Stapled hemorrhoidopexy [1] (multiple letters)

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1489-1490

  Ortiz, Héctor ^a   Khubchandani, Indru T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANUS SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; EUROPE; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; AMBULATORY SURGERY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEMOSTASIS; INSTRUMENTATION; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; SURGERY;

AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEMORRHOIDS; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 22844450551     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0020-1     Document Type: Letter

References (12)

1. 1. S Esser I Khubchandani M Rakhmanine 2004 Stapled hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia can be performed safely and cost-efficiently Dis Colon Rectum 47 1164 9 15148647
2. 2. MJ Cheetham NJ Mortensen PO Nystrom MA Kamm RK Phillips 2000 Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 356 730 3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjvVKquw%3D%3D 11085693
3. 3. RG Molloy D Kingsmore 2000 Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 810 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSqug%3D%3D 10711934
4. 4. VW Fazio 2000 Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 768 9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSrsQ%3D%3D 10711919
5. 5. P Boccasanta PG Capretti M Venturi 2001 Randomized controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse Am J Surg 182 64 8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvovFOnuw%3D%3D 11532418
6. 6. E Ganio DF Altomare F Gabrielli G Milito S Canuti 2001 Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 669 74 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mslentw%3D%3D 11350437
7. 7. R Shalaby A Desoky 2001 Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 1049 53 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvktlWhsQ%3D%3D 11488788
8. 8. JM Correa-Rovelo O Tellez L Obregón A Miranda-Gomez S Moran 2002 Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial Dis Colon Rectum 45 1367 74
9. 9. I Goulimaris I Kanellos E Christoforidis I Mantzoros Ch Odisseos D Betsis 2002 Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan-Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study Eur J Surg 168 621 5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7otVWksw%3D%3D 12699099
10. 10. H Ortiz J Marzo P Armendariz 2002 Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 89 1376 81 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38njt1agtA%3D%3D 12390376
11. 11. D Palimento M Picchio U Attanasio A Lombardi C Bambini A Renda 2003 Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results World J Surg 27 203 7 12616437
12. 12. ML Corman JF Gravié T Hager 2003 Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party—indications, contra-indications and technique Colorectal Dis 5 304 10 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szkslajtw%3D%3D 12814406