mainland populations of Reithrodontomys megalotis in southern California. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 420:1-26.
8. CRANDALL, K. A., O. R. P. BININDA-EMONDS, G. M. MACE, AND R. K. WAYNE. 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:290-295.
9. DEMBOSKI, J. R., AND J. A. COOK. 2001. Phylogeography of the dusky shrew, Sorex monticolus (Insectivora, Soricidae): insight into deep and shallow history in northwestern North America. Molecular Ecology 10:1227-1240.
10. GEORGE, S. B., AND J. D. SMITH. 1991. Inter- and intra-specific variability among coastal and island populations of Sorex monticolus and Sorex vagrans in the Pacific Northwest. Special Publications, Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico 1:75-91.
11. GONZÁLEZ, S., F. ÁLVAREZ, AND J.E. MALDONADO. 2002. Morphometric differentiation of the endangered pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus l. 1758). Journal of Mammalogy 83:1127-1140.
12. GISBERT, J., M. J. LÓPEZ-FUSTER, R. GARCÍA-PEREA, AND J. VENTURA. 1988. Distribution and biometry of Sorex granarius (Miller, 1910) (Soricinae: Insectivora). Zeitschrift für Säugertierkunde 53:267-275.
13. HAFNER, M. S., W. L. GANNON, J. SALAZAR-BRAVO, AND S. T. ÁLVAREZ-CASTAÑEDA. 1997. Mammal collections in the western hemisphere: a survey and directory of existing collections. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
14. HALL, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America. Volume 1. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
15. JUNGE, J. A., AND R. S. HOFFMANN. 1981. An annotated key to the long-tailed shrews (genus Sorex) of the United States and Canada, with notes on Middle American Sorex. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 94:1-48.
16. KIRKLAND, G. L., JR. 1977. A reexamination of the subspecific status of the Maryland shrew Sorex cinereus fontinalis Hollister. Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 51:43-46.
17. KURTÉN, B. 1967. Pleistocene mammals of Europe. Aldine Publication Company, Chicago, Illinois.
18. KURTÉN, B., AND E. ANDERSON. 1980. Pleistocene mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, New York.
19. Losos, J. B., K. I. WARHEIT, AND T. W. SCHOENER. 1997. Adaptive differentiation following experimental island colonization in Anolis lizards. Nature 387:70-73.
20. LUNDELIUS, E. L., JR., ET AL. 1983. Terrestrial vertebrate faunas. Pp. 311-353 in Late Quaternary environments of the United States (H. E. Wright, Jr., and S.C. Porter, eds.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
21. MALDONADO, J. E. 1999. Family Soricidae. Pp 39-52 in Mamíferos del noroeste de México (S. T. Álvarez-Castañeda and J. L. Patton, eds.). Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste, S.C. Baja California, México.
22. MALDONADO, J. E., C. VILÀ, AND R. K. WAYNE. 2001. Tripartite genetic subdivisions in the ornate shrew (Sorex ornatus). Molecular Ecology 10:127-147.
23. MANTEL, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27:209-220.
24. MILLER-BUTTERWORTH, C. M., D. S. JACOBS, AND E. H. HARLEY. 2003. Strong population substructure is correlated with morphology and ecology in a migratory bat. Nature 424:187-191.
25. MORITZ, C. 1994. Defining 'evolutionary significant units' for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:373-375.
26. MORRISON, D. F. 1967. Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
27. OWEN, J. G., AND R. S. HOFFMANN. 1983. Sorex ornatus. Mammalian Species 212:1-5.
28. PATTON, J. L., AND P. V. BRYLSKI. 1987. Pocket gophers in alfalfa fields: causes and consequences of habitat related body size variation. American Naturalist 130:493-506.
29. PAXINOS, E., H. F. JAMES, S. L. OLSON, M. D. SORENSON, AND R. C. FLEISCHER. 2002. MtDNA from fossils reveals a radiation of Hawaiian geese recently derived from the Canada goose (Branta canadensis). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:1399-1404.
30. PIMENTEL, R. A., AND J. D. SMITH. 1986. BIOΣTAT II: a multivariate statistical toolbox. Sigma Soft, Placentia, California.
31. POLLY, D. P. 2001. On morphological clocks and paleophylogeography: towards a timescale for Sorex hybrid zones. Genetica 112/ 113:339-357.
32. REPENNING, C. A. 1967. Subfamilies and genera of the Soricidae: classification, historical zoogeography, and temporal correlation of the shrews. Geological Survey Professional Papers 565:1-74.
33. ROCA, A. L., N. GEORGIADIS, J. PECON-SLATTERY, AND S. J. O'BRIEN. 2001. Genetic evidence for two species of elephant in Africa. Science 293:1473-1477.
34. RUDD, R. L. 1955. Population variation and hybridization in some Californian shrews. Systematic Zoology 4:21-34.
35. STRAUSS, R. E., AND F. L. BOOKSTEIN. 1982. The truss body form reconstructions in morphometrics. Systematic Zoology 31:113-135.
36. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
37. TALBOT, S. L., AND G. F. SHIELDS. 1996. Phylogeography of brown bears (Ursus arctos) of Alaska and paraphyly within the Ursidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5:477-494.
38. USFWS. 2002. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Endangered Status for the Buena Vista Lake shrew (Sorex ornatus relictus). United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Register 67:10101-10113.
39. VAN ZYLL DE JONG, C. G. 1980. Systematic relationships of woodland and prairie forms of the common shrew Sorex cinereus cinereus Kerr and S. c. haydeni Baird, in the Canadian prairie provinces. Journal of Mammalogy 61:66-75.
40. VAN ZYLL DE JONG, C. G., AND G. L. KIRKLAND, JR. 1989. A morphometric analysis of the Sorex cinereus group in central and eastern North America. Journal of Mammalogy 70:110-122.
41. WAITS, L. P., S. L. TALBOT, R. H. WARDS, AND G. F. SHIELDS. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the North American brown bear and implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 12:408-417
42. WILKINSON, L. 1988. SYSTAT: The system for statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, Illinois.
43. WILLIAMS, D. F. 1979. Checklist of California mammals. Annals of Carnegie Museum 48:425-433.
44. WILLIAMS, D. F. 1986. Mammalian species of special concern in California. Wildlife Management Division Administrative Report 86-1 (June 1986).
45. WILLMANN, R. 1986. Reproductive isolation and the limits of the species in time. Cladistics 2:356-358.