Issues in assessing multi-institutional performance of BI-RADS-based CAD systems

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 5747, Issue II, 2005, Pages 858-865

  Markey, Mia K ^a   Lo, Joseph Y ^b  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast Neoplasms; Calibration; Diagnosis, Computer Assisted; Mammography; Medical Informatics; Pattern Recognition; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity

Indexed keywords

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; CALIBRATION; HOSPITALS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATHOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TUMORS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 23844496491     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.594706     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Cancer Facts and Figures 2004. 2004, American Cancer Society: Atlanta.
2. Lee, C.H., Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy. Radiologie clinics of North America, 2002. 40: p. 395-407.
3. Sampat, M.P., M.K. Markey, and A.C. Bovik, Computer-aided detection and diagnosis in mammography, in Handbook of Image and Video Processing. 2005, Academic Press.
4. Giger, M.L., Computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions in medical images. Computing in Science & Engineering, 2000. 2(5): p. 39-45.
5. Doi, K., et al., Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. European Journal of Radiology., 1999. 31(2): p. 97-109.
6. Vyborny, C.J., M.L. Giger, and R.M. Nishikawa, Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 2000. 38(4): p. 725-40.
7. Kahn, C.E., Jr., et al., Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Computers in Biology & Medicine, 1997. 27(1): p. 19-29.
8. Wu, Y., et al., Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology, 1993. 187(1): p. 81-7.
9. Baker, J.A., et al., Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology, 1995. 196(3): p. 817-22.
10. Baker, JA., et al., Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations. Radiology, 1996. 198(1): p. 131-5.
11. Floyd, C.E., Jr., J.Y. Lo, and G.D. Tourassi, Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2000. 175(5): p. 1347-52.
12. Lo, J.Y., et al., Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: artificial neural network approach for optimized merging of mammographic features. Academic Radiology, 1995. 2(10): p. 841-50.
13. Lo, J.Y., et al., Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features. Radiology, 1997. 203(1): p. 159-63.
14. Lo, J.Y., et al., Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks. Academic Radiology., 1999. 6(1): p. 10-5.
15. Lo, J.Y., et al., Cross-institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2002. 178(2): p. 457-63.
16. Markey, M.K., et al. Cluster analysis of BI-RADS descriptions of biopsy-proven breast lesions, in Medical Imaging 2002: Image Processing. 2002. San Diego: SPIE.
17. Markey, M.K., et al., Perceptron error surface analysis: a case study in breast cancer diagnosis. Computers in Biology & Medicine, 2002. 32(2): p. 99-109.
18. Markey, M.K., J.Y. Lo, and C.E. Floyd, Jr., Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifications. Radiology, 2002. 223(2): p. 489-93.
19. Tourassi, G.D., et al., A neural network approach to breast cancer diagnosis as a constraint satisfaction problem. Medical Physics, 2001. 28(5): p. 804-11.
20. Markey, M.K., et al., Self-organizing map for cluster analysis of a breast cancer database. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine., 2003. 27(2): p. 113-27.
21. Lo, J.Y., et al. Computer-aided classification of breast microcalcification clusters: merging of features from image processing and radiologists, in Medical Imaging 2003: Image Processing. 2003. San Diego: SPIE.
22. Tourassi, G.D., M.K. Markey, and J.Y. Lo. Validation of a constraint satisfaction neural network for breast cancer diagnosis: new results from 1030 cases, in Medical Imaging 2003: Image Processing. 2003. San Diego: SPIE.
23. Fischer, EA., J.Y. Lo, and M.K. Markey. Bayesian networks of BI-RADS descriptors for breast lesion classification, in IEEE EMBS. 2004.
24. American College of Radiology, Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS™). Third ed. 1998, Reston, VA: College of Radiology American.
25. Heath, M., K.W. Bowyer, and D. Kopans, Current status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography, in Digital Mammography, N. Karssemeijer, M. Thijssen, and J.H. Hendriks, Editors. 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, p. 457-460.
26. Heath, M., et al. The Digital Database for Screening Mammography. in 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. 2000. Toronto, Canada: Medical Physics Publishing.
27. Metz, C.E., Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978. 8(4): p. 283-98.
28. Metz, C.E., ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Investigative Radiology., 1986. 21(9): p. 720-33.
29. Jiang, Y., C.E. Metz, and R.M. Nishikawa, A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. Radiology, 1996(201): p. 745-750.
30. Horsch, K., et al. Prevalence-modified estimation of computer-determined probabilities of malignancy for CAD. in Radiological Society of North America Annual Meeting. 2003. Chicago, IL.