Monkey perirhinal cortex is critical for visual memory, but not for visual perception: Reexamination of the behavioural evidence from monkeys

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 283-299

  Hampton, Robert R ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; CONFERENCE PAPER; HAPLORHINI; HISTOLOGY; MEMORY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; HAPLORHINI; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 23844497172     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724990444000195     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Bright, P. J., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (this issue). The anatomy of object processing: The role of anteromedial cortex. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50B, 361-377.
2. Buckley, M. J. (this issue). The role of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus in learning, memory and perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50B, 246-268.
3. Buckley, M. J., Booth, M. C. A., Rolls, E. T., & Gaffan, D. (2001). Selective perceptual impairments after perirhinal cortex ablation. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(24), 9824-9836.
4. Buckley, M. J., & Gaffan, D. (1997). Impairment of visual object-discrimination learning after perirhinal cortex ablation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 467-475.
5. Buckley, M. J., & Gaffan, D. (1998a). Perirhinal cortex ablation impairs configural learning and paired-associate learning equally, Neuropsychologia, 36(6), 535-546.
6. Buckley, M. J., & Gaffan, D. (1998b). Perirhinal cortex ablation impairs visual object identification. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(6), 2268-2275.
7. Buffalo, E. A., Ramus, S. J., Clark, R. E., Teng, E., Squire, L. R., & Zola, S. M. (1999). Dissociation between the effects of damage to perirhinal cortex and area TE. Learning & Memory, 6, 572-599.
8. Buffalo, E. A., Ramus, S. J., Squire, L. R., & Zola, S. M. (2000). Perception and recognition memory in monkeys following lesions of area TE and perirhinal cortex. Learning & Memory, 7(6), 375-382.
9. Bussey, T. J., Saksida, L. M., & Murray, E. A. (2002). Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in complex visual discriminations. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15(2), 365-374.
10. Bussey, T. J., Saksida, L. M., & Murray, E. A. (2003). Impairments in visual discrimination after perirhinal cortex lesions: Testing 'declarative' vs. 'perceptual-mnemonic' views of perirhinal cortex function. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17(3), 649-660.
11. Bussey, T. J., Saksida, L. M., & Murray, E. A. (this issue). The perceptual-mnemonic/feature conjugation model of perirhinal function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58B, 269-282.
12. Desimone, R., & Ungerleidcr, L. G. (1989). Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Eacott, M. J., & Gaffan, E. A. (this issue). The roles of the perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, and the fornix in memory for objects, cortexts, and events in the rat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58B, 202-217.
14. Eacott, M. J., Gaffan, D., & Murray, E. A. (1994). Preserved recognition memory for small sets, and impaired stimulus identification for large sets, following rhinal cortex ablations in monkeys. European Journal of Neuroscience, 6(9), 1466-1478.
15. Eacott, M. J., & Heywood, C. A. (1995). Perception and memory: Action and interaction. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology, 9, 311-320.
16. Gaffan, D., & Harrison, S. (1986). Visual identification following inferotemporal ablation in the monkey. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38B, 5-30.
17. Hampton, R. R., & Murray, E. A. (2002). Learning of discriminations is impaired, but generalization to altered views is intact, in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with perirhinal cortex removal. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116(3), 363-377.
18. Jagadeesh, B., Chelazzi, L., Mishkin, M., & Desimone, R. (2001). Learning increases stimulus salience in anterior inferior temporal cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 290-303.
19. Lee, A. C. H., Barense, M. D., & Graham, K. S. (this issue). The contribution of the human medial temporal lobe to perception: Bridging the gap between animal and human studies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, MB, 300-325.
20. Logothetis, N. (1998). Object vision and visual awareness. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 536-544.
21. Meunier, M., Bachevalier, J., Mishkin, M., & Murray, E. A. (1993). Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus-monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 13(12), 5418-5432.
22. Murray, E. A. (2000). Memory for objects in nonhuman primates. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 753-764). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Murray, E. A., & Bussey, T. J. (1999). Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 142-151.
24. Murray, E. A., Gaffan, D., & Mishkin, M. (1993). Neural substrates of visual stimulus stimulus association in rhesus-monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 13(10), 4549-4561.
25. Murray, E. A., Malkova, L., & Goulct, S. (1998). Crossmodal associations, intramodal associations, and object identification in macaque monkeys. In A. Milner (Ed.), Comparative neuropsychology (pp. 51-69). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Murray, E. A., & Mishkin, M. (1986). Visual recognition in monkeys following rhinal cortical ablations combined with either amygdalectomy or hippocampectomy. Journal of Neuroscience, 6(7), 1991-2003.
27. Murray, E. A., & Mishkin, M. (1998). Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(16), 6568-6582.
28. Rolls, E. T., Franco, L., & Stringer, S. M. (this issue). The perirhinal cortex and long-term familiarity memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58B, 234-245.
29. Rudy, J. W., & Sutherland, R. J. (1995). Configurai association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus, 5, 375-389.
30. Saksida, L. M., & Bussey, T. J. (2002). The organization of visual object representations: A connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 355-364.
31. Suzuki, W. A. (1996). Neuroanatomy of the monkey entorhinal, perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices: Organization of cortical inputs and interconnections with amygdala and striatum. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 8, 3-12.
32. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Amaral, D. G., & Suzuki, W. A. (1989). Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal-formation produce severe memory impairment. Journal of Neuroscience, 9(12), 4355-4370.