Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan-Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: A prospective study

European Journal of Surgery

Volumn 168, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 621-625

  Goulimaris, I ^a,b   Kanellos, I ^a   Christoforidis, E ^a   Mantzoros, I ^a   Odisseos, Ch ^a   Betsis, D ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy; Short term results; Stapled haemorrhoidectomy

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; LONARID N; PARACETAMOL;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MILLIGAN MORGAN EXCISION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENCE RISK; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL PROLAPSE; RECURRENCE; SURGICAL STAPLING;

EID: 0036947266     PISSN: 11024151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11024150201680009     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Arvanitidou M, Kanellou K, Constantinides TC, Katsougianopoulos V. The occurrence of fungi in hospital and community potable waters. Lett Appl Microbiol 1999; 29: 81-84.
2. Beattie GC, Lam JPH, Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Diseases 2000; 2: 137-142.
3. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom PO, et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356: 730-733.
4. Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 768-769.
5. Ganio E, Altomare F, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 669-674.
6. Goligher J. Surgery of the anus, rectum, and colon. 5th ed. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1984: 158-159.
7. Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy - cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1666-1675.
8. Mehigan BJ, Monson JRT, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782-785.
9. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 810.
10. Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S. Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1997; 1: 96-98.
11. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 779-781.
12. Seow-Choen F. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gain? Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1-3.
13. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1049-1053.
14. Thompson WHF. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 542-552.