Conceptual design of performance measurement and management systems using a structured engineering approach

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Volumn 54, Issue 5-6, 2005, Pages 385-399

  Sousa, George W L ^a   Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro ^b   Groesbeck, Richard L ^c   Van Aken, Eileen ^c  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Business improvement; Business performance; Management strategy; Performance measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444434536     PISSN: 17410401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17410400510604548     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bititci, U.S., Turner, T. and Begemann, C. (2000), "Dynamics of performance measurement systems", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 692-704.
2. Blanchard, B.S. and Fabrycky, W.J. (1998), Systems Engineering and Analysis, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
3. Boland, T. and Fowler, A. (2000), "A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organizations", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 417-46.
4. Brown, M.G. (1996), Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World-Class Performance, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.
5. Disney, S.M., Naim, M.M. and Towill, D.R. (1997), "Dynamic simulation modeling for lean logistics", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 27 Nos 3/4, pp. 174-96.
6. Globerson, S. (1985), "Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organization", International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 639-46.
7. Groesbeck, R.L., Sousa, G.W.L., Van Aken, E.M. and Coleman, G.D. (2002), "Using systems dynamics modeling to explore interrelationships in a performance measurement scorecard", Proceedings of the 23rd American Society for Engineering Management National Conference, 2-5 October, Tampa, FL, pp. 255-63.
8. Groesbeck, R.L., Sousa, G.W.L., Van Aken, E.M., Carpinetti, L.C.R. and Hall, M. (2004), "System dynamics modeling: a call center learning and decision-support tool", Proceedings of the 2004 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, 16-20 May, Houston, TX, paper 261 in CD-ROM.
9. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D.P. (1996), "Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 75-85.
10. Keating, C.B. (2000), "Limitations for deployment of systems-based initiatives in non-traditional settings", Proceedings of the 21st American Society for Engineering Management National Conference, Washington, DC, 4-7 October.
11. Kennerley, M. and Neely, A. (2000), "Performance measurement frameworks - a review", Proceedings of the Performance Measurement Conference, Cambridge, 19-21 July.
12. Kunsch, P., Chevalier, A. and Brans, J. (2001), "Comparing the adaptive control methodology (ACM) to the financial planning practice of a large international group", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 132-3, pp. 479-89.
13. Kurstedt, H.A. (2000), Management Systems Theory, Applications, and Design, Author, Blacksburg, VA.
14. Lai, C., Ip, W. and Lee, W. (2001), "The system dynamics model for engineering services", Managing Service Quality, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 191-9.
15. Maskell, B. (1989), "Performance measurement for world class manufacturing", Management Accounting, May, pp. 32-3.
16. Neely, A. (1999), "The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next?", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 205-28.
17. Neely, A. and Adams, C. (2000), "Perspectives on performance: the performance prism", in Bourne, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Performance Measurement, Gee Publishing, London.
18. Powell, S.G., Schwaninger, M. and Trimble, C. (2001), "Measurement and control of business processes", System Dynamics Review, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 63-91.
19. Ritchie-Dunham, J.L. and Rabbino, H.T. (2001), Managing from Clarity: Identifying, Aligning, and Leveraging Strategic Resources, Wiley, New York, NY.
20. Santos, S.P., Belton, V. and Howick, S. (2002), "Adding value to performance measurement by using system dynamics and multicriteria analysis", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 11, pp. 1246-72.
21. Sousa, G.W.L., Van Aken, E. and Groesbeck, R.L. (2002), "Applying an enterprise engineering approach to engineering work: a focus on business process modeling", Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 15-24.
22. Senge, P.M. and Kleiner, A. et al. (1994), The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook, Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc., New York, NY.
23. Sterman, J.D. (2000), Business Dynamics - Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
24. Vernadat, F.B. (1996), Enterprise Modeling and Integration: Principles and Applications, Chapman & Hall, London.
25. Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H., Gregory, M., Bourne, M. and Kennerly, M. (2000), "Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 10, pp. 1119-45.
26. Rentes, A., Carpinetti, L.C.R. and Van Aken, E. (2002), "Measurement system development process: a pilot application and recommendations", Proceedings of the Performance Measurement Conference, Boston, MA.