Scalable photonic quantum computation through cavity-assisted interactions

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2004, Pages

  Duan, L M ^a,b   Kimble, H J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b University of Science and Technology of China   (China)

^c CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPOSITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROUND STATE; LASER PULSES; MIRRORS; NONLINEAR OPTICS; PHASE SHIFT; PHOTONS; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY; RESONANCE; SPONTANEOUS EMISSION; WAVE EQUATIONS;

CAVITY-ASSISTED INTERACTIONS; QUANTUM COMPUTATION; QUANTUM-CONTROLLED PHASE-FLIP GATES; SINGLE-PHOTON PULSES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 2342537603     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127902     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. T. Pellizzari, S. A. Gardiner, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3788 (1995).
2. J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
3. M. S. Zubairy, M. Kim, and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. A 68, 033820 (2003).
4. For a review, see C. Monroe, Nature (London) 416, 238 (2002).
5. J. A. Sauer et al., quant-ph/0309052.
6. J. McKeever et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 90, 133602 (2003); J. McKeever et al., Nature (London) 425, 268 (2003).
7. J. McKeever et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 90, 133602 (2003); J. McKeever et al., Nature (London) 425, 268 (2003).
8. M. Keller et al., Appl. Phys. B 76, 125 (2003).
9. M. A. Rowe et al., Quantum. Inf. Comp. 2, 257 (2002).
10. A. Kuhn, M. Hennrich, and G. Rempe, Phys. Rev. Lett 89, 067901 (2002).
11. I. L. Chuang and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3489 (1995).
12. Q. A. Turchette et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995).
13. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. Milburn, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
14. S. Glancy, J. M. LoSecco, H. M. Vasconcelos, and C. E. Tanner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062317 (2002).
15. A. Imamoglu, H. Schmidt, G. Woods, and M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1467 (1997).
16. K. M. Gheri, K. Ellinger, T. Pellizzari, and P. Zoller, Fortschr. Phys. 46, 401 (1998).
17. C. K. Law and H. J. Kimble, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2067 (1997).
18. J. Preskill, Lecture Notes on Quantum Computation, see http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229
19. K. Banaszek and K. Wodkiewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett 82, 2009 (1999).
20. L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4002 (2000).
21. D. F. Walls, and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).
22. H. J. Kimble, Phys. Scr. T76, 127 (1998).
23. L.-M. Duan, A. Kuzmich, H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. A 67, 032305 (2003).
24. The exact shape of the input pulse is actually not important if the shape changing is sufficiently slow compared to the cavity decay rate K.
25. The photon loss could be also from absorption and scattering by the cavity mirrors, and their contributions (typically small) can be included through a modified atomic spontaneous emission rate.
26. M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5094 (2000).
27. L. M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) 414, 413 (2001).
28. A. Kuzmich et al., Nature (London) 423, 731 (2003).
29. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, quant-ph/0006120.