Ethical significance of ethics-related empirical research

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 94, Issue 24, 2002, Pages 1821-1822

  Miller, Franklin G ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL STUDY; EDITORIAL; EMPIRICISM; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 0037132704     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1821     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Joffe S, Weeks JC. Views of American oncologists about the purposes of clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1847-53.
2. Levine RJ. Ethics and regulation of clinical research. 2nd ed. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press, 1986.
3. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000;283:2701-11.
4. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 17:20-4.
5. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Med Care 2002;40(9 Suppl):V55-63.
6. Miller FG, Rosenstein DL, DeRenzo EG. Professional integrity in clinical research. JAMA 1998;280:1449-54.