Predictive validity of the asam patient placement criteria for hospital utilization

Journal of Addictive Diseases

Volumn 22, Issue , 2004, Pages 79-93

  Sharon, Estee ^a,b   Turner, Winston ^a   Gastfriend, David R ^a   Krebs, Chris ^b   Desai, Nitigna ^b   Binus, Gregory ^b   Penk, Walter ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Asam level of care; Predictive validity; Readmission; Substance abuse treatment outcome; Utilization

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 73649128339     PISSN: 10550887     EISSN: 15450848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J069v22S01_06     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. McLellan A, Woody G, Metzger D, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of treat-ments for substance use disorders: Appropriate comparisons. Milbank Quart. 1996; 74(1):51-85.
2. Gastfriend DR, McLellan AT. Treatment matching: Theoretic basis and practical implications. Med Clin N Amer. 1997;81(4):945-966.
3. Morey L. Patient placement criteria Linking typologies to managed care. Alc Health & Rsh Wld. 1996;20(1):36-44.
4. Gastfriend D. Patient Placement Criteria. In: GalanterM, Kleber HD, eds. Text-book of Substance Abuse Treatment. Second Ed. Washington: The American Psychiatric Press, 1999:121-127.
5. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems: A Report of a Study by a Committee of the Institute of Medicine, Division of Mental Health and Behavioral Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
6. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. The Role and Current Status of Patient Placement Criteria in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1995.
7. McLellan AT, Grissom GR, Zanis D, et al. Problem-service ‘Matching’ in ad-diction treatment: A prospective study in 4 programs. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997; 54(8):730-735.
8. Hoffmann N, Halikas J, Mee-Lee D, Weedman R. American Society of Addiction Medicine-Patient Placement Criteria for the treatment of psychoactive substance use disorders. 1st ed. Washington, DC: ASAM, 1991.
9. Book J, Harbim H, Marques C, et al. The ASAM’s and Green Spring’s alcohol and drug detoxification and rehabilitation criteria for utilization review. Am J Addiction. 1995; 4(3):187-197.
10. Hoffmann N, Halikas J, Mee-Lee D. The Cleveland Admission, Discharge and Transfer Criteria: Model for Chemical Dependency Treatment Programs. Cleveland, OH: Northern Ohio Chemical Dependency Treatment Consortium, 1987.
11. McKay JR, Cacciola JS, McLellan AT, et al. An initial evaluation of the psychosocial dimensions of the American Society of Addiction Medicine criteria for inpatient vs. intensive outpatient substance abuse rehabilitation. J Stud Alcohol. 1997;58(5):239-252.
12. Plough A, Shirley L, Zaremba N, et al. CSAT target cities demonstration final evaluation report: Boston Office for Treatment Improvement, 1996.
13. Shwartz M, Gastfriend DR, Mulvey K, et al. The Boston Target Cities Program: Overview and evaluation results. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1999;31(3):265-272.
14. Gastfriend DR, Lu S, Sharon E. Substance use & misuse. Marcel Dekker, Inc. 2000:2191-2213.
15. Chen S, Wagner TH, Barnett PG. The effect of reforms on spending for veterans’ substance abuse treatment. Health Affairs. 2001;20(4):169-175.
16. Booth BM, Blow FC, Cook CA, et al. Relationship between inpatient alcoholism treatment and longitudinal changes in health care utilization. J Stud Alcohol. 1997; 58(6):625-637.
17. Turner WM, Turner KH, Reif S, et al. Feasibility of multidimensional substance abuse treatment matching: Automating the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria. Drug Alc Depend. 1999; 55:35-43.
18. American Society of Addiction Medicine. ASAM PPC-2R/ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders. Second Edition- Revised ed. Maryland: American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM), 2001.
19. Mee-Lee D, Shulman GD, Fishman M et al., eds. ASAM Patient Placement Cri-teria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders, Second Edition-Revised (ASAM PPC-2R). Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc., 2001.
20. Baker SL, Gastfriend DR. Reliability of multidimensional substance abuse treatment matching: Implementing the ASAM patient placement criteria. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(S):45-60.
21. Alterman AI, McLellan AT, Shifman RB. Do substance abuse patients with more psychopathology receive more treatment? JNerv Ment Dis. 1993; 181:576-582.
22. McLellan A, Kushner H, Metzger M, et al. The fifth edition of the Addiction Se-verity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992; 9:199-213.
23. Sullivan JT, Sykora K, Schneiderman J, et al. Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: The revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale. Br J Addict. 1989; 84:1353-1357.
24. Fudala PJ, Berkow LC, Fralich JL, Johnson RE. Use of naloxone in the assess-ment of opiate dependence. Life Sci. 1991; 49(24):1809-1814.
25. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
26. Magura S, Staines G, Kosanke N, et al. Predictive validity of the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria: Outcomes for patients naturalistically matched and mismatched to Levels of Care. Am J Addict. 2003; 12:386-397.
27. Humphreys K, Weingardt KR. Assessing readmission to substance abuse treatment as an indicator of outcome and program performance. Psychiatr Serv. 2000; 51:1568-1569.