Developing univariate distributions from data for risk analysis

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (HERA)

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 755-783

  Thompson, Kimberly M ^a  

^a HARVARD CENTER FOR RISK ANALYSIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributions; Goodness of fit; Monte Carlo simulation; Parametric distributions; Risk assessment; Uncertainty; Variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 22844455396     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.1999.9657739     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Applebaum, D. 1996. Probability and Information: An Integrated Approach. New York, Cambridge University Press.
2. Baird, S.J.S., Thompson, K.M., and Swartout, J.C. 1999. Data base uncertainty factor distribution development, In preparation for submission to Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.
3. Barnett, V. 1975. Probability plotting methods and order statistics, J. R. Statist. Soc. C24, 95-108.
4. Berger, J.O. and Berry, D.A. 1988. Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity, Am. Sci. 76, 159-165.
5. Berry, D.A. and Stangl, D.K. 1996. Bayesian methods in health-related research. In: Bayesian Biostatistics, Chapter 1, pp. 3-66. (Berry, D.A. and Stangl, D.K., Eds.). New York, Marcel Dekker.
6. Blom, G. 1958. Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta Variables. New York, John Wiley and Sons.
7. Bratley, P., Fox, B.L., and Schrage, L.E. 1987. A Guide to Simulation. New York, Springer-Verlag.
8. Burmaster, D.E. and Thompson, K.M. 1997. Estimating exposure point concentrations for surface soils for use in deterministic and probabilistic risk assessments, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 3(3), 363-384.
9. Burmaster, D.E. and Thompson, K.M. 1998. Fitting second-order parametric distributions to data using maximum likelihood estimation, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 4(2), 319-339.
10. Cooke, R.M. 1991. Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. New York, Oxford University Press.
11. Cullen, A.C. and Frey, H.C. 1998. Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment: A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs. New York, Plenum Press.
12. D'Agostino, R.B. and Stephens, M.A. 1986. Goodness-of-Fit Techniques. New York, Marcel Dekker.
13. Driver, J.H., Ginevan, M.E., and Whitmyre, G.K. 1996. Estimation of dietary exposure to chemicals: A case study illustrating methods of distributional analyses for food consumption data, Risk Anal. 16(6), 763-771.
14. Efron, B. and Morris, C. 1977. Stein's paradox in statistics, Sci. Amer. 236, 119-127.
15. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, Chapman and Hall.
16. Evans, J.S., Gray, G.M., Sielken, R.L., Smith, A.E., Valdez-Flores, C., and Graham, J.D. 1994. Use of probabilistic expert judgment in uncertainty analysis of carcinogenic potency, Reg. Tox. Pharm. 20, 15-36.
17. Evans, M., Hastings, N., and Peacock, B. 1993. Statistical Distributions, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
18. Filliben, J.J. 1975. The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality, Technometrics 17, 111-117.
19. Finkel, A.M. 1994. Stepping out of your own shadow: A didactic example of how facing uncertainty can improve decision making, Risk Anal. 14(5), 751-761.
20. Frey, H.C. and Burmaster, D.E. 1999. Methods for characterizing variability and uncertainty: Comparison of bootstrap simulation and likelihood-based approaches, Risk Anal. 19(1), 109-130.
21. Gan, F.F. and Koehler, K.J. 1990. Goodness-of-fit tests based on p-p probability plots, Technometrics 32(3), 289-303.
22. Gan, F.F., K.J. Koehler, and Thompson, J.C. 1991. Probability plots and distribution curves for assessing the fit of probability models, Am. Stat. 45(1), 14-21.
23. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., and Rubin, D.B. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. New York, Chapman & Hall.
24. Gumbel, E.J. 1958. Statistics of Extremes. New York, Columbia University Press.
25. Haas, C.N. 1997. Importance of distributional form in characterizing inputs to Monte Carlo assessments, Risk Anal. 17(1), 107-113.
26. Hahn, G.J. and S.S. Shapiro 1967. Statistical Models in Engineering. New York, John Wiley and Sons.
27. Hamed, M.M. and Bedient, P.B. 1997. On the effect of probability distributions of input variables in public health risk assessment, Risk Anal. 17(1), 97-105.
28. Hammitt, J.K and Shlyakhter, A.I. 1999. The expected value of information and the probability of surprise, Risk Anal. 19(1), 135-152.
29. Harter, L.H. 1984. Another look at plotting positions, Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 13(13), 1613-1633.
30. Hasselblad, V., Stead, A.G., and Galke, W. 1980. Analysis of coarsely grouped data from the lognormal distribution, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 75, 771-778.
31. Hattis, D. and Burmaster, D.E. 1994. Assessment of variability and uncertainty distributions for practical risk assessments, Risk Anal. 14(5), 713-730.
32. Hazen, A. 1914. Storage to be provided in impounding reservoirs for municipal water supply, Trans. Am. Soc. Civil. Eng. 77, 1539-1640.
33. Heitjan, D.F. 1989. Inference from grouped continuous data: A review, Statist. Sci. 4(2), 164-183.
34. Helsel, D.R. 1990. Less than obvious: Statistical treatment of data below the detection limit, Environ. Sci. Tech. 24(12), 1766-1774.
35. Hirsch, R.P. and Riegelman, R.K 1992. Statistical First Aid: Interpretation of Health Research Data. Cambridge, MA, Blackwell Science.
36. Kimball, B.Z. 1960. On the choice of plotting positions on probability paper, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 55, 546-560.
37. Law, A.M. and Kelton, W.D. 1991. Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill.
38. Lilliefors, H. 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64, 399-402.
39. Lipton, J., Shaw, W.D., Holmes, J., and Patterson, A. 1995. Short communication: Selecting input distributions for use in Monte Carlo simulations, Reg. Tox. Pharm. 21, 192-198.
40. Mann, H.B. and Wald, A. 1942. On the choice of the number of class intervals in the application of the chi-square test, Ann. Math. Statist. 13, 306-317.
41. McKone, T.E. and Bogen, K.T. 1992. Uncertainties in health-risk assessment: An integrated case study based on tetrachloroethylene in California groundwater, Reg. Tox. Pharm. 15, 86-103.
42. Morgan, M.G. and Henrion, M. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis.
43. Primarily Chapter 5. Probability distributions and statistical estimation, by Small, M.J., pp 73-101,
44. Chapter 6. Human judgment about and with uncertainty. pp. 102-140,
45. Chapter 7. Performing probability assessment. pp. 141-171,
46. Chapter 8. The propagation and analysis of uncertainty. pp. 172-219. New York, Cambridge University Press.
47. NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Science and judgment in risk assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48. Ott, W.R. 1990. A physical explanation of the lognormality of pollutant concentrations, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 40, 1378-1383.
49. Ott, W.R. 1995. Environmental Statistics and Data Analysis. Boca Raton, Lewis Publishers.
50. Price, P.S., Su, S.H., and Gray, M.N. 1994. The effect of sampling bias on estimates of angler consumption rates in creel surveys, J. Exp. Anal. Environ. Epi. 4(3), 355-372.
51. Schnute, J. 1987. Data uncertainty, model ambiguity, and model identification, Natural Res. Model. 2(2), 159-212.
52. Schorr, B. 1974. On the choice of the class intervals in the application of the chi-square test, Math. Operations Forsch. u Statist. 5, 357-377.
53. Seiler, F.A. and Alvarez, J.L. 1996. On the selection of distributions for stochastic variables, Risk Anal. 16(1), 5-18.
54. Seiler, F.A. and Alvarez, J.L. 1995. Toward a new risk assessment paradigm: Variability, uncertainty, and errors, Technol. J. Franklin Inst. 332A, 221-235.
55. Shlyakhter, A.I. 1994. Improved framework for uncertainty analysis: Accounting for unsuspected errors, Risk Anal. 14, 441-447.
56. Smith, A.E., Ryan, P.B., and Evans, J.S. 1992. The effect of neglecting correlations when propagating uncertainty and estimating the population distribution of risk, Risk Anal. 12, 467-474.
57. Swan, A.V. 1969. Computing maximum likelihood estimates for parameters of the normal distribution from grouped and censored data, Appl. Statist. 18, 65-69.
58. Taylor, A.C. 1993. Using objective and subjective information to generate distributions for probabilistic exposure assessment, J. Exp. Anal. Environ. Epi. 3, 285-298.
59. Thompson, K.M. and Graham, J.D. 1996. Going beyond the single number: Using probabilistic risk assessment to improve risk management, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2(4), 1008-1032.
60. Thompson, K.M. 1999. Software Review of Distribution Fitting Programs: Crystal Ball and BestFit Add-In to @RISK, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 5(3), 501-508.
61. Tukey, J.W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
62. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis, EPA/630/R-97/001, March. Washington, DC, US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum.
63. Vose, D 1996. Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modelling. New York, John Wiley and Sons.
64. Wallace, L., Duan, N., and Zeigenfus, R. 1994. Can long-term exposure distributions be predicted from short-term measurements? Risk Anal. 14(1), 75-85.
65. Walker, K.D., Evans, J.S., and Macintosh, D.L. 1999. Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment part 1: Characterization of personal exposure to benzene, Submitted to J. Exp. Anal. Environ. Epi.
66. Wilson, R. and Clark, W. 1991. Risk assessment and risk management: Their separation should not mean divorce, In: Risk Anal., (Zervos, C., Ed.). New York, Plenum Press.