Gender gaps in group listening and speaking: Issues in social constructivist approaches to teaching and learning

Educational Review

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 329-355

  Hunter, Darryl ^a   Gambell, Trevor ^b   Randhawa, Bikkar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744432295     PISSN: 00131911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131910500149416     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Aries, E. (1976) Interactions, patterns and themes of male, female and mixed groups, Small Group Behavior, 7, 7-13.
2. Aries, E. (1977) Male-female interpersonal styles in all male, all female, and mixed groups, in: Alice Sargent (Ed.) Beyond sex roles (St Paul, MN, West Publishing).
3. Bandura, A. (1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning, Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
4. Bandura, A. (1995) Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies, in: A. Bandura (Ed.) Self-efficacy in changing societies (New York, Cambridge University Press), 1-45.
5. Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control (New York, Freeman).
6. Barnes, D. & Todd, F. (1977) Communication and learning in small groups (London, Routledge).
7. Baxter, J. (1999) Teaching girls to speak out: the female voice in public contexts, Language and Education, 13(2), 81-98.
8. Battistich, V., Solomon, D. & Delucchi, K. (1993) Interaction processes and student outcomes in cooperative learning groups, The Elementary School Journal, 4(1), 19-32.
9. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R. & Tarule, J. M. (1986) Women's ways of knowing (New York, Basic Books).
10. Brush, T. (1997) The effects of group composition on achievement and time on task for students completing ILS activities in cooperative pairs, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(1), 1-17.
11. Busch, T. (1996) Gender, group composition, cooperation, and self-efficacy in computer studies, Computer Studies, 15(2), 25-135.
12. Bushweller, K. (1994) Turning our backs on the boys, American School Board Journal, 181(5), 29-35.
13. Charney, D. (1984) The validity of using holistic scoring to evaluate writing: a critical review, Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), 65-81.
14. Coates, J. (1995) Language, gender and career, in: S. Mills (Ed.) Language and gender (London, Longman).
15. Cohen, E. & Lotan, R. (1995) Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom, American Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 99-120.
16. Cook-Sather, A. (2002) Authorizing students' perspectives: toward trust, dialogue, and change in education, Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3-14.
17. Corson, D. (1997) Gender, discourse and senior education: ligatures for girls, options for boys?, in: R. Wodak (Ed.) Gender and discourse (London, Sage).
18. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) (1994) School achievement indicators program: 1994 reading and writing assessment (Toronto, CMEC).
19. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) (1999) School achievement indicators program: 1998 reading and writing II assessment (Toronto, CMEC).
20. Department of Education and Science (DES) (1975) A language for life Report of the Committee of Inquiry of the Secretary of State for Education and Science under the Chairmanship of Sir Alan Bullock (London, HMSO).
21. DiPardo, P. & Freedman, S. (1988) Peer response groups in the writing classroom: theoretical foundations and new directions, Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 119-149.
22. Fishman, P. (1978) Interaction: the work women do, Social Problems, 42, 397-406.
23. Fishman, P. (1980) Conversational insecurity, in: H. Giles, W. P. Robinson & P. Smith (Eds) Language: social psychological perspectives (Oxford, Pergamon), 127-132.
24. Gambell, T. & Hunter, D. (1999) Rethinking gender differences in literacy, Canadian Journal of Education, 24(1), 1-16.
25. Gambell, T. & Hunter, D. (2000) Surveying gender differences in Canadian school literacy, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(5), 689-719.
26. Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992) Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability, Academy of Management Review, 17, 211.
27. Goodwin, M. (1988) Co-operation and competition across girls' play activities, in: J. Coates (Ed.) Language and gender: a reader (Oxford, Blackwell), 121-146.
28. Governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, North-west Territories, Saskatchewan, and Yukon Territory (1998) The common curriculum framework for English language arts: Kindergarten to Grade 12. Western Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Basic Education (Edmonton, AB, Victoria, BC, Winnipeg, MB, Yellowknife, NT, Regina, SK, Whitehorse, YT, Governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, North-west Territories, Saskatchewan, and Yukon Territory).
29. Hunter, D. M. & Randhawa, B. S. (2001) The large-scale, authentic assessment of listening and speaking: issues in reliability, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, XLVII(2), 156-173.
30. Hynds, S. (1997) On the brink: negotiating literature and life with adolescents (New York, Teachers College Press).
31. James, D. & Dratich, J. (1993) Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: a critical review of the research, in: D. Tannen (Ed.) Gender and conversational interaction (New York, Oxford University Press), 281-312.
32. Jenkins, N. & Cheshire, J. (1990) Gender issues in the GCSE Oral English Examination: Part I, Language and Education, 4(4), 261-292.
33. Jenkins, N. & Cheshire, J. (1991) Gender issues in the GCSE Oral English Examination: Part II, Language and Education, 5(1), 19-40.
34. Lee, C. & Bobko, P. (1994) Self-efficacy beliefs: comparison of five measures, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 364-369.
35. Lensmire, T. (1994) Writing workshop as a carnival: reflections on an alternative learning environment, Harvard Educational Review, 64(4), 371-391.
36. Madhok, J. J. (1992) The effect of gender composition on group interaction, in: K. Hall, M. Bucholtz & B. Moonwoman (Eds) Locating power, proceedings of the 2nd Berkeley Women and Language Conference (vol. 2), Berkeley, CA, 4-5 April 1991 (Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of Berkeley), 371-386.
37. Maskit, D. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1986) Adults in cooperative learning: effects of group size and group gender composition on group learning, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, ERIC: ED279788.
38. McCaslin, M., Tuck, D., Wiard, A., Brown, B., LaPage, J. & Pyle, J. (1994) Gender composition and small-group learning in fourth-grade mathematics, The Elementary School Journal, 94, 467-482.
39. National Curriculum Council/National Oracy Project (NCC/NOP) (1991) Teaching, talking and learning at Key Stage 3 (York, National Curriculum Council).
40. Nichols, P. D. & Smith, P. L. (1998) Contextualizing the interpretation of reliability data, Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice, 17(3), 24-36.
41. Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A. & Heck, M. J. (1993) Using small groups for response to and thinking about literature, English Journal, 82(1), 14-22.
42. O'Donnell, C. & Smagorinsky, P. (1999) Revising Ophelia: rethinking questions of gender and power in school, English Journal, 88(3), 35-42.
43. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2002) Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000 (Paris: OECD).
44. Pajares, F. (1996) Self-efficacy in academic settings, Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
45. Perrenet, J. & Terwel, J. (1997, March) Interaction patterns in cooperative groups: The effects of gender, ethnicity and ability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
46. Peterson, S. (1998) Evaluation and teachers' perceptions of gender in sixth-grade student writing, Research in the Teaching of English, 33(2), 181-208.
47. Pope, G., Wentzel, C. & Cammaert, R. (2002) Relationships between gender and Alberta diploma scores, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, XLVIII(4), 275-286.
48. Raign, K. & Sims, B. (1993) Gender, persuasion techniques, and collaboration, Technical Communication Quarterly, 2(1), 89-104.
49. Reis, H. T. (1986) Gender effects in social participation: intimacy, loneliness, and the conduct of social interaction, in: R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds) The merging field of personal relationships (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum), 91-105.
50. Renzetti, C. & Curran, D. (1999) Women, men, and society (4th edn) (Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon).
51. Richards, J. (1980) The sceptical feminist: a philosophic inquiry (Boston, MA, Routlege & Kegan Paul).
52. Roen, D. (1992) Gender and teacher response to student writing, in: N. McCracken & B. Appleby (Eds) Gender issues in the teaching of English (Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann), 126-141.
53. Roth, W. M. (2001) Gestures: their role in teaching and learning, Review of Educational Research, 7(3), 365-392.
54. Sadker, M. & Sadker, D. (1994) Failing at fairness: how America's schools cheat girls (New York, Charles Scribner's).
55. Saskatchewan Education (1999) The 1998 provincial learning assessment in English language arts (listening and speaking) (Regina, SK, Saskatchewan Education) (For instruments and rubrics, see http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/k/pecs/ ae/docs/plap/listenspeak/1998.pdf).
56. Smagorinsky, P. & Fly, P. K. (1994) A new perspective on why small groups do and don't work, English Journal, 83(3), 54-58.
57. Swann, J. (1989) Talk control: an illustration from the classroom of problems in analysing male dominance of conversation, in: J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds) Women in their speech communities (Harlow, NY, Longman), 123-140.
58. Swann, J. & Graddol, D. (1995) Feminising classroom talk?, in: S. Mills (Ed.) Language and gender: interdisciplinary perspectives (London and New York, Longman), 135-148.
59. Tannen, D. (1990) You just don't understand: women and men in conversation (New York, Ballantine Books).
60. th Annual Meeting of the International Listening Association, Seattle, WA.
61. Webb, N. M. (1989) Peer interaction and learning in small groups, International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
62. Webb, N. (1995) Group collaboration in assessment: multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 239-1.
63. Weiner, G., Arnot, M. & David, M. (1996) Education reforms and gender equality in schools (London, Equal Opportunities Commission).
64. Worthen, B. R. (1993) Critical issues that will determine the future of alternative assessment, Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 444-454.
65. Zimmerman, B. (1995) Self-efficacy and educational development, in: A. Bandura (Ed.) Self-efficacy in changing societies (New York, Cambridge University Press), 202-231.
66. Zimmerman, B. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990) Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.