The asam patient placement criteria: Context, concepts and continuing development

Journal of Addictive Diseases

Volumn 22, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-8

  Gastfriend, David R ^a   Mee Lee, David ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b National Clinical Criteria Training and Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; ALGORITHM; EDITORIAL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE;

ALCOHOLISM; ALGORITHMS; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 23044496419     PISSN: 10550887     EISSN: 15450848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J069v22S01_01     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. Washington: National Academy Press, 1990.
2. Leshner AI. Science-based views of drug addiction and its treatment. JAMA. 1999;282:1314-1381.
3. Principles of drug addiction treatment-a research-based guide. Principles of ef-fective treatment. National Institutes of Health Publication, no. 99-4180, 1999.
4. Hoffmann NG, Halikas JA, Mee-Lee D. The Cleveland admission, discharge, and transfer criteria: model for chemical dependency treatment programs. Cleveland: Northern Ohio Chemical Dependency Treatment Directors Association, 1987.
5. Weedman RD. Admission, continued stay and discharge criteria for adult alco-holism and drug dependence treatment services. Irvine: National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers, 1987.
6. Gastfriend D. Patient placement criteria. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD, eds. Text-book of substance abuse treatment. Washington: The American Psychiatric Press, 1999:121-127.
7. Hoffmann N, Halikas J, Mee-Lee D, Weedman R. American society of addiction medicine-patient placement criteria for the treatment of psychoactive substance use disorders. Washington, DC: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc., 1991.
8. American Society of Addiction Medicine. Patient placement criteria for the treatment of substance-related disorders. Chevy Chase: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc., 1996.
9. Mee-Lee D, Shulman GD, Fishman M et al., eds. ASAM patient placement criteria for the treatment of substance-related disorders, second edition-revised (ASAM PPC-2R). Chevy Chase: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc., 2001.
10. American Psychiatric Association: DSM-IV diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition. Washington: American Psychiatric Press, 1994.
11. American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for treatment of patients with substance use disorders: alcohol, cocaine, opioids. Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 1995.
12. Book J, Harbim H, Marques C, et al. The ASAM’s and Green Spring’s alcohol and drug detoxification and rehabilitation criteria for utilization review. Am J Addiction. 1995;4:187-197.
13. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. The role and current status of patient placement criteria in the treatment of substance use disorders. Treatment improvement protocol (TIP). Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1995.
14. Hser YI, Polinsky ML, Maglione M, Anglin MD. Matching clients’ needs with drug treatment services. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999;16:299-305.
15. McLellan AT, Grissom GR, Zanis D et al. Problem-service ‘matching’ in addiction treatment: a prospective study in 4 programs. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54: 730-735.
16. Gastfriend DR, Lu SH, Sharon E. Placement matching: challenges and technical progress. Subst Use Misuse. 2000;35:2191-213.
17. Annis H. Patient-treatment matching in the management of alcoholism. NIDA Res Monogr. 1988;90:152-161.
18. Hayashida M, Alterman AI, McLellan AT et al. Comparative effectiveness and costs of inpatient and outpatient detoxification of patients with mild-to-moderate alcohol withdrawal syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:358-365.
19. Alterman AI, O'Brien CP, McLellan AT et al. Effectiveness and costs of inpatient versus day hospital cocaine rehabilitation. J Nerv Mental Dis. 1994;182:157-163.
20. Mechanic D, Schlesinger M, McAlpine DD. Management of mental health and substance abuse services: state of the art an early results. Milbank Q. 1995;73:19-55.
21. Gastfriend DR, McLellan AT. Treatment matching: theoretic basis and practical implications. Med Clin N Amer. 1997;81:945-966.
22. Levine HJ, Turner W, Reif S et al. Determining service variations between and within ASAM Levels of Care. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(Suppl. 1):9-25.
23. Plough A, Shirley L, Zaremba N et al. CSAT target cities demonstration final evaluation report. Boston: Office for Treatment Improvement, 1996.
24. Morey L. Patient placement criteria: linking typologies to managed care. Alcohol Health and Research World. 1996;20:36-44.
25. McKay JR, Cacciola JS, McLellan AT et al. An initial evaluation of the psychosocial dimensions of the american society of addiction medicine criteria for inpatient vs. intensive outpatient substance abuse rehabilitation. J Stud Alcohol. 1997; 58:239-252.
26. Deck D, Gabriel R, Knudsen J, Grams G. Impact of patient placement criteria on substance abuse treatment under the Oregon Health Plan. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(Suppl. 1):27-44.
27. May WW. A field application of the ASAM placement criteria in a 12-step model of treatment for chemical dependency. J Addict. Dis. 1998;17:77-91.
28. Turner WM, Turner KH, Reif S et al. Feasibility of multidimensional substance abuse treatment matching: Automating the ASAM patient placement criteria. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;55:35-43.
29. Baker SL, Gastfriend DR. Reliability of multidimensional substance abuse treatment matching: implementing the ASAM patient placement criteria. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(Suppl. 1):45-60.
30. Sharon E, Krebs C, Turner W et al. Predictive validity of the ASAM patient placement criteria for hospital utilization. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(Suppl. 1): 79-93.
31. Staines G, Kosanke N, Magura S et al. Convergent validity of the ASAM patient placement criteria using a standardized computer algorithm. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(Suppl. 1):61-77.
32. Magura S, Staines G, Kosanke N et al. Predictive validity of the ASAM patient placement criteria: outcomes for patients naturalistically matched and mismatched to levels of care. J Subst Abuse Treatment. Am J Addict. 2003; 12:386-397.
33. Gastfriend DR. ASAM annual medical-scientific meeting. Los Angeles: April 2001.
34. Gastfriend DR, Rubin A, Sharon E et al. New constructs and assessments for re-lapse and continued use potential in the ASAM patent placement criteria. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(Suppl. 1):95-111.
35. Minkoff K, Zweben J, Rosenthal R, Ries R. Development of service intensity criteria and program categories for individuals with co-occurring disorders. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(Suppl. 1):113-129.