Evaluation of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass graft flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 631-637

  Salm, Liesbeth P ^a   Vliegen, Hubert W ^a   Langerak, Susan E ^a   Bax, Jeroen J ^a   Jukema, J Wouter ^a,b   Zwinderman, Aeilko H ^c   Lamb, Hildo J ^a   De Roos, Albert ^a   Van Der Wall, Ernst E ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Coronary flow reserve; Flow velocity mapping; Saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECIPIENT; ROC CURVE; SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT;

EID: 23844504521     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/JCMR-200065591     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. White CW. Clinical applications of Doppler coronary flow reserve measurements. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71:10d-16d.
2. Chandrasekar B, Doucet S, Bilodeau L, Crepeau J, deGuise P, Gregoire J, Gallo R, Cote G, Bonan R, Joyal M, Gosselin G, Tanguay JF, Dyrda I, Bois M, Pasternac A. Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: a single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52:289-295.
3. Laskey W, Boyle J, Johnson LW. Multivariable model for prediction of risk of significant complication during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1993; 30:185-190.
4. Krone RJ, Johnson L, Noto T. Five year trends in cardiac catheterization: a report from the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1996; 39:31-35.
5. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Cruz BP, Shimono T, Tokui T, Yada I, Takeda K, Higgins CB. Mr flow measurement in the internal mammary artery-to-coronary artery bypass graft: comparison with graft stenosis at radiographic angiography. Radiology 2001; 220:441-447.
6. Galjee MA, van Rossum AC, Doesburg T, van Eenige MJ, Visser CA. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patency and function of coronary artery bypass grafts. An angiographically controlled study. Circulation 1996; 93:660-666.
7. Bedaux WL, Hofman MB, Vyt SL, Bronzwaer JG, Visser CA, van Rossum AC. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance determination of flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:1848-1855.
8. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, Kunz P, Zwinderman AH, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipient coronary arteries. Circulation 2003; 107:1502-1508.
9. Heller LI, Cates C, Popma J, Deckelbaum LI, Joye JD, Dahlberg ST, Villegas BJ, Arnold A, Kipperman R, Grinstead WC, Balcom S, Ma Y, Cleman M, Steingart RM, Leppo JA. Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201T1 imaging and coronary angiography. FACTS Study Group. Circulation 1997; 96:484-490.
10. Deychak YA, Segal J, Reiner JS, Rohrbeck SC, Thompson MA, Lundergan CF, Ross AM, Wasserman AG. Doppler guide wire flow-velocity indexes measured distal to coronary stenoses associated with reversible thallium perfusion defects. Am Heart J 1995; 129:219-227.
11. Joye JD, Schulman DS, Lasorda D, Farah T, Donohue BC, Reichek N. Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24:940-947.
12. Miller DD, Donohue TJ, Younis LT, Bach RG, Aguirre FV, Wittry MD, Goodgold HM, Chaitman BR, Kern MJ. Correlation of pharmacological 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses. Circulation 1994; 89:215O-2160.
13. Reiber JH, van der Zwet PM, Koning G, von Land CD, van Meurs B, Gerbrands JJ, Buis B, van Voorthuisen AE. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1993; 28:187-198.
14. Reiber JH, Jukema W, van Boven A, van Houdt RM, Lie KI, Bruschke AV. Catheter sizes for quantitative coronary arteriography. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1994; 33:153-155.
15. Langerak SE, Kunz P, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, Zwinderman AH, Steendijk P, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Magnetic resonance flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts: a validation study with Doppler flow measurements. Radiology 2002; 222:127-135.
16. Langerak SE, Kunz P, Vliegen HW, Lamb HJ, Jukema JW, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Improved MR flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts during adenosine-induced stress. Radiology 2001; 218:540-547.
17. Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, Zwinderman AH, Lamb HJ, de Roos A, van der Wall EE. Vein graft function improvement after percutaneous intervention: evaluation with MR flow mapping. Radiology 2003; 228:834-841.
18. Hoogendoom LI, Pattynama PM, Buis B, van der Geest RJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75:845-848.
19. Kern MJ, Meier B. Evaluation of the culprit plaque and the physiological significance of coronary atherosclerotic narrowings. Circulation 2001; 103:3142-3149.
20. Chamuleau SA, Meuwissen M, Eck-Smit BL, Koch KT, de Jong A, de Winter RJ, Schotborgh CE, Bax M, Verberne HJ, Tijssen JG, Piek JJ. Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:1316-1322.
21. Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 1998; 97:916-931.
22. Chen L, Theroux P, Lesperance J, Shabani F, Thibault B, De Guise P. Angiographic features of vein grafts versus ungrafted coronary arteries in patients with unstable angina and previous bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:1493-1499.
23. Bates ER, Vogel RA, LeFree MT, Kirlin PC, O'Neill WW, Pitt B. The chronic coronary flow reserve provided by saphenous vein bypass grafts as determined by digital coronary radiography. Am Heart J 1984; 108:462-468.
24. Campisi R, Czemin J, Karpman HL, Schelbert HR. Coronary vasodilatory capacity and flow reserve in normal myocardium supplied by bypass grafts late after surgery. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80:27-31.
25. Klein LW, Agarwal JB, Schneider RM, Hermann G, Weintraub WS, Helfant RH. Effects of previous myocardial infarction on measurements of reactive hyperemia and the coronary vascular reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8:357-363.
26. Wu E, Judd RM, Vargas JD, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ. Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001; 357:21-28.
27. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:1985-1991.