Sequential effects of propofol on functional brain activation induced by auditory language processing: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 92, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 641-650

  Heinke, W ^a   Fiebach, C J ^b   Schwarzbauer, C ^c   Meyer, M ^d   Olthoff, D ^a   Alter, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia, anaesthetic action; Anaesthetics i.v., propofol; Brain, auditory language processing; Brain, functional magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL CORTEX; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 2342522093     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh133     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Heinke W, Schwarzbauer C. In vivo imaging of anaesthetic action in humans: approaches with positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 112-22
2. Veselis RA, Reinsel RA, Feshchenko VA, Dnistrian AM. A neuroanatomical construct for the amnesic effect of propofol. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 329-37
3. Friederici AD. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn Sci 2002; 6: 78-84
4. Bandettini PA, Wong EC. Magnetic resonance imaging of human brain function. Principles, practicalities, and possibilities. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1997; 8: 345-71
5. Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, et al. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 1995; 373: 607-9
6. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97-113
7. Billard V, Gambus PL, Chamoun N, Stanski DR, Shafer SL. A comparison of spectral edge, delta power, and bispectral index as EEG measures of alfentanil, propofol, and midazolam drug effect. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997; 61: 45-58
8. Burock MA, Buckner RL, Woldroff MG, Rosen BR, Dale AM. Randomized event-related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI. Neuroreport 1998; 9: 3735-9
9. Schmitt F, Stehling MK, Turner R. Echo-planar imaging: theory, technique and application. Berlin: Springer, 1998
10. Norris DG. Reduced power multislice MDEFT imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 445-51
11. Lee JH, Garwood M, Menon R, et al. High contrast and fast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at high fields. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 308-12
12. Lohmann G, Müller K, Bosch V, et al. Lipsia - A new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2001; 25: 449-57
13. Talairach P, Tournoux J. A Stereotactic Coplanar Atlas of the Human Brain. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1998
14. Worsley K, Friston K. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited-again. Neuroimage 1995; 2: 341-52
15. Kiebel SJ, Goebel R Friston KJ. Anatomical informed basis functions. Neuroimage 2000; 11: 656-67
16. Griffiths TD, Warren JD. The planum temporale as a computational hub. Trends Neurosci 2002; 25: 348-53
17. Hickok G, Poeppel D. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4: 131-8
18. Meyer M, Alter K, Friederici AD, Lohmann G, von Cramon DY. FMRI reveals brain regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 17: 73-88
19. Bosch V. Statistical analysis of multi-subject fMRI data: assessment of focal activations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 61-4
20. Friederici AD, Meyer M, von Cramon DY. Auditory language comprehension: an event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain Long 2000; 75: 289-300
21. Attwell D, Iadecola C. The neural basis of functional brain imaging signals. Trends Neurosci 2002; 25: 621-5
22. Shtoyerman E, Arieli A, Slovin H, Vanzetta I, Grinvald A. Long-term optical imaging and spectroscopy reveal mechanisms underlying the intrinsic signal and stability of cortical maps in VI of behaving monkeys. J Neusci 2000; 20: 8111-21
23. Enlund M, Andersson J, Hartvig P, Valtysson J, Wiklund L. Cerebral normoxia in the rhesus monkey during isoflurane- or propofol induced hypotension and hypocapnia, despite disparate blood-flow patterns. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41: 1002-10
24. Cohen ER, Ugurbil K, Kim SG. Effect of basal conditions on the magnitude and dynamics of the blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI response. J Cereb Blood Flow 2002; 22: 1042-53
25. Fiset P, Paus T, Daloze T, et al. Brain mechanism of propofol-induced loss of consciousness in humans. J Neurosci 1999; 19, 5506-13
26. Simpson TP, Manara AR, Kane NM, Barton RL, Rowlands CA, Butler SR. Effect of propofol anaesthesia on the event-related potential mismatch negativity and the auditory-evoked potential N1. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 382-8
27. Pockett S. Anesthesia and the electrophysiology of auditory consciousness. Conscious Cogn 1999; 8: 45-61
28. Tooley MA, Greenslade GL, Prys-Roberts C. Concentration-related effects of propofol on the auditory evoked response. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 720-6
29. Schwarzbauer C. Simultaneous detection of changes in perfusion and BOLD contrast. NMR Biomed 2000; 13: 37-42
30. Thai-Van H, Fraysse B, Berry I, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging may avoid misdiagnosis of cochleovestibular nerve aplasia in congenital deafness. Am J Otol 2000; 21: 663-70