A field application of the asam placement criteria in a 12-step model of treatment for chemical dependency

Journal of Addictive Diseases

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 77-91

  May, William W ^a  

^a EastRidge Health Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RATING SCALE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; PATIENT ADMISSION; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0031969564     PISSN: 10550887     EISSN: 15450848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J069v17n02_06     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Hoffman NG, Halikas JA, Mee-Lee D, Weedman RD. Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Psychoactive Substance Use Disorders. Washington DC; American Society of Addiction Medicine, 1991.
2. Hester RK. Outcome research: Alcoholism. In Galanter M, Kleber HD, (editors), Textbook of Substance Abuse Treatment. Washington, DC; The American Psychiatric Press, Inc; 1994, pp. 35–44.
3. Shoptaw S, Rawson RA, McCann MJ, Obert JL. The matrix model of out-patient stimulant abuse treatment: Evidence of efficacy. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 13:129–141, 1994.
4. Model Criteria for Adult Client Placement. Charleston, West Virginia. WV Division on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.
5. Recovery Attitude and Treatment Evaluator. St. Paul, Minnesota. CATOR/New Standards, 1992.
6. May WW. A behaviorally anchored rating method for using the ASAM pa-tient placement criteria. Unpublished report. DVA Medical Center, Martinsburg WV, 1993.
7. Dwyer CA. Cut scores and testing: Statistics, Judgment, Truth, and Error. Psychological Assessment, 8:360–362, 1996.
8. May WW. Instruction Manual for Using the Dimension Rating System. Charles Town, WV, 1995.
9. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the mutlitrait-multimethod matrix. In Mehrens WA, Ebel RL (editors) Principles of Educational and Psychological Measurement. Chicago Illinois; Rand McNally & Co., 1969.
10. Alcoholism study fails to link client matching with outcomes. New York, NY; Substance Abuse Letter, 3:1–3, 1997.
11. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity; Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol; January: 7–29, 1997.
12. Mee-Lee D, Gartner L, Miller MM, Shulman GD. ASAM PPC-2; Chevy Chase, Maryland, 1996.