Missing the informed in consent

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 319-320

  Sugarman, Jeremy ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CLINICAL TRIALS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0037303681     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00004     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Sugarman J, McCrory DC, Powell D, et al. Empirical research on informed consent. Hastings Cent Rep 1999;29:S1-42.
2. Treschan TA, Scheck T, Kober A, et al. The influence of protocol pain and risk on patients' willingness to consent for clinical studies: a randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2003;96:498-506.
3. Lavori PW, Sugarman J, Hays MT, Feussner JR. Improving informed consent in clinical trials: a duty to experiment. Control Clin Trials 1999;20:187-93.