The intrinsic self and defensiveness: Evidence that activating the intrinsic self reduces self-handicapping and conformity

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 671-683

  Arndt, Jamie ^a   Schimel, Jeff ^b   Greenberg, Jeff ^c   Pyszczynski, Tom ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044534840     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202288011     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. NewYork: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
2. Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-34). NewYork: Academic Press.
3. Baldwin, M. W., Carrel, S. E., & Lopez, D. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435-454.
4. Baldwin, M. W., & Holmes, J. G. (1987). Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1087-1098.
5. Baldwin, M. W., & Sinclair, L. (1996). Self-esteem and "if . . . then" contingencies of interpersonal acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1130-1141.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
7. Baumeister, R. F., & Jones, E. E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target's knowledge: Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 608-618.
8. Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5-33.
9. Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547-579.
10. Becker, E. (1962). The birth and death of meaning. NewYork: Free Press.
11. Beckmann, J., & Kuhl, J. (1984). Altering information to gain action control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 224-237.
12. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
13. Berglas, S., & Jones, E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405-417.
14. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1-51). NewYork: Academic Press.
15. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Volume 1. Attachment. NewYork: Basic Books.
16. Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150-164.
17. Brockner, J. (1988). Self-esteem at work: Research, theory, and practice. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
18. Bushman, B.J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219-229.
19. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). NewYork: Guilford.
20. Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. (2001). Contingencies of worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593-623.
21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-49). NewYork: Plenum.
23. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
24. Epstein, S., & Morling, B. (1995). Is the self motivated to do more than enhance and/or verify itself? In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 9-29). NewYork: Plenum.
25. Feick, D. L., & Rhodewalt, F. (1997). The double-edged sword of self-handicapping: Discounting, augmentation, and the protection and enhancement of self-esteem. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 147-163.
26. Ferrari, J. R. (1991). Self-handicapping by procrastinators: Protecting self-esteem, social-esteem, or both? Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 2-45-261.
27. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
28. Frankel, A., & Snyder, M. (1978). Poor performance following unsolvable anagrams: Learned helplessness or egotism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1415-1423.
29. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NT: Doubleday.
30. Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1985). Compensatory self-inflation: A response to the threat to self-regard of public failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 273-280.
31. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Paisley, C. (1984). The effects of extrinsic incentives on the use of test anxiety as an anticipatory attributional defense: Playing it cool when the stakes are high. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1136-1145.
32. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1982). The self-serving attributional bias: Beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 56-67.
33. Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., & Waschull, S. B. (1995). Not all high (or low) self-esteem people are the same: Theory and research on stability of self-esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 51-71). NewYork: Plenum.
34. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy theory: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
35. Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: Norton.
36. Hull, J. G., Tedlie, J. C., & Lehn, D. A. (1992). Moderator variables in personality research: The problem of controlling for plausible alternatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 115-117.
37. Insko, C. A. (1985). Balance theory, the Jordan paradigm, and the Wiest tetrahedron. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol.18). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
38. Janis, I. L., & Field, P. B. (1956). A behavioral assessment of persuasibility: Consistency of individual differences. Sociometry, 19, 241-259.
39. Katz, I. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
40. Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A. J., & Harlow, T. (1993). There's more to self-esteem then whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204.
41. Kernis, M. H., & Waschull, S. B. (1995). The interactive roles of stability and level of self-esteem: Research and theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 93-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Kohut, H.K. (1971). The analysis of the self. Madison, WI: International University Press.
43. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
44. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
45. May, R. (1953). Man's search for himself. NewYork: Norton.
46. Mead, G. H. (1964). Self. In A. Straus (Ed.), George Herbert Mead on social psychology: Selected papers (pp. 199-246). Chicago: Phoenix Books.
47. Mecca, A. M., Smelser, N. J., & Vasconcellos, J. (1989). The social importance of self-esteem. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Mehlman, R. C., & Snyder, C. R. (1985). Excuse theory: A test of the self-protective role of attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 994-1001.
49. Mikulincer, M., & Arad, D. (1999). Attachment, working models, and cognitive openness in close-relationships: A test of chronic and temporary accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 710-725.
50. Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 143-165). NewYork: Guilford.
51. Newman, L., & Wadas, R. F. (1997). When stakes are higher: Self-esteem instability and self-handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 217-232.
52. Pelham, B. W., & Hetts, J. J. (1999). Implicit and explicit personal and social identity: Toward a more complete understanding of the social self. In T. R. Tyler & R. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 115-143). NewYork: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. (1998). Priming relational schemas: Effects of contextually activated and chronically accessible interpersonal expectations on responses to a stressful event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1441-1448.
54. Prapavessis, H., & Grove, R. J. (1998). Self-handicapping and self-esteem. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 10, 175-184.
55. Rhodewalt, R., Morf, C., Hazlett, S., & Fairfield, M. (1991). Self-handicapping: The role of discounting and augmentation in the preservation of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 122-131.
56. Roese, N.J., & Olson, J. M. (1993). Self-esteem and counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 65, 199-206.
57. Rogers, C. R. (1959). Therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184-256). Toronto, Canada: McGraw-Hill.
58. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
59. Santee, R. T., & Maslach, C. (1982). To agree or not to agree: Personal dissent amid social pressure to conform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 690-700.
60. Schimel, J., Arndt, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2001). Being accepted for who were are: Evidence that social validation of the intrinsic self reduces general defensiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
61. Schimel, J. A., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., O'Mahen, H., & Arndt, J. (2000). Running from the shadow: Psychological distancing from others to deny characteristics people fear in themselves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 446-462.
62. Seligman, M.E.P., Reivich, K., Jaycox, L., & Gillham, J. (1995). The optimistic child. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
63. Sheldon, K. M. (2001). The self-concordance model of healthy goal striving: When personal goals correctly represent the person. In P. Schmuck & K. Sheldon (Eds.), Life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving (pp. 18-36). Kirkland, WA,: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
64. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1319-1331.
65. Snyder, C. R. (1990). Self-handicapping processes and sequale: On the taking of a psychological dive. In R. L. Higgins, C. R. Snyder, & S. C. Berglas (Eds.), Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn't (pp. 107-145) NewYork: Plenum.
66. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 93-159). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
67. Steele, C. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-34). NewYork: Academic Press.
68. Stephan, W. G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1981). Affect as a mediator of attributional egotism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 443-458.
69. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. NewYork: Norton.
70. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
71. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
72. Tesser, A. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 290-299.
73. Tice, D. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 711-725.
74. Tice, D., & Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Self-esteem, self-handicapping, and self-presentation: The strategy of inadequate practice. Journal of Personality, 58, 443-464.
75. Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R.M., & Leitten, C.L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248-260.
76. Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kibler, J., & Ernst, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 63-72.
77. Tunnel, G. (1984). The discrepancy between private and public selves: Public self-consciousness and its correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 549-555.
78. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.
79. Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leck, K., & Purvis, D. (1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181-1193.