Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: Comparison with 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography

Circulation

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 484-490

  Heller, Louis I ^a   Cates, Christopher ^b   Popma, Jeffrey ^c   Deckelbaum, Lawrence I ^d   Joye, James D ^e   Dahlberg, Seth T ^f   Villegas, Bernard J ^f   Arnold, Anita ^g   Kipperman, Robert ^h   Grinstead, W Carter ⁱ   Balcom, Sharon ^f   Ma, Yunsheng ^f   Cleman, Michael ^j   Steingart, Richard M ^a   Leppo, Jeffrey A ^f  

^a WINTHROP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^g St Luke's Hospital Milwaukee   (United States)

^h Galicia Medical Group   (United States)

ⁱ HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^j YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Angiography; Imaging; Regional blood flow; Stenosis; Ultrasonics

Indexed keywords

THALLIUM 201;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

EID: 18244416078     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.96.2.484     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Graves EJ. 1993 Summary: National Hospital Discharge Survey. Atlanta, Ga: Center for Disease Control/National Center for Health Statistics; 1995. US Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare publication.
2. Marcus M, Skorton DJ, Johnson MR, Collins SM, Harrison DG, Kerber RE. Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: 'a battered gold standard.' J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:882-885.
3. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology: the dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1995;92:2333-2342.
4. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976; 53:627-632.
5. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary angiograms. Circulation. 1977;55:324-328.
6. Detre K, Wright E, Murphy ML, Takaro T. Observer agreement in the evaluation of coronary angiograms. Circulation. 1975;52: 979-986.
7. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med. 1994;310:819-824.
8. Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Cosgrove DM, Bates ER, Muller DW, Schork NJ, Schork MA, Loop FD. Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims database. Circulation. 1993;87:1489-1497.
9. Rensing BJ, Hermans MD, Deckers JW, De Feyler PJ, Tijssen JGP, Serruys PW. Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty nears a Gaussian distribution: a quantitative angiographic study in 1,445 successfully dilated lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:939-945.
10. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:87-94.
11. Gould KL, Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:48-55.
12. Gould KL, Westcott RJ, Albro PC, Hamilton GW. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation, II: clinical methodology and feasibility. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41:279-287.
13. Albro PC, Gould KL, Westcott RJ, Hamilton GW, Ritchie JL, Williams DL. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation, III: clinical trial. Am J Cardiol. 1978;42:751-760.
14. Gould KL. Assessment of coronary stenoses with myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation, IV: limits of detection of stenosis with idealized experimental cross-sectional myocardial imaging. Am J Cardiol. 1978;42:761-768.
15. Gould KL. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation, I: physiologic basis and experimental validation. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41:267-278.
16. Doucette JW, Corl PD, Payne HM, Flynn AE, Goto M, Nassi M, Segal J. Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation. 1992;85: 1899-1911.
17. Estes EH. Electrocardiography and vectorcardiography. In: Hurst JW, Logue RB, eds. The Heart. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1974: chap 21.
18. Czernin J, Muller P, Chan S, Brunken RC, Porenta G, Krivokapich J, Chen K, Chan A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1993;88:62-69.
19. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. The nature of flow of a fluid. In: McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1990: chap 2.
20. Mancini G, Simon S, McGillem M, LeFree M, Friedman H, Vogel R. Automated quantitative coronary angiography: morphologic and physiologic validation of a rapid digital angiographic method. Circulation. 1987;75:452-460.
21. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
22. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1989.
23. Heller LI, Lewis BS, Silver KH, Donohue TJ, Weiner BH, Kern MJ, Kraft PL, Balcom SJ, Deckelbaum LI, for the National FloWire Registry. Proximal coronary flow reserve does not reflect coronary flow reserve distal to significant stenoses. Circulation. 1994;90(part 2):I-227. Abstract.
24. Heller LI, Silver KH, Villegas BJ, Balcom SJ, Weiner BH. Blood flow velocity in the right coronary artery: assessment before and after angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1012-1017.
25. Legrand V, Mancini GB, Bates ER, Hodgson JM, Gross MD, Vogel RA. Comparative study of coronary flow reserve, coronary anatomy and results of radionuclide exercise tests in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;8:1022-1032.
26. Zijlstra F, Fioretti P, Reiber JH, Serruys PW. Which cineangiographically assessed anatomic variable correlates best with functional measurements of stenosis severity? A comparison of quantitative analysis of the coronary cineangiogram with measured coronary flow reserve and exercise/redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:686-691.
27. Deychak YA, Segal J, Reiner JS, Rohrbeck SC, Thompson MA, Lundergran CF, Ross AM, Wasserman AG. Doppler guide wire flow-velocity indexes measured distal to coronary stenoses associated with reversible thallium perfusion defects. Am Heart J. 1995; 129:219-227.
28. 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses. Circulation. 1994;89: 2150-2160.
29. Joye JD, Schulman DS, Lasorda D, Farah T, Donohue BC, Reichek N. Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:940-947.
30. Uren NG, Crake T, Lefroy DC, de Silva R, Davies GJ, Maseri A. Reduced coronary vasodilator function in infarcted and normal myocardium after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994;331: 222-227.
31. Pils NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJRM, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1703-1708.
32. Tron C, Donohue TJ, Bach RG, Aguirre FV, Caracciolo FA, Wolford TL, Miller DD, Kern MJ. Comparison of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve with poststenotic coronary flow reserve for prediction of stress myocardial perfusion imaging results. Am Heart J. 1995;130:723-733.
33. Joye JD, Cates CU, Farah T, Knopf W, Soukas PA, Petruolo SM, Donohue BC, Lasorda D. Cost analysis of intracoronary Doppler determination of lesion significance: preliminary results of the PEACH study. J Inv Cardiol. 1994;7:22A. Abstract.