Evaluation of SHAW model in simulating energy balance, leaf temperature and micrometeorological variables within a maize canopy

Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1626-1634

  Xiao, Wei ^a   Zheng, You Fei ^a   Yu, Qiang ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

Author keywords

Energy balance; Leaf temperature; Maize; Micrometeorological; Radiometric temperature; SHAW; Soil temperature

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 23244460377     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Waggoner P E, Reifsnyder W E. Simulation of the temperature, humidity and evaporation profiles in a leaf canopy. J. Appl. Meteor., 1968,7,400-409.
2. Flerchinger G N, Kustas W P, Weltz M A. Simulating surface energy fluxes and radiometric surface temperatures for two arid vegetation communities using the SHAW model. J. Appl. Meteorol., 1998,37(5),449-460.
3. Gao L Z. Foundation of agricultural modeling science. Hongkong: Tianma book finite association, 2004. 15-22.
4. Flerchinger G N, Saxton K E. Simultaneous heat and water model of a freezing snow-residue-soil system I. Theory and development. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 1989,32(2),573-578.
5. Flerchinger G N, Pierson F B. Modeling plant canopy effects on variability of soil temperature and water. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1991, 56:227-246.
6. Flerchinger G N, Cooley K R, Deng Y. Impacts of spatially and temporally varying snowmelt on subsurface flow in a mountainous watershed 1. snowmelt simulation. Hydrol. Sci. J., 1994,39:507-520.
7. Flerchinger G N, Baker J M, Spaans E J A. A test of the radiative energy balance of the SHAW model for snowcover. Hydrol. Proc., 1996,10(10):1359-1367.
8. Flerchinger G N, Hanson C I, Wight J R. Modeling of evapotranspiration and surface energy budgets across a watershed. Water Resour. Res., 1996,32(8):2539-2548.
9. Flerchinger G N, Hanson C L. Modeling soil freezing and thawing on a rangeland water shed. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 1989,32(5):1551-1554.
10. Xu X, Nieber J L, Baker J M, et al. Field testing of a model for water flow and heat transport in variably saturated, variably frozen soil. Transportation Research Record, vol. 1307. Transp. Res. Board, Nat. Res. Council, Washington, DC, 1991. 300-308.
11. Hayhoe H N. Field testing of simulated soil freezing and thawing by the SHAW model. Can. Agric. Eng., 1994,36(4):279-285.
12. Kennedy I, Sharratt B. Model comparisons to simulate frost depth. Soil Sci., 1998,163(8):636-645.
13. Hymer D C, Moran M S, Keefer T O. Soil water evaluation using a hydrologic model and calibrated sensor network. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2000,64(1):319-326.
14. Nassar I N, Horton R, Flerchinger G N. Simultaneous Heat and Mass Transfer in Soil Columns Exposed to Freezing/Thawing Conditions. Soil Science, 2000,165:(3):208-216.
15. Flerchinger G N, Sauer T J, Aiken R A. Effects of crop residue cover and architecture on heat and water transfer at the soil surface. Geoderma, 2003,116:217-133.
16. Sun X M, Yu Q, Luo Y, et al. The design and application of an observation instrument of microclimate within crop canopy. Ecoagriculture Research, 2000,8(1):76-79.
17. Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 1970,10(3):282 -290.
18. Wilson K, Allen Goldstein, et al. Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric. Forest Meteor., 2002,113:223-243
19. Denmead O T and Bradley E F. Flux-gradient relationships in a forest canopy. In: B. A. Hutchison and B. B. Hicks, The Forest-Atmosphere Interaction. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Hingham, Massachdusettes, 1985. 412-442.
20. Wilson T B, Norman J M, Bland W L, et al. Evaluation of the importance of Lagrangian canopy turbulence formulations in a soil-plant-atmosphere model. Agric. Forest Meteor., 2003,115:51-69.