A short-term perceptual priming account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks for unfamiliar stimuli

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 387-402

  Mammarella, Nicola ^a   Avons, S E ^a   Russo, Riccardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 2342484389     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440340000042     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Challis, B. H. (1993). Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 389-396.
2. Challis, B. H., & Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 18, 595-607.
3. Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Greene, R. L. (1989). Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a two-process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 371-377.
5. Greene, R. L., & Stillwell, A. M. (1995). Effects of encoding variability and spacing on frequency discrimination. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 468-476.
6. Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 77-99). Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Kirsner, K., Smith, M. C., Lockhart, R. S., & King, M. L. (1984). The bilingual lexicon: Language-specific units in an integrated network. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 519-539.
8. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. M. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
9. Mammarella, N., Russo, R., & Avons, S. E. (in press). Spacing effects in cued-memory tasks for unfamiliar faces and non-words. Memory and Cognition.
10. McKone, E. (1995). Short-term implicit memory for words and non-words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1108-1126.
11. McKone, E., & Dennis, C. (2000). Short term implicit memory: Visual, auditory and cross modality priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 341-346.
12. Rose, R. J., & Rowe, E. J. (1976). Effects of orienting task and spacing of repetitions on frequency judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2, 142-152.
13. Russo, R., & Mammarella, N. (2002). Spacing effects in recognition memory: When meaning matters. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 49-59.
14. Russo, R., Mammarella, N., & Avons, S. (2002). Toward a unified account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 819-829.
15. Russo, R., Parkin, A. J., Taylor, S. R., & Wilks, J. (1998). Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 161-172.
16. Smith, M. C., Theodor, L., & Franklin, P. E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 697-712.
17. Snodgrass, J. C., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Application to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
18. Toppino, T. C., & Bloom, L. C. (2002). The spacing effect, free recall, and two-process theory: A closer look. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 437-444.