The Effects of Organizational Context on Teacher Expectancy

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 603-634

  Kelley, Carolyn J ^a   Finnigan, Kara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Lack of goal conflict; Principal support; Program fairness; Reward history; School level; Student performance feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342545457     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X03257299     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
2. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
4. Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Incentives and motivation. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations (pp. 104-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Benard, B. (1991). Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
6. Berman, P. W., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1977). Federal program supporting educational change, Vol. VII: Factors affecting implementation and continuation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
7. Beugré, C. D., & Baron, R. A. (2001). Perceptions of systemic justice: The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 324-339.
8. Bliss, J. R. (1991). Strategic and holistic images of effective schools. In J. R. Bliss, W. A. Firestone, & C. E. Richards (Eds.), Rethinking effective schools: Research and practice (pp. 43-57). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Borman, G. D., & Rachuba, L. T. (2001). Academic success among poor and minority students: An analysis of competing models of school effects. Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved February 28, 2003, from http://www.csos.jhu.edu
10. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Clotfelter, C. T., & Ladd, H. F. (1996). Recognizing and rewarding success in public schools. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 23-63). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equity of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
13. Cropanzano, R., & Randall, M. (1993). Injustice and work behavior: A historical review. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 3-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. D'Agostino, J. (2001, April). Does the Title I accountability model motivate teachers in high-poverty schools to improve students' test scores? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Seattle, WA.
15. Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching for high standards: What policymakers need to know and be able to do (Research Rep. No. JRE-04). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
16. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-24.
17. Education Commission of the States. (2002). State performance indicators: January 2002. Denver, CO: Author. Retrieved September 10, 2002, from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/32/12/3212.htm
18. Firestone, W. A., & Herriott, R. E. (1980). Images of the school: An exploration of the social organization of elementary, junior high and high schools. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, Inc.
19. Firestone, W. A., & Herriott, R. E. (1982). Two images of schools as organizations: An explication and illustrative empirical test. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(2), 39-59.
20. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507.
22. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA, Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
23. Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the ends justify the means? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55-61.
24. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 5-44.
25. Heneman, H. G., III. (1998). Assessment of the motivational reactions of teachers to a school-based performance award program. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(1), 43-59.
26. Heneman, H. G., III, & Milanowski, A. T. (1999). Teacher attitudes about school-based performance award programs. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(4), 327-341.
27. Heneman, H. G., III., & Schwab, D. P. (1972). An evaluation of research on expectancy theory predictions of employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 1-9.
28. Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1984). Two images of schools as organizations: A refinement and elaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(4), 41-57.
29. Hoy, W., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Kelley, C. (1998). The Kentucky school-based performance award program: School-level effects. Educational Policy, 12(3), 305-324.
31. Kelley, C., Heneman, H. G., III, & Milanowski, A. (2002). Teacher motivation and school-based performance awards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 372-401.
32. Kelley, C., & Protsik, J. (1997). Risk and reward: Perspectives on the implementation of Kentucky's school-based performance award program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(4), 474-505.
33. Kentucky Department of Education. (1996, May). Kentucky teacher. Frankfort, KY: Author.
34. King, B. (2002). Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 243-257.
35. Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
36. Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis, S. D. Kruse, & Associates. Professional community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
37. Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1995). Effective schools research. In J. Banks & C. McGee (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 525-547). New York: MacMillan.
38. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39. Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D., & Marks, H. M. (1996). School-wide professional community. In F. Newmann & Associates (Eds.) Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179-203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4): 757-798.
41. Miskel, C. (1982). Motivation in educational organizations. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 65-88.
42. Miskel, C., DeFrain, J., & Wilcox, K. (1980). A test of expectancy work motivation theory in educational organizations. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(1), 70-92.
43. Miskel, C., McDonald, D., & Bloom, S. (1983). Structural and expectancy linkages within schools and organizational effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(1), 49-82.
44. Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference, and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1053-1077.
45. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996a). Common core of data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
46. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996b, October). 1993-94 Schools and staffing survey: Data file user's manual. Volume 1: Survey documentation(NCES 96-142). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
47. Natriello, G., McDill, E. L., & Pallas, A. M. (1990). Schooling disadvantaged children: Racing against catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49. Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. L. (1997, April). Enacted curriculum survey items catalogue: Middle school and high school mathematics and science (2nd ed.). Madison: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
50. Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427-452.
51. Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1985). School reform: The district policy implications of the effective schools literature. The Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 353-389.
52. Reidy, E. (1995, September). The Kentucky education reform act and school-based performance awards. Paper presented at the Consortium for Policy Research in Education Conference Series on Teacher Compensation, Washington, DC.
53. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education, 94, 352-388.
54. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1991). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Teachers College.
55. Ross, J. A. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. E. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Expectations in the classroom, Vol. 7 (pp. 49-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
56. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
57. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
58. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
59. WestEd. (2001, October). Are small schools better? School size considerations for safety and learning. (WestEd Policy Brief). San Francisco: Author.
60. Wright, P. S., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.