Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: A consensus position paper by an international working party - Indications, contra-indications and technique

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 304-310

  Corman, M L ^a   Gravie J F ^e   Hager, T ^f   Loudon, M A ^g   Mascagni, D ^h   Nystrom P O ^f   Seow Choen, F ⁱ   Abcarian, H ^b   Marcello, P ^c   Weiss, E ^d   Longo, A ^j  

^a LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^c LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

^e Clinique du Chateau   (France)

^f Frankenwaldklinik ^*

^g ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^h Istituto di Clinica ORL   (Italy)

ⁱ SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^j Intensive Care Unit   (Austria)

more..

Author keywords

Haemorrhoidectomy; Haemorrhoids; Mucosectomy; Stapling

Indexed keywords

SUTURE MATERIAL;

ANUS SURGERY; ARTICLE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; HEMORRHOIDOPEXY; HOSPITALIZATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM SURGERY; SURGEON; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0038301830     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00483.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Longo A. (1998) Treatment of Hemorrhoid Disease by Reduction of Mucosa and Hemorrhoid Prolapse with a Circular-Suturing Device: a New Procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, pp. 777-84. Rome, Italy, June 3-6, 1998.
2. Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 768-9.
3. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 779-81.
4. Seow-Choen F. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gain. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1-3.
5. Pescatori M. Stapled rectal prolapsectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 876-7 (letter).
6. Ho Y-H, Cheong W-K, Tsang C et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy - cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1666-75.
7. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782-5.
8. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nyström P-O et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356: 730-3.
9. Capomagi A, Mannetta V, Balestrieri A et al. Circular hemorrhoidectomy using a stapler. the 'gold standard' for the treatment of hemorrhoids? Preliminary data regarding 206 consecutive patients. It J Coloproct 1999; 2: 39-43.
10. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 810 (letter).
11. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Chiumarulo C, Palasciano N. Treatment of external anal mucosal prolapse with circular stapler: an easy and effective new surgical technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1102-5.
12. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 669-74.
13. Beattie GC, Lam JPH, Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2000; 2: 137-42.
14. Beattie GC, Loudon MA. Follow-up confirms sustained benefit of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of prolapsing haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 850-2.
15. Pernice LM, Bartalucci B, Bencini L et al. Early and late (ten years) experience with circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 836-41.
16. Gravié J-F. Traitement des hèmorrhoïdes de Stade III et IV par la technique de Longo. Ann Chir 1999; 53: 245-7.
17. Marti MC. Mechanical hemorrhoidectomy using circular staples: warning to colleagues. Swiss Surg 1999; 5: 151-4.
18. Kohlstadt CM, Weber J, Prohm P. Die Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie eine neue Alternative zu den konventionellen Method. Zentralb Chir 1999; 124: 238-43.
19. Khalil KH, O'Bichere A, Sellu D. Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1352-5.
20. Gabrielli F, Chiarelli M, Cioffi U et al. Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolapse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesia. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 842-4.
21. Arnaud J-P, Pessaux P, Huten N et al. Treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler, a new alternative to conventional methods: a prospective study of 140 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193: 161-5.
22. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1049-53.
23. Singer MA, Cintron JR, Fleshman JW et al. Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 360-9.
24. Correa-Rovelo J, Tellez O, Obregon L et al. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1374-5.
25. Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA. Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 337-40.
26. Longo A. Stapled anopexy and stapled hemorrhoidectomy: two opposite concepts and procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 571-2.
27. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1376-81.
28. Pescatori M. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 122-3.
29. Wilson M, Pope V, Doran D et al. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1437-44.
30. Guy R, Ng CE, Eu K-W. Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs. in-patient procedures. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 29-32.
31. The Standards Task Force. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 1118-20.
32. Cipriani S, Pescatori M. Acute rectal obstruction after PPH stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4: 367-70.
33. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, pneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids. Report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 268-70.
34. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 768-9.
35. Maw A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 826-8.
36. Pescatori M. Management of post-anopexy rectal stricture. Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6: 125-6.
37. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al. Complications after stapled Hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6: 83-8.
38. Gy R, Seow-Choen F. Septic complications after treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 147-56.