Soil water evaluation using a hydrologic model and calibrated sensor network

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 319-326

  Hymer, D C ^a   Moran, M S ^b   Keefer, T O ^b  

^a NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SENSOR; SOIL WATER;

LARREA TRIDENTATA;

EID: 0034066888     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2000.641319x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Amer, S.A., T.O. Keefer, M.A. Weltz, D.C. Goodrich, and L.B. Bach. 1994. Soil moisture sensors for continuous monitoring. Water Resour. Bull. 30:69-83.
2. Bach, L. 1991. Time domain reflectometry (TDR) for field water content measurements. USDA-Agricultural Research Service Internal Memo. Southwest Watershed Res. Ctr., Tucson.
3. Blyth, E.M., A.J. Dolman, and N. Wood. 1993. Effective resistance to sensible and latent heat flux in heterogeneous terrain. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 19:423-442.
4. Breckenfeld, D.J., W.A. Svetlik, and C.E. McGuire. 1995. Soil survey of Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed. Arizona. USDA-SCS, Tucson.
5. Colman, E.A., and T.M. Hendrix. 1949. The fiberglass electrical soil-moisture instrument. Soil Sci. 67:425-438.
6. Dalton, F.N. 1992. Development of time-domain-reflectometry for measuring soil water content and bulk soil electrical conductivity, p. 153-159. In G.C. Topp et al. (ed.) Advances in measurements of soil physical properties: Bringing theory into practice. SSSA Spec. Publ. 30. SSSA, Madison, WI.
7. Desborough, C.E., A.J. Pitman, and P. Irannejad. 1996. Analysis of the relationship between bare soil evaporation and soil moisture simulated by 13 land surface schemes for a simple non-vegetated site. J. Global Planetary Change 13:47-56.
8. Engman, E.T., and N. Chauhan. 1995. Status of microwave soil moisture measurements with remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 51:189-198.
9. Flerchinger, G.N. 1987. Simultaneous heat and water model of a snow-residue-soil system. Ph.D. diss. Washington State Univ., Pullman.
10. Flerchinger, G.N., W.P. Kustas, and M.A. Weltz. 1998. Simulating surface energy fluxes and radiometric surface temperatures for two arid vegetation communities using the SHAW model. J. Appl. Meteorol. 37:449-460.
11. Halbertsma, J., E.V. den Elsen, H. Bohl, and W. Skierucha. 1994. Temperature effects on TDR determined soil water content, p. 35-37. In L.W. Petersen and O.H. Jacobsen (ed.) Proc. symp.: Time domain reflectometry applications in soil science. Res. Cent. Foulum, Tjele, Denmark. 16 Sept. 1994. Danish Inst. of Plant and Soil Sci., Lyngby, Denmark.
12. Henderson-Sellers, A. 1996. Soil moisture simulation: Achievements of the RICE and PILPS intercomparison workshop and future directions. J. Global Planetary Change 13:99-115.
13. Houser, P.R. 1996. Remote sensing of soil moisture using four dimensional data assimilation. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson.
14. Islam, S., and T. Engman. 1996. Why bother for 0.0001 % of Earth's water? Challenges for soil moisture research, p. 420. Earth Observ. Syst. Newsp. 22 Sept. 1996.
15. Jones, H.G. 1983. Plants and microclimate. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
16. Kustas, W.P., and D.C. Goodrich. 1994. Monsoon '90 preface. Water Resour. Res. 30:1211-1225.
17. Lau, K.M., J.H. Kim, and Y. Sud. 1996. Intercomparison of hydrologic processes in AMIP GCMs. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77:2209-2227.
18. Moran, M.S., D.C. Hymer, J. Qi, R.C. Marsett, M.K. Helfert, and E.E. Sano. 1998. Soil moisture evaluation using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and optical remote sensing in semiarid rangeland. p. 199-203. In Special Symp. on Hydrol., Am. Meteorol. Soc. Meetings, Phoenix, AZ. 11-16 Jan. 1998. Am. Meteorol. Soc., Boston.
19. Renard, K.G., L.J. Lane, J.R. Simanton, W.E. Emmerich, J.J. Stone, M.A. Weltz, D.C. Goodrich, and D.S. Yakowitz. 1993. Agricultural impacts in an arid environment: Walnut Gulch case study. Hydrol. Sci. Technol. 9:145-190.
20. Sano, E.E. 1997. Sensitivity analysis of c- and ku-band synthetic aperture radar data to soil moisture content in a semiarid region. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson.
21. Seyfried, M.S. 1993. Field calibration and monitoring of soil-water content with fiberglass electrical resistance sensors. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:1432-1436.
22. Stannard, D.I., J.H. Blanford, W.P. Kustas, W.D. Nichols, S.A. Amer, T.J. Schmugge, and M.A. Weltz. 1994. Interpretation of surface flux measurements in heterogeneous terrain during Monsoon '90. Water Resour. Res. 29:1185-1194.
23. Tiscareno-Lopez, M. 1991. Sensitivity analysis of the Wepp watershed model. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson.
24. Woolhiser, D.A., R.E. Smith, and D.C. Goodrich. 1990. KINEROS, a kinematic runoff and erosion model: Documentation and users manual. USDA-ARS rep. ARS-77. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.