Assessing the ethics of ethics research: A case study

IRB Ethics and Human Research

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 9-12

  Miller, Franklin G ^a,b   Wendler, David ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b Institute of Mental Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECUMBENCY; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK; TRUST;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONSENT FORMS; DECEPTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCLOSURE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; RISK; TRUST;

EID: 2342563250     PISSN: 01937758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3564232     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Miller FG. Ethical significance of ethics-related empirical research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002;24:1821-22.
2. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000;283:2701-11.
3. Treschan TA, Scheck T, Kober A, et al. The influence of protocol pain and risk on patients' willingness to consent for clinical studies: A randomized trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2002;96:498-506.
4. See ref. 3, Treschan et al. 2002.
5. Sugarman J. Missing the informed in consent. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2002;96:319-20.
6. See ref. 3, Treschan et al. 2002.
7. Fleming M. Informed consent, deception, and the use of disguised alcohol questionnaires. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1989;15:309-19.
8. See ref. 7, Fleming 1989.
9. Bok S. Shading the truth in seeking informed consent for research purposes. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1995;5:1-17.
10. Wendler D. Deception in medical and behavioral research: Is it ever acceptable? Milbank Quarterly 1996;74:87-114.
11. Simel DL, Feussner JR. A randomized controlled trial comparing quantitative informed consent formats. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1991;44:771-77.
12. See ref. 11, Simel 1991.
13. Wendler D, Miller FG. Deception in the pursuit of science. Archives of Internal Medicine, in press.
14. Baumrind D. Research using intentional deception: Ethical issues revisited. American Psychologist 1985;40:165-74.
15. See ref. 13, Wendler and Miller in press.
16. See ref. 2, Emanuel et al. 2000.