Clinical utility of the Canadian occupational performance measure - Swedish version

Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 40-48

  Wressle, Ewa ^a   Marcusson, Jan ^a   Henriksson, Chris ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; Client centred practice; Evaluation Process, occupational therapy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COUNSELING; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEASUREMENT; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0036177770     PISSN: 00084174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000841740206900104     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Overview of focus group research
2. The use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for the assessment of outcome on a neurorehabilitation unit
3. Comment: Concerns in the analysis of focus group data
4. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
5. Planning a health education programme for the elderly visually impaired person - A focus group study
6. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy
7. Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: Clinical and measurement issues
8. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
9. Client-centred aspects of clinical reasoning during an initial assessment using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
10. Why things (sometimes) go wrong in focus groups
11. Methods of assessing clients priorities: A survey of adult physical dysfunction settings
12. Involvement of adult rehabilitation patients in setting occupational therapy goals
13. Focus groups
14. Barriers to client-centredness and their resolution
15. The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
16. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: What do users consider important?
17. Recovering from a depressive episode using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
18. Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure